Versiani M, Nardi A E, Mundim F D, Alves A, Schmid-Burgk W
Programa de Ansiedade e Depressao, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1990;360:57-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb05331.x.
Moclobemide was compared with imipramine and placebo in the treatment of major depressive episodes in 75 outpatients. The dosage of moclobemide (25 patients) was 300 mg daily for the first 5 days, after which it could be increased to 600 mg. Imipramine (25 patients) was given in a dosage starting with 33 mg and gradually increased to 100 mg/day in the first 5 days, after which it could be further increased; 25 patients received placebo. Both drugs were equally effective as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, the overall assessment of efficacy and the Zung Self-rating Scale, and clearly superior to placebo; there were no significant differences between the 2 active drugs. Moclobemide was better tolerated than imipramine, and was almost comparable to placebo in this respect.
将75名门诊患者的重度抑郁发作治疗中,对吗氯贝胺与丙咪嗪及安慰剂进行了比较。吗氯贝胺组(25例患者)前5天每日剂量为300mg,之后可增至600mg。丙咪嗪组(25例患者)开始剂量为33mg,前5天逐渐增至100mg/天,之后还可进一步增加;25例患者接受安慰剂治疗。根据汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表、疗效总体评估及zung自评量表测量,两种药物疗效相当,且均明显优于安慰剂;两种活性药物之间无显著差异。吗氯贝胺耐受性优于丙咪嗪,在这方面与安慰剂几乎相当。