Ormel Johan, Oldehinkel Albertine J, Vollebergh Wilma
Department of Psychiatry and Graduate School of Behavioral and Cognitive Neurosciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 Oct;61(10):990-6. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.10.990.
Vulnerability as defined by high levels of neuroticism, low self-esteem, and poor coping skills characterizes individuals with a history of major depressive episodes (MDEs).
To separate postmorbid vulnerability into (1) trait effects (ie, the continuation of premorbid vulnerability); (2) state effects of subthreshold (residual) symptoms on personality or its perception; and/or (3) scar effects (ie, negative personality change that develops during an MDE and persists beyond MDE remission).
Data come from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study, a prospective Dutch psychiatric population-based survey. We obtained psychiatric (Composite International Diagnostic Interview) and personality data on neuroticism, depressive coping style, self-esteem, and mastery from 4796 respondents at 3 time points (T1, T2, and T3), 12 and 24 months apart. Between- and within-subjects differences were tested with repeated-measures analysis of variance and adjusted for sex, age, and time.
After T1, 409 respondents developed an MDE, of whom 334 were MDE-free at T3. In comparison with individuals without any lifetime MDE, the 262 subjects with a first MDE had higher premorbid T1 vulnerability scores on each personality measure (0.38-0.83 effect size units). During the MDE, vulnerability scores further increased (0.33-0.52 effect size units) but returned to premorbid levels after MDE remission. We found no scar effects among subgroups with severe or long-lasting MDEs. Subthreshold residual symptoms at T3 biased comparisons between T1 and T3 if the premorbid period of T1 to MDE onset was longer than the postmorbid period of MDE remission to T3, misleadingly suggesting scar effects. We obtained similar results in the 147 subjects with recurrent MDEs.
There was no evidence of a negative change from premorbid to postmorbid assessment for any of the personality traits. Postmorbid vulnerability reflected the continuation of premorbid vulnerability. Pre-post MDE comparisons are sensitive to prodromal and residual symptoms. Our findings suggest 2 independent simultaneous processes: (1) the ongoing expression of vulnerability as a personality deviance; and (2) synchrony of change between severity of depressive symptoms and personality deviance.
神经质水平高、自尊低和应对技能差所定义的易感性是有重度抑郁发作(MDE)病史个体的特征。
将病后易感性分为:(1)特质效应(即病前易感性的延续);(2)阈下(残留)症状对人格或其认知的状态效应;和/或(3)瘢痕效应(即在MDE期间出现并在MDE缓解后持续存在的负面人格变化)。
数据来自荷兰心理健康调查与发病率研究,这是一项基于荷兰精神病学人群的前瞻性调查。我们在3个时间点(T1、T2和T3),间隔12个月和24个月,从4796名受访者那里获取了关于神经质、抑郁应对方式、自尊和掌控感的精神病学(复合国际诊断访谈)和人格数据。组间和组内差异采用重复测量方差分析进行检验,并对性别、年龄和时间进行了校正。
在T1之后,409名受访者出现了MDE,其中334人在T3时无MDE。与没有任何终生MDE的个体相比,262名首次发生MDE 的受试者在每项人格测量上的病前T1易感性得分更高(效应量单位为0.38 - 0.83)。在MDE期间,易感性得分进一步增加(效应量单位为0.33 - 0.52),但在MDE缓解后恢复到病前水平。我们在患有严重或长期MDE的亚组中未发现瘢痕效应。如果从T1到MDE发作的病前期长于从MDE缓解到T3的病后期,T3时的阈下残留症状会使T1和T3之间的比较产生偏差,错误地提示瘢痕效应。我们在147名复发性MDE患者中也得到了类似的结果。
没有证据表明任何人格特质从病前到病后评估有负面变化。病后易感性反映了病前易感性的延续。MDE前后的比较对前驱症状和残留症状敏感。我们的研究结果提示了2个独立的同时发生的过程:(1)作为人格偏差的易感性的持续表达;以及(2)抑郁症状严重程度与人格偏差之间变化的同步性。