Suppr超能文献

大容量储奶罐牛奶体细胞和细菌计数监测指南。

Guidelines for monitoring bulk tank milk somatic cell and bacterial counts.

作者信息

Jayarao B M, Pillai S R, Sawant A A, Wolfgang D R, Hegde N V

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802, USA.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2004 Oct;87(10):3561-73. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73493-1.

Abstract

This study was conducted to establish guidelines for monitoring bulk tank milk somatic cell count and bacterial counts, and to understand the relationship between different bacterial groups that occur in bulk tank milk. One hundred twenty-six dairy farms in 14 counties of Pennsylvania participated, each providing one bulk tank milk sample every 15 d for 2 mo. The 4 bulk tank milk samples from each farm were examined for bulk tank somatic cell count and bacterial counts including standard plate count, preliminary incubation count, laboratory pasteurization count, coagulase-negative staphylococcal count, environmental streptococcal count, coliform count, and gram-negative noncoliform count. The milk samples were also examined for presence of Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae, and Mycoplasma. The bacterial counts of 4 bulk tank milk samples examined over an 8-wk period were averaged and expressed as mean bacterial count per milliliter. The study revealed that an increase in the frequency of isolation of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae was significantly associated with an increased bulk tank somatic cell count. Paired correlation analysis showed that there was low correlation between different bacterial counts. Bulk tank milk with low (<5000 cfu/mL) standard plate count also had a significantly low level of mean bulk tank somatic cell count (<200,000 cells/mL), preliminary incubation count (<10,000 cfu/mL), laboratory pasteurization count (<100 cfu/mL), coagulase-negative staphylococci and environmental streptococcal counts (<500 cfu/mL), and noncoliform count (<200 cfu/mL). Coliform count was less likely to be associated with somatic cell or other bacterial counts. Herd size and farm management practices had considerable influence on somatic cell and bacterial counts in bulk tank milk. Dairy herds that used automatic milking detachers, sand as bedding material, dip cups for teat dipping instead of spraying, and practiced pre-and postdipping had significantly lower bulk tank somatic cell and/or bacterial counts. In conclusion, categorized bulk tank somatic cell and bacterial counts could serve as indicators and facilitate monitoring of herd udder health and milk quality.

摘要

本研究旨在制定监测贮奶罐牛奶体细胞计数和细菌计数的指导方针,并了解贮奶罐牛奶中不同细菌群体之间的关系。宾夕法尼亚州14个县的126个奶牛场参与了研究,每个奶牛场每15天提供一份贮奶罐牛奶样本,持续2个月。对每个奶牛场的4份贮奶罐牛奶样本进行贮奶罐体细胞计数和细菌计数检测,包括标准平板计数、初步培养计数、实验室巴氏杀菌计数、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌计数、环境链球菌计数、大肠菌群计数和革兰氏阴性非大肠菌群计数。还检测了牛奶样本中是否存在金黄色葡萄球菌、无乳链球菌和支原体。对8周内检测的4份贮奶罐牛奶样本的细菌计数进行平均,并表示为每毫升的平均细菌计数。研究表明,金黄色葡萄球菌和无乳链球菌分离频率的增加与贮奶罐体细胞计数的增加显著相关。配对相关性分析表明,不同细菌计数之间的相关性较低。标准平板计数低(<5000 cfu/mL)的贮奶罐牛奶,其平均贮奶罐体细胞计数(<200,000个细胞/mL)、初步培养计数(<10,000 cfu/mL)、实验室巴氏杀菌计数(<100 cfu/mL)、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌和环境链球菌计数(<500 cfu/mL)以及非大肠菌群计数(<200 cfu/mL)也显著较低。大肠菌群计数与体细胞或其他细菌计数的相关性较小。牛群规模和农场管理方式对贮奶罐牛奶中的体细胞和细菌计数有相当大的影响。使用自动挤奶器、用沙子作为垫料、用浸杯而不是喷雾进行乳头浸药、并进行浸药前后处理的奶牛场,其贮奶罐体细胞和/或细菌计数显著较低。总之,分类的贮奶罐体细胞和细菌计数可作为指标,有助于监测牛群乳房健康和牛奶质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验