Suppr超能文献

“放任的恶果”:性教育与放任的社会

'The ravages of permissiveness': sex education and the permissive society.

作者信息

Hampshire James, Lewis Jane

机构信息

University of Oxford.

出版信息

20 Century Br Hist. 2004;15(3):290-312. doi: 10.1093/tcbh/15.3.290.

Abstract

In this article we explore how sex education in schools has become an adversarial political issue. Although sex education has never been a wholly uncontroversial subject, we show that for two decades after the Second World War there was a broad consensus among policy-makers that it offered a solution to public health and social problems, especially venereal disease. From the late 1960s, this consensus came under attack. As part of a wider effort to reverse the changes associated with the 'permissive' society and legislation of the late 1960s, moral traditionalists and pro-family campaigners sought to problematize sex education. They depicted it as morally corrupting and redefined it as a problem rather than a public health solution. Henceforth, the politics of sex education became increasingly polarized and adversarial. We conclude that the fractious debates about sex education in the 1980s and 1990s are a legacy of this reaction against the permissive society.

摘要

在本文中,我们探讨了学校性教育如何成为一个充满对抗性的政治问题。尽管性教育从来都不是一个完全没有争议的话题,但我们表明,在第二次世界大战后的二十年里,政策制定者们达成了广泛共识,即性教育为解决公共卫生和社会问题,尤其是性病问题提供了一种解决方案。从20世纪60年代末开始,这一共识受到了攻击。作为扭转与20世纪60年代末“放纵”社会及立法相关变化的更广泛努力的一部分,道德传统主义者和亲家庭活动家试图将性教育问题化。他们将其描述为道德败坏,并将其重新定义为一个问题,而非一种公共卫生解决方案。此后,性教育的政治变得越来越两极分化和充满对抗性。我们得出结论,20世纪80年代和90年代关于性教育的激烈辩论是这种对放纵社会的反应的遗留产物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验