• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Was apnea monitor on or off? Expert testimony. Case in point: Dent v. Memorial Hosp. of Adel, Inc. (408 S.E.2d 473--GA (1991)).

作者信息

Tammelleo A D

出版信息

Regan Rep Nurs Law. 1992 Jan;32(8):2.

PMID:1542727
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Was apnea monitor on or off? Expert testimony. Case in point: Dent v. Memorial Hosp. of Adel, Inc. (408 S.E.2d 473--GA (1991)).
Regan Rep Nurs Law. 1992 Jan;32(8):2.
2
Nurse changes testimony & notes: credibility issue. Case in point: Georgia Osteopathic Hosp. v. O'Neal (403 S.E. 2d 235--GA (1991)).护士更改证词及记录：可信度问题。例证：佐治亚整骨医院诉奥尼尔案（《佐治亚州东南部地区法院案例汇编》第403卷，第2辑，第235页——佐治亚州（1991年））。
Regan Rep Nurs Law. 1991 Aug;32(3):2.
3
Legal case briefs for nurses. GA: failure to monitor intubated patient: "physician testimony" on nursing standares; FL: Board adopts Dr.'s "surgical care rule": nurses lack standing at hearings.护士的法律案例摘要。佐治亚州：未能监测插管患者：关于护理标准的“医生证词”；佛罗里达州：委员会采用医生的“手术护理规则”：护士在听证会上没有发言权。
Regan Rep Nurs Law. 1993 Jul;34(2):3.
4
GA: failure to turn apnea monitor on: 'ordinary' or 'professional' negligence?GA：未开启呼吸暂停监测仪：“一般”还是“专业”过失？
Regan Rep Nurs Law. 1999 Apr;39(11):3.
5
Vicarious liability for nurses: "borrowed servant" doctrine. Case in point: Parker v. Hosp. Auth. of City of Bainbridge 446 S.E.2d 766--GA (1994).
Regan Rep Nurs Law. 1994 Oct;35(5):2.
6
"Poor nursing practice": expert opinions. Case in point: Breit v. St. Luke's Memorial Hosp. (743 P. 2d 1254--WA).“糟糕的护理行为”：专家意见。例证：布赖特诉圣卢克纪念医院案（《太平洋判例汇编》第2辑，第743卷，第1254页——华盛顿州）
Regan Rep Nurs Law. 1987 Dec;28(7):4.
7
GA: is alleged negligence same as malpractice?: is expert medical testimony needed for negligence?GA：所谓的过失与医疗事故是否相同？：过失是否需要医学专家证词？
Nurs Law Regan Rep. 2004 Feb;44(9):3.
8
Physicians retract opinion: nurses not negligent. Case in point: Galloway v. Baton Rouge General Hosp. (583 So. 2d 1169--LA (1991)).
Regan Rep Nurs Law. 1991 Nov;32(6):4.
9
Nurses fail to communicate: death results. Case in point: Hodges v. Effingham County Hosp. Auth. (355 S.E. 2d 104-GA).
Regan Rep Nurs Law. 1987 Jun;28(1):4.
10
Death after E.R. treatment: proximate cause issue. Case in point: Godeaux v. Rayne Branch Hosp. (606 So. 2d 948--LA [1992]).急诊治疗后的死亡：近因问题。相关案例：戈德奥诉雷恩分校医院案（606 So. 2d 948——路易斯安那州[1992]）
Regan Rep Nurs Law. 1993 Feb;33(9):4.