Patak Lance, Gawlinski Anna, Fung Ng Irene, Doering Lynn, Berg Jill
University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Heart Lung. 2004 Sep-Oct;33(5):308-20. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2004.02.002.
The literature supports nursing interventions to maximize communication in mechanically ventilated patients, yet limited research exists on patients' perceptions of the helpfulness of health care practitioner interventions to enhance communication. In addition, the level of frustration experienced by these patients has not been reported. Thus, further research is necessary to examine patients' perspectives of the helpfulness of health care practitioner interventions that enhance communication of the mechanically ventilated patient.
This study describes the level of frustration experienced by mechanically ventilated patients and ascertains the helpfulness of methods used by health care practitioners to meet the communication needs of the mechanically ventilated patient.
A total of 29 critically ill patients, extubated within the last 72 hours, were included in this descriptive study using qualitative and quantitative methods. Subjects participated in an average 30-minute audiotaped interview session consisting of questions pertinent to their perceived level of frustration in communicating and the interventions practitioners used to meet their communication needs. Transcripts were analyzed by question and for overall themes.
It was found that 62% of patients (n = 18) reported a high level of frustration in communicating their needs while being mechanically ventilated. There was no significant difference between the duration of intubation and the level of frustration (Spearman r =.109, P =.573) or between the diagnosis and the level of frustration (P =.932). Patients who received anxiolytics (n = 23, 79% of the sample) had a lower level of frustration (mean 3.26) than those who did not receive anxiolytics (n = 6, 21% of the sample, mean 4.33). This difference trended toward significance (P =.084). Patients cited health care practitioner behaviors, characteristics, and attributes that both facilitated communication (kind, informative, and physically present at the bedside) and impeded their ability to communicate (mechanical, inattentive, and "absent" from the bedside). Patients reported problems and stresses associated with communication difficulties that can be alleviated by the health care practitioner.
Mechanically ventilated patients experience a high level of frustration when communicating their needs, and health care providers have a significant impact on the mechanically ventilated patient's experience. Further research is needed to explore and measure methods of facilitating communication that increase patient satisfaction, reduce patient anxiety, and obtain optimal pain management.
文献支持护理干预措施以最大限度地促进机械通气患者的沟通,但关于患者对医护人员为增强沟通所采取干预措施的有用性的看法的研究有限。此外,这些患者所经历的沮丧程度尚未见报道。因此,有必要进一步开展研究,以考察患者对医护人员为促进机械通气患者沟通所采取干预措施的有用性的看法。
本研究描述机械通气患者所经历的沮丧程度,并确定医护人员为满足机械通气患者沟通需求所采用方法的有用性。
本描述性研究采用定性和定量方法,纳入了29例在过去72小时内拔管的重症患者。受试者参加了平均时长为30分钟的录音访谈,访谈问题涉及他们在沟通中所感知的沮丧程度以及医护人员为满足其沟通需求所采取的干预措施。对访谈记录按问题和总体主题进行分析。
发现62%的患者(n = 18)报告在机械通气时表达需求存在高度沮丧感。插管时长与沮丧程度之间(斯皮尔曼r = 0.109,P = 0.573)或诊断与沮丧程度之间(P = 0.932)无显著差异。接受抗焦虑药治疗的患者(n = 23,占样本的79%)的沮丧程度(平均3.26)低于未接受抗焦虑药治疗的患者(n = 6,占样本的21%,平均4.33)。这种差异有趋于显著的趋势(P = 0.084)。患者列举了医护人员有助于沟通的行为、特征和品质(亲切、提供信息、床边在场)以及妨碍他们沟通能力的行为、特征和品质(机械、注意力不集中、床边“不在场”)。患者报告了与沟通困难相关的问题和压力,而医护人员可以缓解这些问题和压力。
机械通气患者在表达需求时会经历高度沮丧感,医护人员对机械通气患者的体验有重大影响。需要进一步开展研究,以探索和衡量促进沟通的方法,从而提高患者满意度、减轻患者焦虑并实现最佳疼痛管理。