Murphy S, Denman S, Bennett R G, Greenough W B, Lindsay J, Zelesnick L B
Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992 Mar;40(3):213-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb02070.x.
To study the prevalence and risk factors for colonization with MRSA at a long-term-care facility.
Cross-sectional surveillance culture survey.
A 233-bed university-affiliated long-term-care facility.
Surveillance cultures for MRSA were performed on patients of two adjacent nursing units and on new admissions to the entire facility over a 4-month period.
On the chronic medical unit, where patients known to be colonized had been cohorted, 20 of 38 (52.6%) were colonized vs 3 of 67 (4.5%) on the skilled/intermediate unit (P less than 0.001), suggesting that little intra-facility spread of MRSA occurs. Twenty-four of 55 (43.6%) chronic medical admissions were colonized vs 6 of 63 (9.5%) admitted to the other units (P less than 0.001). Thirteen of 30 (43.3%) admissions were not previously known to be colonized. By univariate analysis, colonized admissions were younger and more often male; had more listed diagnoses, including pressure sores, a previous positive MRSA culture, and urinary incontinence; were more often fed by feeding tube; and had longer durations of hospital stay prior to admission. Logistic regression analysis showed that the most powerful independent predictors of colonization at admission were: a prior positive culture for MRSA (OR 8.8, 95% CI 2.4, 32.4), male sex (OR 8.2, 95% CI 2.3, 29.7), urinary incontinence (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.4, 10.4), and presence of pressure sores (OR 2.9, 95% CI 0.9, 9.2).
Unrecognized colonization of nursing home residents with MRSA is common, and nursing homes are unwittingly repositories for patients colonized with MRSA following acute hospitalization. Gloving and careful attention to handwashing may limit spread of MRSA within nursing homes, and identification of colonized patients may be facilitated by targeted surveillance cultures of the most debilitated patients at admission.
研究一家长期护理机构中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)定植的患病率及危险因素。
横断面监测培养调查。
一家拥有233张床位的大学附属长期护理机构。
在4个月的时间里,对两个相邻护理单元的患者以及整个机构的新入院患者进行了MRSA监测培养。
在已知有定植患者的慢性医疗单元,38名患者中有20名(52.6%)被定植,而在熟练护理/中级护理单元的67名患者中有3名(4.5%)被定植(P<0.001),这表明MRSA在机构内的传播很少。55名慢性医疗入院患者中有24名(43.6%)被定植,而其他单元的63名入院患者中有6名(9.5%)被定植(P<0.001)。30名入院患者中有13名(43.3%)之前未知被定植。单因素分析显示,被定植的入院患者更年轻,男性更常见;有更多列出的诊断,包括压疮、既往MRSA培养阳性和尿失禁;更常通过鼻饲管进食;入院前住院时间更长。逻辑回归分析表明,入院时定植的最有力独立预测因素为:既往MRSA培养阳性(比值比8.8,95%可信区间2.4,32.4)、男性(比值比8.2,95%可信区间2.3,29.7)、尿失禁(比值比3.8,95%可信区间1.4,10.4)和压疮的存在(比值比2.9,95%可信区间0.9,9.2)。
养老院居民未被识别的MRSA定植很常见,养老院在急性住院后不知不觉中成了MRSA定植患者的储存库。戴手套和认真注意洗手可能会限制MRSA在养老院中的传播,对入院时最虚弱患者进行针对性监测培养可能有助于识别定植患者。