Skandalakis John E, Mirilas Petros
Centers for Surgical Anatomy and Technique, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Arch Surg. 2004 Sep;139(9):1022-4. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.9.1022.
The theft of someone's words or thoughts--plagiarism--has long been a concern in medical literature. The phenomenon applies to unreferenced published or unpublished data that belong to someone else, including applications for grants and a publication submitted in a different language. Other acts of plagiarism are paraphrasing without crediting the source, using "blanket" references, "second-generation" references, and duplicate or repetitive publication of one's own previously published work. Does incorporating a peer reviewer's ideas constitute plagiarism? The requirement of many journals for a short list of references is problematic, as is confusion about what constitutes common knowledge. What criteria should be used for detecting plagiarism? To make an accusation of plagiarism is serious and perilous. Motivations for plagiarism are considered, and 2 striking historical examples of plagiarism are summarized. We believe that with insight into its causes and effects, plagiarism can be eliminated.
盗用他人的文字或思想——即剽窃——长期以来一直是医学文献领域所关注的问题。这种现象适用于未经引用的已发表或未发表的、属于他人的数据,包括科研基金申请以及用另一种语言提交的出版物。其他剽窃行为包括在未注明出处的情况下进行意译、使用“笼统”参考文献、“第二代”参考文献,以及重复发表自己以前已发表的作品。采纳同行评审者的观点是否构成剽窃?许多期刊对简短参考文献列表的要求存在问题,对于什么构成常识的界定也很模糊。应该使用哪些标准来检测剽窃行为?指控剽窃是严肃且危险的。文中探讨了剽窃的动机,并总结了两个引人注目的历史上的剽窃案例。我们认为,深入了解剽窃的因果关系,就能杜绝剽窃行为。