Lattier G, Millet G Y, Martin A, Martin V
Faculty of Sport Sciences-University of Burgundy, 21078 Dijon Cedex, France.
Int J Sports Med. 2004 Oct;25(7):509-15. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-820946.
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of three types of recovery intervention to neuromuscular function after high-intensity uphill running exercise. The 20-min recovery interventions were (i) passive, (ii) active (running at 50 % of maximal aerobic speed), and (iii) low-frequency electromyostimulation. Evoked twitch and maximal voluntary contractions of knee extensor muscles (KE) and EMG of the vastus lateralis and vastus medialis were analysed immediately after the exercise, 10 min after the end of the recovery periods, and 65 min after the exercise (Post65). An all-out running test was also performed 80 min after the end of the fatiguing exercise. No significant differences were noted in any measured parameters but a tendency to a better performance during the all-out test was found after the electromyostimulation intervention (297.5 +/- 152.4 s vs. 253.6 +/- 117.1 s and 260.3 +/- 105.8 s after active and passive recovery, p = 0.13 and p = 0.12, respectively). At Post65, isometric maximal voluntary contraction torque did not return to the pre-exercise values (279.7 +/- 86.5 vs. 298.7 +/- 92.6 Nm, respectively; p < 0.05). During recovery, electrically evoked twitch was characterized by an increase of peak torque, maximal rate of force development and relaxation (+ 24 - 33 %; p < 0.001) but these values were still lower at Post65 than pre-exercise. Amplitude and surface of the M-wave decreased during recovery. These results show that the recovery of the voluntary force-generating capacity of KE after an intermittent high-intensity uphill running exercise do not depend on the type of recovery intervention tested here. It can also be concluded that the recovery of twitch contractile properties does not necessarily follow that of maximal muscle strength.
本研究的目的是确定三种恢复干预措施对高强度上坡跑步运动后神经肌肉功能的影响。20分钟的恢复干预措施包括:(i)被动恢复,(ii)主动恢复(以最大有氧速度的50%跑步),以及(iii)低频肌电刺激。在运动结束后、恢复阶段结束后10分钟以及运动后65分钟(Post65),立即分析股四头肌(KE)的诱发抽搐和最大自主收缩以及股外侧肌和股内侧肌的肌电图。在疲劳运动结束后80分钟还进行了全力跑步测试。在任何测量参数中均未发现显著差异,但在肌电刺激干预后,在全力测试中发现有表现更好的趋势(分别为297.5±152.4秒,主动恢复和被动恢复后分别为253.6±117.1秒和260.3±105.8秒,p分别为0.13和0.12)。在Post65时,等长最大自主收缩扭矩未恢复到运动前的值(分别为279.7±86.5与298.7±92.6牛米;p<0.05)。在恢复过程中,电诱发抽搐的特征是峰值扭矩、最大力量发展速率和放松增加(+24 - 33%;p<0.001),但这些值在Post65时仍低于运动前。M波的幅度和面积在恢复过程中减小。这些结果表明,间歇性高强度上坡跑步运动后股四头肌的自主力量生成能力的恢复不依赖于此处测试的恢复干预类型。还可以得出结论,抽搐收缩特性的恢复不一定与最大肌肉力量的恢复一致。