Williard W C, Hajdu S I, Casper E S, Brennan M F
Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021.
Ann Surg. 1992 Mar;215(3):269-75. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199203000-00012.
The use of amputation in extremity soft tissue sarcoma has been decreasing at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) over the last 15 years. In an attempt to define the efficacy and future role of amputation in extremity soft tissue sarcoma, a prospective sarcoma database compiled at MSKCC from July 1982 to January 1990, consisting of 649 patients, was analyzed in a retrospective fashion. Ninety-two patients underwent amputation, and 557 had a limb-sparing procedure. Patients selected for amputation were those who had large (T greater than or equal to 5 cm) high-grade tumors that invaded major vascular or nervous structures. The amputation group achieved significantly better local control than the limb-sparing group (p = 0.007). No survival benefit could be demonstrated, however, in the groups selected for amputation (i.e., large, high-grade tumors) when compared with patients undergoing a limb-sparing procedure with similar tumors. Prevention of local recurrence by amputation also did not improve survival in this group compared with similar patients undergoing limb-sparing surgery who did develop a local recurrence. The group of patients with high-grade tumors 10 cm or larger who received chemotherapy did have a significant improvement in survival (p = 0.01) compared with a similar group of patients who did not receive chemotherapy, regardless of the type of operation. The prognosis of patients most likely to undergo an amputation for extremity soft tissue sarcoma (those with high-grade, large tumors) is not related to their local disease, but rather to the risk of distant metastases. Therefore, amputation in this cohort of patients can be recommended only when a limb-sparing procedure cannot achieve gross resection of tumor while still preserving a useful extremity, because amputation improves only local control and does not address distant disease. Further improvement in survival in this group of patients will be dependent on better systemic treatment for extremity soft tissue sarcoma, and not on more radical surgery.
在过去15年中,纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心(MSKCC)对肢体软组织肉瘤实施截肢手术的比例一直在下降。为了明确截肢手术在肢体软组织肉瘤治疗中的疗效及未来作用,我们对MSKCC于1982年7月至1990年1月收集的一个前瞻性肉瘤数据库进行了回顾性分析,该数据库包含649例患者。其中92例患者接受了截肢手术,557例接受了保肢手术。选择截肢的患者是那些患有大(肿瘤直径T≥5 cm)的高级别肿瘤且侵犯主要血管或神经结构的患者。截肢组的局部控制效果明显优于保肢组(p = 0.007)。然而,与接受保肢手术的类似肿瘤患者相比,选择截肢的患者组(即大的高级别肿瘤患者)并未显示出生存获益。与发生局部复发的接受保肢手术的类似患者相比,通过截肢预防局部复发也未改善该组患者的生存情况。无论手术类型如何,接受化疗的肿瘤直径10 cm或更大的高级别肿瘤患者组与未接受化疗的类似患者组相比,生存情况有显著改善(p = 0.01)。最有可能因肢体软组织肉瘤接受截肢手术的患者(即高级别、大肿瘤患者)的预后与局部疾病无关,而与远处转移风险有关。因此,仅当保肢手术无法在保留有用肢体的同时实现肿瘤的大体切除时,才建议对这组患者进行截肢,因为截肢仅能改善局部控制,而无法解决远处疾病问题。这组患者生存情况的进一步改善将依赖于对肢体软组织肉瘤更好的全身治疗,而非更激进的手术。