Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Nurs Crit Care. 2018 Mar;23(2):88-94. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12297. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
To explore non-sedated mechanically ventilated patients' communication with nurses in the intensive care unit.
Mechanically ventilated patients are temporarily voiceless, making interpersonal communication complex. Both nurses and patients find communication challenging and may experience negative emotions when communication fails. In Nordic countries, sedation protocols have changed to light/non-sedation, resulting in more patients being conscious and more clinical practitioners experiencing communication difficulties.
The study was qualitative with a phenomenological-hermeneutic approach. Data were collected at two intensive care units in Denmark from January to April 2015.
Data collection consisted of interviews with patients, focus group interviews with nurses and field observations concerning nurse-patient communication. Data were analysed as one collective body of data using Ricoeur's theory of interpretation.
The main theme showed that communication is a movement between the two opposite feelings of comprehension and frustration. Sub-themes showed (1) the dynamics of power change when the patient is voiceless; (2) consciousness and voicelessness make caring difficult; and (3) the process of interpreting and structuring communication is situational.
These findings are important in nursing care and provide perspectives on the shift from communication towards comprehension and, thus, away from frustration. A non-sedation protocol is a major change in clinical practice in relation to communication. It requires a new way of thinking where communication becomes an integrated part of care, and the nurse has to be constantly alert and adjust his or her communication strategies to the patient's changing needs and communication ability.
Some nursing interventions may optimize communication: (1) systematic assessment of patients' communication; (2) education of nurses in Augmentative and Alternative Communication; (3) using communication tools when possible; and (4) securing time, continuity, empathy and patience in nursing care.
探索重症监护病房非镇静机械通气患者与护士的沟通。
机械通气患者暂时无法发声,使人际沟通变得复杂。护士和患者都发现沟通具有挑战性,当沟通失败时,他们可能会感到负面情绪。在北欧国家,镇静方案已改为轻度/非镇静,导致更多的患者有意识,更多的临床医生面临沟通困难。
这是一项定性研究,采用现象学-解释学方法。数据于 2015 年 1 月至 4 月在丹麦的两家重症监护病房收集。
数据收集包括对患者的访谈、护士的焦点小组访谈以及关于护士-患者沟通的现场观察。数据作为一个整体使用 Ricoeur 的解释理论进行分析。
主要主题表明,沟通是理解和挫折两种相反感觉之间的一种运动。子主题表明:(1) 当患者无法发声时,权力动态发生变化;(2) 意识和无法发声使护理变得困难;(3) 解释和构建沟通的过程是情境性的。
这些发现对护理工作很重要,为从沟通转向理解,从而避免挫折提供了视角。非镇静方案是临床实践中沟通方面的重大变化。它需要一种新的思维方式,其中沟通成为护理的一个组成部分,护士必须时刻保持警惕,并根据患者不断变化的需求和沟通能力调整沟通策略。
一些护理干预措施可能会优化沟通:(1) 对患者沟通进行系统评估;(2) 对护士进行辅助和替代沟通的教育;(3) 在可能的情况下使用沟通工具;(4) 在护理中确保时间、连续性、同理心和耐心。