Suppr超能文献

在普通门诊抑郁症患者中比较吗氯贝胺与氯米帕明:一项随机、双盲、平行、多中心研究。

Moclobemide versus clomipramine in depressed patients in general practice. A randomized, double-blind, parallel, multicenter study.

作者信息

Kragh-Sørensen P, Müller B, Andersen J V, Buch D, Stage K B

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1995 Aug;15(4 Suppl 2):24S-30S. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199508001-00005.

Abstract

In a double-blind, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial in general practice, lasting 7 weeks, a fixed dose of moclobemide (400 mg daily) was compared with a fixed dose of clomipramine (150 mg daily). A total of 147 patients with DSM-III-R major depression were included in the study. After a 1-week drug-free washout period, patients were stratified, according to total scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), into two groups--HAM-D total scores, 11 to 15 points, and HAM-D total scores, 16 points or more. A comparison of the therapeutic effect of the two treatments was based on HAM-D total scores and the classification of patients into therapeutic response categories defined on the basis of total rating score, complete response, HAM-D < or = 7 points; partial response, HAM-D, 8 to 15 points; or no response, HAM-D > or = 16 points. The Newcastle Diagnostic Rating Scale (1965) was used to classify the patients into two groups, endogenous and nonendogenous. Adverse events were registered by use of the UKU side effect scale. Clinical global assessments of severity, efficacy, and tolerance were completed during the active treatment period. Compliance to treatment was based on levels of the drugs in plasma and the number of returned capsules. One hundred forty-two patients were evaluated for clinical effects. The results of the efficacy analyses showed therapeutic equivalence between moclobemide and clomipramine. There were no differences in the outcome of the two treatment groups or the two diagnostic groups (endogenous and nonendogenous).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在一项为期7周的全科双盲、随机、对照、多中心临床试验中,将固定剂量的吗氯贝胺(每日400毫克)与固定剂量的氯米帕明(每日150毫克)进行比较。共有147例符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)重度抑郁症标准的患者纳入研究。经过1周的药物洗脱期后,根据汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)总分将患者分为两组——HAM-D总分11至15分,以及HAM-D总分16分及以上。两种治疗方法的疗效比较基于HAM-D总分,以及根据总评分将患者分类为治疗反应类别,即完全缓解,HAM-D≤7分;部分缓解,HAM-D为8至15分;或无反应,HAM-D≥16分。使用纽卡斯尔诊断量表(1965年)将患者分为内源性和非内源性两组。使用UKU副作用量表记录不良事件。在积极治疗期间完成对严重程度、疗效和耐受性的临床整体评估。治疗依从性基于血浆中的药物水平和回收胶囊的数量。对142例患者进行了临床疗效评估。疗效分析结果显示吗氯贝胺和氯米帕明疗效相当。两个治疗组或两个诊断组(内源性和非内源性)的结果没有差异。(摘要截选至250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验