Suppr超能文献

儿童死亡风险(PRISM)评分的前瞻性评估。

Prospective evaluation of the Paediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) score.

作者信息

Balakrishnan G, Aitchison T, Hallworth D, Morton N S

机构信息

Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Glasgow.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child. 1992 Feb;67(2):196-200. doi: 10.1136/adc.67.2.196.

Abstract

The performance of the admission day Paediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) score for outcome prediction was assessed prospectively in 270 consecutive admissions, aged 3 days to 18.6 years, to a paediatric intensive care unit. Using a cut off of r = 0.00 (expected mortality = 50%), the overall sensitivity (correct prediction of death) was 48% while specificity (correct prediction of survival) was 99%, comparable with the original validation data of the score in the USA. Outcome prediction was most accurate when the stay in the paediatric intensive care unit was between one and four days. Sensitivity was appreciably lower for operative patients (17%) compared with non-operative patients (71%) because of a failure to predict deaths after cardiac surgery. The sensitivity (41%) and specificity (99%) using five variables (systolic blood pressure, Glasgow coma scale, carbon dioxide tension, and serum bicarbonate and serum calcium concentrations) was similar to that using all 14 variables. Six variable ranges related differently with non-survival compared with the score. It is concluded that the performance of the PRISM score is institution independent and good for short stay patients. It underpredicts deaths after cardiac surgery. Only five variables may be needed for satisfactory outcome prediction. Some of the variables need reweighting for paediatric intensive care units in the UK.

摘要

对一家儿科重症监护病房连续收治的270例年龄在3天至18.6岁之间的患儿进行了前瞻性评估,以确定入院当天的儿科死亡风险(PRISM)评分对预后预测的性能。使用截断值r = 0.00(预期死亡率 = 50%)时,总体敏感性(正确预测死亡)为48%,而特异性(正确预测存活)为99%,与该评分在美国的原始验证数据相当。当患儿在儿科重症监护病房的住院时间为1至4天时,预后预测最为准确。由于未能预测心脏手术后的死亡情况,手术患者的敏感性(17%)明显低于非手术患者(71%)。使用五个变量(收缩压、格拉斯哥昏迷量表、二氧化碳分压、血清碳酸氢盐和血清钙浓度)时的敏感性(41%)和特异性(99%)与使用全部14个变量时相似。与该评分相比,六个变量范围与非存活情况的相关性有所不同。得出的结论是,PRISM评分的性能与机构无关,对短期住院患者效果良好。它对心脏手术后的死亡预测不足。满意的预后预测可能仅需要五个变量。英国的儿科重症监护病房需要对一些变量重新加权。

相似文献

2
PRISM III: an updated Pediatric Risk of Mortality score.PRISM III:更新后的儿童死亡风险评分
Crit Care Med. 1996 May;24(5):743-52. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199605000-00004.

引用本文的文献

9
External validation of the paediatric logistic organ dysfunction score.儿科 LOGIST 器官功能障碍评分的外部验证。
Intensive Care Med. 2010 Jan;36(1):116-22. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1489-1. Epub 2009 Apr 10.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验