Suppr超能文献

支持/反对临床辩论:气管切开术是严重神经功能障碍患者撤机的理想选择。

Pro/con clinical debate: tracheostomy is ideal for withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in severe neurological impairment.

作者信息

Mascia Luciana, Corno Eleomore, Terragni Pier Paok, Stather David, Ferguson Niall D

出版信息

Crit Care. 2004 Oct;8(5):327-30. doi: 10.1186/cc2864. Epub 2004 May 13.

Abstract

Most clinical trials on the topic of extubation have involved patients outside the neurological intensive care unit. As a result, in this area clinicians are left with little evidence on which to base their decision making. Although tracheostomies are increasingly common procedures, they are not without complications and costs, and hence a decision to perform them should not be taken lightly. In this issue of Critical Care two groups debate the merits of tracheostomy before extubation in a patient with neurological impairment. What becomes very clear is the need for more high quality data for this common clinical problem.

摘要

大多数关于拔管主题的临床试验涉及神经重症监护病房以外的患者。因此,在这一领域,临床医生几乎没有证据来支持他们的决策。尽管气管切开术越来越常见,但并非没有并发症和成本,因此决定实施该手术不应掉以轻心。在本期《重症监护》中,两组人员就神经功能受损患者拔管前气管切开术的优点展开了辩论。非常明显的是,对于这个常见的临床问题,需要更多高质量的数据。

相似文献

9
Tracheal extubation.气管拔管
Respir Care. 2014 Jun;59(6):991-1002; discussion 1002-5. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02926.
10
Weaning from mechanical ventilation.机械通气的撤机
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug;35(4):451-68. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1381953. Epub 2014 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
6
Predictors of successful extubation in neurosurgical patients.神经外科患者成功拔管的预测因素。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Mar;163(3 Pt 1):658-64. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.3.2003060.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验