Butterworth Peter, Crosier Timothy
Centre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, ACT 0200 Australia.
BMC Public Health. 2004 Oct 7;4:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-4-44.
The SF-36 is one of the most widely used self-completion measures of health status. The inclusion of the SF-36 in the first Australian national household panel survey, the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey, provides an opportunity to investigate health inequalities. In this analysis we establish the psychometric properties and criterion validity of the SF-36 HILDA Survey data and examine scale profiles across a range of measures of socio-economic circumstance.
Data from 13,055 respondents who completed the first wave of the HILDA Survey were analysed to determine the psychometric properties of the SF-36 and the relationship of the SF-36 scales to other measures of health, disability, social functioning and demographic characteristics.
Results of principle components analysis were similar to previous Australian and international reports. Survey scales demonstrated convergent and divergent validity, and different markers of social status demonstrated unique patterns of outcomes across the scales.
Results demonstrated the validity of the SF-36 data collected during the first wave of the HILDA Survey and support its use in research examining health inequalities and population health characteristics in Australia.
SF-36是最广泛使用的自我完成式健康状况测量工具之一。在澳大利亚首次全国性家庭面板调查“澳大利亚家庭、收入与劳动力动态调查”(HILDA调查)中纳入SF-36,为调查健康不平等现象提供了契机。在本分析中,我们确定了HILDA调查中SF-36数据的心理测量特性和标准效度,并考察了一系列社会经济状况测量指标下的量表概况。
对13055名完成HILDA调查首轮调查的受访者的数据进行分析,以确定SF-36的心理测量特性,以及SF-36量表与其他健康、残疾、社会功能和人口统计学特征测量指标之间的关系。
主成分分析结果与之前澳大利亚和国际报告相似。调查量表显示出收敛效度和区分效度,不同社会地位指标在各量表上呈现出独特的结果模式。
结果证明了HILDA调查首轮调查期间收集的SF-36数据的有效性,并支持其在研究澳大利亚健康不平等和人口健康特征方面的应用。