Macher J P, Mirabaud C
CHS Rouffach, France.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1992;106 Suppl:S116-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02246252.
A randomized, double-blind, multicentre study was performed to compare the effects of moclobemide and amineptine in the treatment of endogenous depression in out-patients. Ninety patients received moclobemide, 450 mg/day and 94 received amineptine 200 mg/day in two parallel groups, over a trial period of 8 weeks. At the end of 4 weeks doses could be reduced to 300 mg/day, moclobemide and 100 mg/day, amineptine if required. All evaluated patients showed a significant clinical improvement during treatment, but no significant difference occurred between the groups. When patients were asked to assess the benefit of their treatment, 76% thought their condition had improved following moclobemide therapy, compared to 53% of those receiving amineptine. Both drugs were well tolerated, and over 60% of patients reported no side-effects. Moclobemide appeared to be as effective as amineptine in the treatment of these patients, and was significantly better tolerated.
开展了一项随机、双盲、多中心研究,以比较吗氯贝胺和阿密曲替林治疗门诊内源性抑郁症的效果。90名患者接受吗氯贝胺治疗,剂量为每日450毫克,94名患者接受阿密曲替林治疗,剂量为每日200毫克,分两个平行组,试验期为8周。在4周结束时,如果需要,吗氯贝胺剂量可减至每日300毫克,阿密曲替林减至每日100毫克。所有接受评估的患者在治疗期间均有显著的临床改善,但两组之间无显著差异。当患者被要求评估其治疗效果时,76%的患者认为接受吗氯贝胺治疗后病情有所改善,而接受阿密曲替林治疗的患者这一比例为53%。两种药物耐受性均良好,超过60%的患者报告无副作用。吗氯贝胺在治疗这些患者方面似乎与阿密曲替林一样有效,且耐受性明显更好。