• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据 2017 年高血压临床实践指南,中国 I 期高血压患者药物治疗的成本效益。

Cost-Effectiveness of Drug Treatment for Chinese Patients With Stage I Hypertension According to the 2017 Hypertension Clinical Practice Guidelines.

机构信息

From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Y.-F.Z., N.L., X.-Y.S., X.-F.P., A.P.), School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Department of Health Economics, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (P.W.).

出版信息

Hypertension. 2020 Sep;76(3):750-758. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14533. Epub 2020 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14533
PMID:32713271
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7429361/
Abstract

Systolic/diastolic blood pressure of 130 to 139/80 to 89 mm Hg has been defined as stage I hypertension by the 2017 Hypertension Clinical Practice Guidelines. Drug treatment is recommended for stage I hypertensive patients aged ≥65 years without cardiovascular disease in the 2017 Hypertension Clinical Practice Guidelines but not in the 2018 Chinese guidelines. However, the cost-effectiveness of drug treatment among this subgroup of Chinese patients is unclear. This study developed a microsimulation model to compare costs and effectiveness of drug treatment and nondrug treatment for the subgroup of stage I hypertensive patients over a lifetime horizon from a government affordability perspective. Event rates of mortality and cardiovascular complications were estimated from 3 cohorts in the Chinese population. Costs and health utilities were obtained from the national statistics report and published literature. The model predicted that drug treatment generated quality-adjusted life-years of 13.52 and associated with expected costs of $6825 in comparison with 13.81 and $7328 produced by nondrug treatment over a lifetime horizon among stage I hypertensive patients aged ≥65 years without cardiovascular disease. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $8836/quality-adjusted life-year (the GDP per capita in 2017), drug treatment only had a 1.8% probability of being cost-effective compared with nondrug treatment after 10 000 probabilistic simulations. Sensitivity analysis of treatment costs, benefits expected from treatment, health utilities, and discount rates did not change the results. Our results suggested that drug treatment was not cost-effective compared with nondrug treatment for stage I hypertensive patients aged ≥65 years without cardiovascular disease in China.

摘要

收缩压/舒张压为 130 至 139/80 至 89mmHg 已被 2017 年高血压临床实践指南定义为 1 期高血压。2017 年高血压临床实践指南建议对年龄≥65 岁且无心血管疾病的 1 期高血压患者进行药物治疗,但 2018 年中国指南则不建议这样做。然而,对于中国患者的这一亚组人群,药物治疗的成本效益尚不清楚。本研究从政府支付能力的角度出发,开发了一个微观模拟模型,比较了药物治疗和非药物治疗在终生范围内对无心血管疾病的≥65 岁 1 期高血压患者亚组的成本效益。死亡率和心血管并发症的事件发生率是根据中国人群中的 3 个队列估计的。成本和健康效用是从国家统计报告和已发表的文献中获得的。模型预测,与非药物治疗相比,药物治疗在 1 期高血压患者中(无心血管疾病)≥65 岁的患者亚组中,在终生范围内产生的质量调整生命年为 13.52 年,预计成本为 6825 美元,而产生的质量调整生命年为 13.81 年,预计成本为 7328 美元。在 8836 美元/质量调整生命年(2017 年人均 GDP)的意愿支付阈值下,在 10000 次概率模拟后,药物治疗仅比非药物治疗具有 1.8%的成本效益可能性。治疗成本、治疗预期收益、健康效用和贴现率的敏感性分析并未改变结果。研究结果表明,在中国,与非药物治疗相比,药物治疗对无心血管疾病的≥65 岁 1 期高血压患者并不具有成本效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ce/7429361/d63309402db1/nihms-1605301-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ce/7429361/a0fb8fcc4b28/nihms-1605301-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ce/7429361/d63309402db1/nihms-1605301-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ce/7429361/a0fb8fcc4b28/nihms-1605301-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ce/7429361/d63309402db1/nihms-1605301-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Drug Treatment for Chinese Patients With Stage I Hypertension According to the 2017 Hypertension Clinical Practice Guidelines.根据 2017 年高血压临床实践指南,中国 I 期高血压患者药物治疗的成本效益。
Hypertension. 2020 Sep;76(3):750-758. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14533. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
2
Cost-effectiveness of drug treatment for young and middle-aged stage 1 hypertensive patients with high risk.药物治疗高危中青年 1 期高血压患者的成本效益分析。
J Glob Health. 2023 Nov 24;13:04147. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04147.
3
Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Conservative or Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment Guidelines in Adults Aged 35-74 Years: The Cardiovascular Disease Policy Model.35至74岁成年人中保守或强化血压治疗指南的比较成本效益:心血管疾病政策模型
Hypertension. 2016 Jul;68(1):88-96. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06814. Epub 2016 May 15.
4
The Cost-Effectiveness of Low-Cost Essential Antihypertensive Medicines for Hypertension Control in China: A Modelling Study.中国低成本基本降压药物控制高血压的成本效益:一项建模研究
PLoS Med. 2015 Aug 4;12(8):e1001860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001860. eCollection 2015 Aug.
5
Applicability and cost-effectiveness of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) in the Chinese population: A cost-effectiveness modeling study.在中国人群中开展收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)的适用性和成本效益:一项成本效益建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2021 Mar 4;18(3):e1003515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003515. eCollection 2021 Mar.
6
Cost-effectiveness of self-management of blood pressure in hypertensive patients over 70 years with suboptimal control and established cardiovascular disease or additional cardiovascular risk diseases (TASMIN-SR).高血压患者自我血压管理的成本效益:血压控制不理想且患有心血管疾病或其他心血管风险疾病的 70 岁以上患者(TASMIN-SR)。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Jun;23(9):902-12. doi: 10.1177/2047487315618784. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
7
Cost-effectiveness of hypertension therapy according to 2014 guidelines.根据2014年指南的高血压治疗成本效益
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 29;372(5):447-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1406751.
8
Cost-Effectiveness of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.强化血压控制与标准血压控制的成本效益
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 24;377(8):745-755. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1616035.
9
Telemonitoring and self-management in the control of hypertension (TASMINH2): a cost-effectiveness analysis.高血压控制中的远程监测与自我管理(TASMINH2):一项成本效益分析。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Dec;21(12):1517-30. doi: 10.1177/2047487313501886. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
10
Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Hypertension Treatment in Non-Hispanic Blacks and Whites According to 2014 Guidelines: A Modeling Study.根据2014年指南对非西班牙裔黑人和白人高血压治疗的成本效益比较:一项建模研究
Am J Hypertens. 2016 Oct;29(10):1195-205. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpw047. Epub 2016 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of different exercise modalities on blood pressure and endothelial function in prehypertension individuals: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.不同运动方式对高血压前期个体血压及内皮功能的影响:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jun 25;12:1550435. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1550435. eCollection 2025.
2
Cost-effectiveness of cardiovascular risk assessment and management among adults with hypertension in China: A modelling study.中国高血压成年患者心血管风险评估与管理的成本效益:一项建模研究。
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2025 May 13;22:101007. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101007. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Introduction to the Special Issue on "The World Health Organization Choosing Interventions That Are Cost-Effective (WHO-CHOICE) Update".关于“世界卫生组织选择具有成本效益的干预措施(WHO-CHOICE)更新”特刊的介绍。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Nov 1;10(11):670-672. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.105.
2
Associations of blood pressure categories defined by 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines with mortality in China: Pooled results from three prospective cohorts.2017ACC/AHA 指南定义的血压类别与中国人群死亡率的相关性:三项前瞻性队列研究的汇总结果。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Mar;27(4):345-354. doi: 10.1177/2047487319862066. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a nonphysician-led, community-based blood pressure intervention in rural China based on CRHCP research.
基于中国农村社区高血压控制项目(CRHCP)研究的非医师主导的农村社区血压干预措施的成本效益分析
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Dec 9;40(1):e73. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000461.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Salt Substitution and Antihypertensive Drug Treatment in Chinese Prehypertensive Adults.中国高血压前期成年人用盐替代和抗高血压药物治疗的成本效果分析。
Hypertension. 2024 Dec;81(12):2529-2539. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23412. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of a Workplace-Based Hypertension Management Program in Real-World Practice in the Kailuan Study.基于现实实践的凯伦研究中基于工作场所的高血压管理计划的成本效益。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Apr 16;13(8):e031578. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031578. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
6
Effect of Tai Chi vs Aerobic Exercise on Blood Pressure in Patients With Prehypertension: A Randomized Clinical Trial.太极拳与有氧运动对高血压前期患者血压的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e2354937. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.54937.
7
Cost-effectiveness of treatment in adults with blood pressure of 130-139/80-89 mmHg and high cardiovascular risk in China: a modelling study.中国130-139/80-89 mmHg血压且心血管风险高的成年人治疗的成本效益:一项建模研究
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Nov 17;42:100962. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100962. eCollection 2024 Jan.
8
Cost-effectiveness of drug treatment for young and middle-aged stage 1 hypertensive patients with high risk.药物治疗高危中青年 1 期高血压患者的成本效益分析。
J Glob Health. 2023 Nov 24;13:04147. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04147.
9
Cost-effectiveness and potential budget impact of non-pharmacological interventions for early management in prehypertensive people: an economic evaluation for China.非药物干预措施在高血压前期人群早期管理中的成本效益及潜在预算影响:中国的经济评估。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 11;23(1):1531. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16458-1.
10
Short-term efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for global population with elevated blood pressure: A network meta-analysis.非药物干预对全球高血压人群的短期疗效:一项网络荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 13;10:1051581. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1051581. eCollection 2022.
Clinical outcomes and economic impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines on hypertension in China.
中国 2017 年 ACC/AHA 高血压指南的临床结局和经济影响。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Aug;21(8):1212-1220. doi: 10.1111/jch.13609. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
4
Association Between Medication Adherence and 1-Year Major Cardiovascular Adverse Events After Acute Myocardial Infarction in China.中国急性心肌梗死后药物治疗依从性与 1 年主要心血管不良事件的关系。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 May 7;8(9):e011793. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011793.
5
Prevalence of Hypertension, Treatment, and Blood Pressure Targets in Canada Associated With the 2017 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guidelines.加拿大高血压的患病率、治疗方法以及与 2017 年美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会血压指南相关的血压目标。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190406. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0406.
6
Estimated Change in Prevalence of Hypertension in Nepal Following Application of the 2017 ACC/AHA Guideline.2017ACC/AHA 指南应用后尼泊尔高血压患病率的估计变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jul 6;1(3):e180606. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0606.
7
New 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association High Blood Pressure Guideline.2017 年新美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会高血压指南。
Hypertension. 2019 Jan;73(1):142-147. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11827.
8
Association of hypertension cut-off values with 10-year cardiovascular mortality and clinical consequences: a real-world perspective from the prospective MONICA/KORA study.高血压截断值与 10 年心血管死亡率及临床后果的关系:来自前瞻性 MONICA/KORA 研究的真实世界观察。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Mar 1;40(9):732-738. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy694.
9
Association of Blood Pressure Classification in Korean Young Adults According to the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines With Subsequent Cardiovascular Disease Events.根据 2017 年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南对韩国年轻成年人进行的血压分类与随后心血管疾病事件的关系。
JAMA. 2018 Nov 6;320(17):1783-1792. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.16501.
10
Association of Blood Pressure Classification in Young Adults Using the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guideline With Cardiovascular Events Later in Life.2017 年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会血压指南中青年人群血压分类与日后心血管事件的关联。
JAMA. 2018 Nov 6;320(17):1774-1782. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13551.