Julliard K
Christine M. Kleinert Institute for Hand and Micro Surgery, Louisville, KY.
Fam Med. 1994 Jun;26(6):356-60.
Some authors do not place quotation marks around words used verbatim from another source. The purpose of this study was to determine if physician faculty, English faculty, editors, and medical students would: 1) consider it plagiarism to use selected samples of verbatim or paraphrased text from a published medical journal article (without quotation marks but with citation of the original work) and 2) consider this an important type of plagiarism.
A questionnaire was circulated to medical school faculty, English faculty, health care and non-health care editors, and medical students. Respondents compared writing samples with an original article and determined if any samples displayed plagiarism. (All samples were plagiarism according to published guidelines).
The majority of physicians did not perceive any of the samples as being plagiarism and did not consider this type of plagiarism important. The reverse was true of the majority of medical students, English faculty, and nonphysician editors.
While perceptions varied widely within and among all groups studied, some physician faculty members and many other publishing professionals and medical students regard the use of verbatim text from another author without quotation marks as a serious form of plagiarism.
一些作者在逐字引用其他来源的文字时不使用引号。本研究的目的是确定医学教师、英语教师、编辑和医学生是否会：1）将从已发表的医学期刊文章中选取的逐字或意译文本样本（不使用引号但引用原始作品）视为抄袭，以及2）将其视为一种重要的抄袭类型。
向医学院教师、英语教师、医疗保健和非医疗保健编辑以及医学生发放问卷。受访者将写作样本与原始文章进行比较，并确定是否有任何样本存在抄袭现象。（根据已发表的指南，所有样本均存在抄袭）。
大多数医生不认为任何样本存在抄袭，也不认为这种抄袭类型很重要。大多数医学生、英语教师和非医生编辑的看法则相反。
虽然在所研究的所有群体内部和群体之间看法差异很大，但一些医学教师以及许多其他出版专业人员和医学生将未加引号使用其他作者的逐字文本视为一种严重的抄袭形式。
