Lerner Jeremy M, Zucker Robert M
LightForm, Inc., 601 Route 206, Suite 26-479, Hillsborough, NJ 08844, USA.
Cytometry A. 2004 Nov;62(1):8-34. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.20087.
Confocal spectral imaging (CSI) microscopic systems currently on the market delineate multiple fluorescent proteins, labels, or dyes within biological specimens by performing spectral characterizations. However, some CSI systems have been found to present inconsistent spectral profiles of reference spectra within a particular system and between related and unrelated instruments. This variability confirms that there is a need for a standardized, objective calibration and validation protocol.
Our protocol uses an inexpensive multi-ion discharge lamp (MIDL) that contains Hg(+), Ar(+), and inorganic fluorophores that emit distinct, stable, spectral features in place of a sample. We derived reference spectra from the MIDL data to accurately predict the spectral resolution, ratio of wavelength to wavelength, contrast, and aliasing parameters of any CSI system. We were also able to predict and confirm the influence of pinhole diameter on spectral profiles.
Using this simulation, we determined that there was good agreement between observed and theoretical expectations, thus enabling us to identify malfunctioning subsystems. We examined eight CSI systems and one nonconfocal spectral system, all of which displayed spectral inconsistencies. No instrument met its optimal performance expectations. In two systems, we established the need for factory realignment that had not been otherwise recognized.
We found that using a primary light source that emits an absolute standard "reference spectrum" enabled us to diagnose instrumental errors and measure accuracy and reproducibility under normalized conditions. With this information, a CSI operator can determine whether a CSI system is working optimally and make objective comparisons with the performance of other CSI systems. We determined that, if CSI systems were standardized to produce the same spectral profile of a MIDL lamp, researchers could be confident that the same experimental findings would be obtained on any CSI system.
目前市场上的共焦光谱成像(CSI)显微系统通过进行光谱表征来描绘生物样本中的多种荧光蛋白、标记物或染料。然而,已发现一些CSI系统在特定系统内以及相关和不相关仪器之间呈现出参考光谱不一致的情况。这种变异性证实了需要一种标准化、客观的校准和验证方案。
我们的方案使用一种廉价的多离子放电灯(MIDL),它包含Hg(+)、Ar(+)和无机荧光团,这些物质能发出独特、稳定的光谱特征,以此替代样本。我们从MIDL数据中得出参考光谱,以准确预测任何CSI系统的光谱分辨率、波长与波长之比、对比度和混叠参数。我们还能够预测并确认针孔直径对光谱轮廓的影响。
通过这种模拟,我们确定观察结果与理论预期之间具有良好的一致性,从而使我们能够识别出故障子系统。我们检查了八个CSI系统和一个非共焦光谱系统,所有这些系统都显示出光谱不一致的情况。没有一台仪器达到其最佳性能预期。在两个系统中,我们确定需要进行工厂重新校准,而这在其他情况下并未被识别出来。
我们发现使用能发射绝对标准“参考光谱”的主光源使我们能够诊断仪器误差,并在标准化条件下测量准确性和可重复性。有了这些信息,CSI操作人员可以确定CSI系统是否在最佳状态下运行,并与其他CSI系统的性能进行客观比较。我们确定,如果CSI系统被标准化以产生与MIDL灯相同的光谱轮廓,研究人员可以确信在任何CSI系统上都能获得相同的实验结果。