• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在客观结构化临床考试中使用标准化患者作为患者安全工具。

Using standardised patients in an objective structured clinical examination as a patient safety tool.

作者信息

Battles J B, Wilkinson S L, Lee S J

机构信息

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, USA.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i46-50. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_1.i46.

DOI:10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_1.i46
PMID:15465955
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1765798/
Abstract

Standardised patients (SPs) are a powerful form of simulation that has now become commonplace in training and assessment in medical education throughout the world. Standardised patients are individuals, with or without actual disease, who have been trained to portray a medical case in a consistent manner. They are now the gold standard for measuring the competence of physicians and other health professionals, and the quality of their practice. A common way in which SPs are used in performance assessment has been as part of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). The use of an SP based OSCE can be a powerful tool in measuring continued competence in human reliability and skill performance where such skills are a critical attribute to maintaining patient safety. This article will describe how an OSCE could be used as a patient safety tool based on cases derived from actual events related to postdonation information in the blood collection process. The OSCE was developed as a competency examination for health history takers. Postdonation information events in the blood collection process account for the majority of errors reported to the US Food and Drug Administration. SP based assessment is an important patient safety tool that could be applied to a variety of patient safety settings and situations, and should be considered an important weapon in the war on medical error and patient harm.

摘要

标准化病人(SPs)是一种强大的模拟形式,如今在全球医学教育的培训和评估中已变得很常见。标准化病人是指经过训练以一致方式呈现医疗案例的个体,有无实际疾病均可。他们现在是衡量医生和其他卫生专业人员能力及其执业质量的金标准。标准化病人用于绩效评估的一种常见方式是作为客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)的一部分。基于标准化病人的客观结构化临床考试在衡量人类可靠性和技能表现方面的持续能力时,可成为一种强大工具,而这些技能是维护患者安全的关键属性。本文将描述如何将客观结构化临床考试用作一种患者安全工具,该工具基于从采血过程中与献血后信息相关的实际事件衍生出的案例。客观结构化临床考试最初是作为对健康史采集者的能力考试而开发的。采血过程中的献血后信息事件占向美国食品药品监督管理局报告的错误的大多数。基于标准化病人的评估是一种重要的患者安全工具,可应用于各种患者安全环境和情况,应被视为对抗医疗差错和患者伤害这场战争中的重要武器。

相似文献

1
Using standardised patients in an objective structured clinical examination as a patient safety tool.在客观结构化临床考试中使用标准化患者作为患者安全工具。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i46-50. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_1.i46.
2
Virtual patient simulation for prevention of medical error: beyond just technical upskilling.用于预防医疗差错的虚拟患者模拟:不仅仅是技术技能提升。
World Hosp Health Serv. 2008;44(3):36-9.
3
Simulated and standardized patients in OSCEs: achievements and challenges 1992-2003.客观结构化临床考试中的模拟患者与标准化患者:1992 - 2003年的成就与挑战
Med Teach. 2003 May;25(3):262-70. doi: 10.1080/0142159031000100300.
4
The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): AMEE Guide No. 81. Part I: an historical and theoretical perspective.客观结构化临床考试(OSCE):AMEE 指南第 81 号。第一部分:历史与理论视角。
Med Teach. 2013 Sep;35(9):e1437-46. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.818634.
5
Does the gender of the standardised patient influence candidate performance in an objective structured clinical examination?标准化病人的性别是否会影响客观结构化临床考试中的考生表现?
Med Educ. 2009 Jun;43(6):521-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03336.x.
6
Implementation of a web-based interactive virtual patient case simulation as a training and assessment tool for medical students.实施基于网络的交互式虚拟患者病例模拟,作为医学生的培训和评估工具。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:233-7.
7
Identifying and reducing errors with surgical simulation.通过手术模拟识别并减少错误。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i19-26. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_1.i19.
8
The effect of simulation learning as a quality initiative.模拟学习作为一项质量改进举措的效果。
Urol Nurs. 2008 Dec;28(6):471-3.
9
Improving patient safety by instructional systems design.通过教学系统设计提高患者安全。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Dec;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i25-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.015917.
10
Keeping it real! Enhancing realism in standardised patient OSCE stations.保持真实!提升标准化病人客观结构化临床考试环节的真实感。
Clin Teach. 2012 Dec;9(6):382-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2012.00626.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of an online tool for assessment of health care providers' management of suspected malaria in an area, where transmission has been interrupted.开发和验证一种在线工具,用于评估在传播已中断的地区卫生保健提供者对疑似疟疾的管理。
Malar J. 2022 Oct 27;21(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12936-022-04308-1.
2
Development and testing of an objective structured clinical exam (OSCE) to assess socio-cultural dimensions of patient safety competency.开发并测试一种客观结构化临床考试(OSCE),以评估患者安全能力的社会文化维度。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Mar;24(3):188-94. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003277. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
3
Unannounced standardized patients: a promising method of assessing patient-centered care in your health care system.未事先通知的标准化病人:一种评估您的医疗保健系统中以病人为中心的护理的有前景的方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr 5;14:157. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-157.
4
Development of the objective structured system-interaction examination.客观结构化系统交互考试的开发。
J Grad Med Educ. 2009 Sep;1(1):82-8. doi: 10.4300/01.01.0013.
5
Exploring situational awareness in diagnostic errors in primary care.探索初级保健中诊断错误的情境意识。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jan;21(1):30-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000310. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
6
A new method for the assessment of patient safety competencies during a medical school clerkship using an objective structured clinical examination.一种使用客观结构化临床考试评估医学生实习期间患者安全能力的新方法。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(7):1209-15. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322011000700015.
7
[Evaluation of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in surgery and orthopedics by medical students].
Unfallchirurg. 2010 Sep;113(9):726-30, 732-3. doi: 10.1007/s00113-009-1690-2.
8
Errors of diagnosis in pediatric practice: a multisite survey.儿科实践中的诊断错误:多站点调查。
Pediatrics. 2010 Jul;126(1):70-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3218. Epub 2010 Jun 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Organizing patient safety research to identify risks and hazards.组织患者安全研究以识别风险和危害。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Dec;12 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii2-7. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.suppl_2.ii2.
2
An objective structured clinical examination to evaluate health historian competencies.一项用于评估健康史询问能力的客观结构化临床考试。
Transfusion. 2003 Jan;43(1):34-41. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00275.x.
3
A system of analyzing medical errors to improve GME curricula and programs.一个用于分析医疗差错以改进毕业后医学教育课程和项目的系统。
Acad Med. 2001 Feb;76(2):125-33. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200102000-00008.
4
Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality.病例 vignettes、标准化患者与病历摘要的比较:三种质量测量方法的前瞻性验证研究
JAMA. 2000 Apr 5;283(13):1715-22. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.13.1715.
5
How to investigate and analyse clinical incidents: clinical risk unit and association of litigation and risk management protocol.如何调查与分析临床事件:临床风险部门以及诉讼与风险管理协议协会
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):777-81. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.777.
6
The attributes of medical event-reporting systems: experience with a prototype medical event-reporting system for transfusion medicine.医疗事件报告系统的属性:输血医学原型医疗事件报告系统的经验
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998 Mar;122(3):231-8.
7
Assessing clinical performance with standardized patients.使用标准化病人评估临床技能。
JAMA. 1997 Sep 3;278(9):790-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.278.9.790.
8
Quality assurance of clinical transfusion practice by implementation of the privilege of blood prescription and computerized prospective audit of blood requests.通过实施用血处方权限和对用血申请进行计算机化前瞻性审核来确保临床输血实践的质量保证。
Transfus Med. 1996 Mar;6(1):11-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3148.1996.d01-48.x.
9
Reducing risks in blood transfusion: process and outcome.降低输血风险:过程与结果
Transfus Med. 1996 Mar;6(1):1-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3148.1996.d01-47.x.
10
Technical issues: logistics. AAMC.
Acad Med. 1993 Jun;68(6):464-8; discussion 469-70. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199306000-00004.