• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护病房的个体预后预测模型。

Individual outcome prediction models for intensive care units.

作者信息

Chang R W

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Riyadh Armed Forces Hospital, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Lancet. 1989 Jul 15;2(8655):143-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90193-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90193-1
PMID:2567904
Abstract

Prognostic criteria based on static analysis of group statistics do not help much in decisions to withhold or withdraw therapy from intensive care unit (ICU) patients too ill to benefit, since they do not provide adequate information on the features that distinguish non-survivors from survivors. A predictive model which uses dynamic analysis of severity scores based on physiological variables is presented here along with the results of tests of the model in 831 ICU patients. 109 patients were correctly predicted to die by the model. Of 722 whose prediction was outcome unknown, 181 died. Thus, the odds for prediction of death among non-survivors were 0.376. Since there were no false predictions of death, the estimated chance of a false prediction was 0.0055.

摘要

基于群体统计静态分析的预后标准,对于那些病情过重而无法获益的重症监护病房(ICU)患者,在决定停止或撤销治疗时帮助不大,因为它们并未提供足够的信息来区分非幸存者和幸存者的特征。本文提出了一种基于生理变量对严重程度评分进行动态分析的预测模型,以及该模型在831例ICU患者中的测试结果。该模型正确预测了109例患者死亡。在722例预测结果未知的患者中,181例死亡。因此,非幸存者中死亡预测的比值为0.376。由于没有死亡的错误预测,估计错误预测的概率为0.0055。

相似文献

1
Individual outcome prediction models for intensive care units.重症监护病房的个体预后预测模型。
Lancet. 1989 Jul 15;2(8655):143-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90193-1.
2
Accuracy of decisions to withdraw therapy in critically ill patients: clinical judgment versus a computer model.重症患者撤掉治疗措施决策的准确性:临床判断与计算机模型对比
Crit Care Med. 1989 Nov;17(11):1091-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198911000-00001.
3
Intensive care unit admission of decompensated cirrhotic patients: prognostic scoring systems.失代偿期肝硬化患者入住重症监护病房:预后评分系统
Transplant Proc. 2011 May;43(4):1079-84. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.01.153.
4
The Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS) versus the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in outcome prediction.多器官功能障碍评分(MODS)与序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分在预后预测中的比较。
Intensive Care Med. 2002 Nov;28(11):1619-24. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1491-3. Epub 2002 Sep 6.
5
Dynamic Bayesian Networks to predict sequences of organ failures in patients admitted to ICU.动态贝叶斯网络预测 ICU 收治患者器官衰竭的序列。
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Apr;48:106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.12.008. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
6
Performance evaluation of APACHE II score for an Indian patient with respiratory problems.用于评估印度呼吸疾病患者的急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)的性能评价
Indian J Med Res. 2004 Jun;119(6):273-82.
7
Multicenter study of the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in intensive care units: the usefulness of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores in decision making.重症监护病房多器官功能障碍综合征的多中心研究:序贯器官衰竭评估评分在决策中的作用。
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Jul;31(7):927-33. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2640-2. Epub 2005 Apr 26.
8
Dynamic microsimulation to model multiple outcomes in cohorts of critically ill patients.动态微观模拟用于对危重症患者队列中的多种结局进行建模。
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Dec;30(12):2237-44. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2456-5. Epub 2004 Oct 21.
9
Early hospital mortality prediction of intensive care unit patients using an ensemble learning approach.基于集成学习方法的重症监护病房患者早期住院病死率预测。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Dec;108:185-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
10
Oncological patients in the intensive care unit: prognosis, decision-making, therapies and end-of-life care.重症监护病房中的肿瘤患者:预后、决策、治疗与临终关怀。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2017 Aug 14;147:w14481. doi: 10.4414/smw.2017.14481. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of Emergency Surgery Score (ESS) as outcome prediction score in Egyptian patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.急诊手术评分(ESS)作为埃及接受急诊剖腹手术患者结局预测评分的验证
Int J Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 7;18(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12245-025-00934-z.
2
Clinical decision-making and secondary findings in systems medicine.系统医学中的临床决策与次要发现
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 May 21;17(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0113-5.
3
Assessing the risk: Scoring systems for outcome prediction in emergency laparotomies.评估风险:急诊剖腹手术中预后预测的评分系统。
Biomedicine (Taipei). 2015 Dec;5(4):20. doi: 10.7603/s40681-015-0020-y. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
4
Prognostic categorization of intensive care septic patients.重症监护病房脓毒症患者的预后分类
World J Crit Care Med. 2012 Jun 4;1(3):67-79. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v1.i3.67.
5
Prognostic physiology: modeling patient severity in Intensive Care Units using radial domain folding.预后生理学:使用径向域折叠对重症监护病房患者的严重程度进行建模。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012;2012:1276-83. Epub 2012 Nov 3.
6
The empirical basis for determinations of medical futility.医疗无效性判断的经验基础。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Oct;25(10):1083-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1445-3. Epub 2010 Jul 20.
7
Prediction of clinical conditions after coronary bypass surgery using dynamic data analysis.应用动态数据分析预测冠状动脉旁路手术后的临床状况。
J Med Syst. 2010 Jun;34(3):229-39. doi: 10.1007/s10916-008-9234-9.
8
Cardiac ECMO for biventricular hearts after paediatric open heart surgery.小儿心脏直视手术后双心室心脏的体外膜肺氧合支持
Heart. 2004 May;90(5):545-51. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2002.003509.
9
Comparison of APACHE II, MEES and Glasgow Coma Scale in patients with nontraumatic coma for prediction of mortality. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation. Mainz Emergency Evaluation System.急性生理与慢性健康状况评估Ⅱ(APACHE II)、美因茨急诊评估系统(MEES)与格拉斯哥昏迷量表在非创伤性昏迷患者中预测死亡率的比较。急性生理与慢性健康评估。美因茨急诊评估系统。
Crit Care. 2001;5(1):19-23. doi: 10.1186/cc973. Epub 2000 Dec 14.
10
Evaluation of the Glasgow Coma Scale score in critically ill infectious disease patients.危重症感染性疾病患者格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分的评估
Infection. 1996 Jul-Aug;24(4):297-300. doi: 10.1007/BF01743364.