Wordsworth Sarah, Skåtun Diane, Scott Anthony, French Fiona
Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK.
Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Oct;54(507):740-6.
Many countries are experiencing recruitment and retention problems in general practice, particularly in rural areas. In the United Kingdom (UK), recent contractual changes aim to address general practitioner (GP) recruitment and retention difficulties. However, the evidence base for their impact is limited, and preference differences between principals and sessional GPs (previously called non-principals) are insufficiently explored.
To elicit GP principals' and sessional GPs' preferences for alternative jobs in general practice, and to identify the most important work attributes.
A discrete choice experiment.
National Health Service (NHS) general practices throughout Scotland.
A postal questionnaire was sent to 1862 principals and 712 sessional GPs. The questionnaire contained a discrete choice experiment to quantify GPs' preferences for different job attributes.
A response rate of 49% (904/1862) was achieved for principals and 54% (388/712) for sessional GPs. Of responders, most principals were male (60%), and sessional GPs female (75%), with the average age being 42 years. All GPs preferred a job with longer consultations, no increase in working hours, but an increase in earnings. A job with outside commitments (for example, a health board or hospital) was preferable; one with additional out-of-hours work was less preferable. Sessional GPs placed a lower value on consultation length, were less worried about hours of work, and a job offering sufficient continuing professional development was less important.
The differences in preferences between principals and sessional GPs, and also between different personal characteristics, suggests that a general contract could fail to cater for all GPs. Recruitment and retention of GPs may improve if the least preferred aspects of their jobs are changed. However, the long-term success of contractual reform will require enhancement of the positive aspects of working, such as patient contact.
许多国家在全科医疗领域都面临招聘和留用问题,尤其是在农村地区。在英国,近期的合同变更旨在解决全科医生(GP)的招聘和留用难题。然而,其影响的证据基础有限,且对诊所负责人和兼职全科医生(以前称为非负责人)之间的偏好差异探讨不足。
了解诊所负责人和兼职全科医生对全科医疗领域其他工作的偏好,并确定最重要的工作属性。
离散选择实验。
苏格兰各地的国民保健服务(NHS)全科诊所。
向1862名诊所负责人和712名兼职全科医生发送了邮政问卷。问卷包含一个离散选择实验,以量化全科医生对不同工作属性的偏好。
诊所负责人的回复率为49%(904/1862),兼职全科医生的回复率为54%(388/712)。在回复者中,大多数诊所负责人为男性(60%),兼职全科医生为女性(75%),平均年龄为42岁。所有全科医生都更喜欢会诊时间更长、工作时间不增加但收入增加的工作。有外部工作任务(例如健康委员会或医院)的工作更受欢迎;有额外非工作时间工作的工作则不太受欢迎。兼职全科医生对会诊时长的重视程度较低,对工作时长不太担心,提供充足继续职业发展机会的工作对他们来说不太重要。
诊所负责人和兼职全科医生之间以及不同个人特征之间的偏好差异表明,通用合同可能无法满足所有全科医生的需求。如果改变他们工作中最不喜欢的方面,全科医生的招聘和留用情况可能会改善。然而,合同改革的长期成功将需要加强工作的积极方面,如与患者的接触。