• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在全科医疗中实施高血压治疗新指南的成本效益

Cost-effectiveness of implementing new guidelines for treatment of hypertension in general practice.

作者信息

Richardson Gerald, Godfrey Lesley, Gravelle Hugh, Watt Ian

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Oct;54(507):765-71.

PMID:15469676
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1324882/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is a major public health concern and, as the population ages, the size of the problem is likely to increase. However, detection rates and treatment of hypertension have been low. The introduction of new guidelines for the detection and treatment of hypertension have been encouraged but without any consideration to their cost-effectiveness.

AIM

To assess the potential cost-effectiveness of implementing new guidelines for the treatment of hypertension in general practice.

DESIGN OF STUDY

Model examining the incremental costs and effects of the new guidelines compared with the old.

SETTING

A large general practice in north Yorkshire.

METHOD

Two thousand and twenty-three patients reporting for a new health patient check had the costs and outcomes under the old and new guidelines estimated.

RESULTS

Implementing new guidelines for the detection, management, and treatment of hypertension in a primary care setting is more costly than the implementation of previous guidelines, but more effective in reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease. The incremental cost per cardiovascular disease event avoided is ?30 000, although sensitivity analysis shows that the estimate is subject to considerable uncertainty.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with previous guidelines, introducing new guidelines for the management and treatment of hypertension in new patients in general practice is likely to be cost-effective. However, the workforce implications for general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses should be considered.

摘要

背景

高血压是一个重大的公共卫生问题,并且随着人口老龄化,该问题的规模可能会扩大。然而,高血压的检出率和治疗率一直很低。人们鼓励引入高血压检测和治疗的新指南,但未考虑其成本效益。

目的

评估在全科医疗中实施高血压治疗新指南的潜在成本效益。

研究设计

比较新指南与旧指南的增量成本和效果的模型。

研究地点

北约克郡的一家大型全科诊所。

方法

对2023名前来进行新的健康检查的患者,估算新旧指南下的成本和结果。

结果

在基层医疗环境中实施高血压检测、管理和治疗的新指南比实施先前的指南成本更高,但在降低心血管疾病风险方面更有效。避免每例心血管疾病事件的增量成本为30000英镑,尽管敏感性分析表明该估计存在相当大的不确定性。

结论

与先前的指南相比,在全科医疗中为新患者引入高血压管理和治疗的新指南可能具有成本效益。然而,应考虑对全科医生(GP)和执业护士的劳动力影响。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of implementing new guidelines for treatment of hypertension in general practice.在全科医疗中实施高血压治疗新指南的成本效益
Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Oct;54(507):765-71.
2
Cost-effectiveness of hypertension therapy according to 2014 guidelines.根据2014年指南的高血压治疗成本效益
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 29;372(5):447-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1406751.
3
Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Conservative or Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment Guidelines in Adults Aged 35-74 Years: The Cardiovascular Disease Policy Model.35至74岁成年人中保守或强化血压治疗指南的比较成本效益:心血管疾病政策模型
Hypertension. 2016 Jul;68(1):88-96. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06814. Epub 2016 May 15.
4
Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Hypertension Treatment in Non-Hispanic Blacks and Whites According to 2014 Guidelines: A Modeling Study.根据2014年指南对非西班牙裔黑人和白人高血压治疗的成本效益比较:一项建模研究
Am J Hypertens. 2016 Oct;29(10):1195-205. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpw047. Epub 2016 May 12.
5
Improving cost-effectiveness of hypertension management at a community health centre.提高社区卫生中心高血压管理的成本效益。
S Afr Med J. 1998 May;88(5):549-54.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of guidelines for antihypertensive care in Finland.芬兰高血压护理指南的成本效益分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct 24;7:172. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-172.
7
[New treatment strategies for the management of hypertension].[高血压管理的新治疗策略]
MMW Fortschr Med. 2009 Nov 12;151(46):33-6.
8
Cost-Effectiveness of Drug Treatment for Chinese Patients With Stage I Hypertension According to the 2017 Hypertension Clinical Practice Guidelines.根据 2017 年高血压临床实践指南,中国 I 期高血压患者药物治疗的成本效益。
Hypertension. 2020 Sep;76(3):750-758. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14533. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
9
The cost-effectiveness of implementing a new guideline for cardiovascular risk management in primary care in the Netherlands.在荷兰初级医疗保健中实施心血管风险管理新指南的成本效益。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009 Jun;16(3):371-6. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328329497a.
10
Identification of factors driving differences in cost effectiveness of first-line pharmacological therapy for uncomplicated hypertension.识别驱动一线降压药物治疗单纯性高血压成本效益差异的因素。
Can J Cardiol. 2010 May;26(5):e158-63. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(10)70383-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary care research on hypertension: A bibliometric analysis using machine-learning.高血压的初级保健研究:一项使用机器学习的文献计量分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Nov 22;103(47):e40482. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040482.
2
Direct costs of adhering to selected Duchenne muscular dystrophy Care Considerations: Estimates from a midwestern state.坚持选择的杜氏肌营养不良护理注意事项的直接成本:中西部一州的估计值。
Muscle Nerve. 2022 May;65(5):574-580. doi: 10.1002/mus.27505. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
3
Physicians' perceptions and adherence to guidelines for the management of hypertension: a national, multicentre, prospective study.医生对高血压管理指南的认知与遵循情况:一项全国性、多中心、前瞻性研究。
Int J Hypertens. 2012;2012:503821. doi: 10.1155/2012/503821. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
4
2006 Ontario Survey on the Prevalence and Control of Hypertension (ON-BP): rationale and design of a community-based cross-sectional survey.2006年安大略省高血压患病率与控制情况调查(ON-BP):一项基于社区的横断面调查的基本原理与设计
Can J Cardiol. 2008 Jun;24(6):503-5. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(08)70626-3.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of guidelines for antihypertensive care in Finland.芬兰高血压护理指南的成本效益分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct 24;7:172. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-172.

本文引用的文献

1
Control of blood pressure in the community: an unsolved problem.社区中的血压控制:一个未解决的问题。
Curr Pharm Des. 2003;9(29):2375-84. doi: 10.2174/1381612033453848.
2
Discounting for health effects in cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis.成本效益分析和成本效果分析中健康效应的贴现
Health Econ. 2001 Oct;10(7):587-99. doi: 10.1002/hec.618.
3
Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease.用于冠心病一级预防的多重危险因素干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD001561. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001561.
4
Pharmacotherapy for hypertension in the elderly.老年人高血压的药物治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000028. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000028.
5
British Hypertension Society guidelines for hypertension management 1999: summary.英国高血压学会1999年高血压管理指南:摘要
BMJ. 1999 Sep 4;319(7210):630-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7210.630.
6
Blood pressure screening, management and control in England: results from the health survey for England 1994.英格兰的血压筛查、管理与控制:1994年英格兰健康调查结果
J Hypertens. 1998 Jun;16(6):747-52. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199816060-00005.
7
Hypertension in the elderly. Implications and generalizability of randomized trials.老年人高血压。随机试验的意义及普遍性
JAMA. 1994 Dec 28;272(24):1932-8.
8
General practitioners' knowledge of and attitudes to the management of hypertension in elderly patients.全科医生对老年患者高血压管理的知识与态度。
Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Oct;44(387):446-9.
9
Drug treatment of hypertension in the elderly: a meta-analysis.老年人高血压的药物治疗:一项荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 1994 Sep 1;121(5):355-62. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-121-5-199409010-00008.
10
Does antihypertensive treatment of the elderly prevent cardiovascular events or prolong life? A meta-analysis of hypertension treatment trials.老年高血压治疗能否预防心血管事件或延长寿命?高血压治疗试验的荟萃分析。
Arch Fam Med. 1995 Nov;4(11):943-9; discussion 950. doi: 10.1001/archfami.4.11.943.