• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丙泊酚和硫喷妥钠的诱导剂量反应研究。

Induction dose-responses studies with propofol and thiopentone.

作者信息

Naguib M, Sari-Kouzel A, Seraj M, el-Gammal M, Gomma M

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 1992 Mar;68(3):308-10. doi: 10.1093/bja/68.3.308.

DOI:10.1093/bja/68.3.308
PMID:1547057
Abstract

The relative potencies of propofol and thiopentone were assessed using different indicators of induction of anaesthesia: abolition of the response to verbal commands and eyelash stimulation. Log-probit dose-response curves for these end-points were determined 30, 60 and 90 s after induction in 96 unpremedicated ASA group I patients. For propofol, ED50 values for abolition of the response to verbal commands and eyelash stimulation at different time intervals were in the ranges 1.16-1.42 and 1.23-1.72 mg kg-1, respectively; corresponding ED95 values were 2.18-2.67 and 2.42-3.27 mg kg-1, respectively. For thiopentone, the calculated ED50 values for verbal commands and eyelash stimulation at the same time intervals were 1.81-2.23 and 3.55-3.40 mg kg-1; corresponding ED95 values were 5.11-6.29 and 6.41-6.70 mg kg-1, respectively. The potency ratio of propofol to thiopentone observed in this study varied from 1:1.27 to 1:2.88. It is concluded that a dose-response curve reflecting one end-point of anaesthesia cannot be used to define another end-point of anaesthesia.

摘要

使用不同的麻醉诱导指标(对言语指令和睫毛刺激反应的消失)评估丙泊酚和硫喷妥钠的相对效价。在96例未使用术前药的ASA I级患者诱导后30、60和90秒测定这些终点的对数概率剂量-反应曲线。对于丙泊酚,不同时间间隔下对言语指令反应消失和睫毛刺激反应消失的ED50值分别在1.16 - 1.42和1.23 - 1.72mg·kg-1范围内;相应的ED95值分别为2.18 - 2.67和2.42 - 3.27mg·kg-1。对于硫喷妥钠,相同时间间隔下对言语指令和睫毛刺激反应的计算ED50值分别为1.81 - 2.23和3.55 - 3.40mg·kg-1;相应的ED95值分别为5.11 - 6.29和6.41 - 6.70mg·kg-1。本研究中观察到的丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠的效价比在1:1.27至1:2.88之间。得出的结论是,反映麻醉一个终点的剂量-反应曲线不能用于定义麻醉的另一个终点。

相似文献

1
Induction dose-responses studies with propofol and thiopentone.丙泊酚和硫喷妥钠的诱导剂量反应研究。
Br J Anaesth. 1992 Mar;68(3):308-10. doi: 10.1093/bja/68.3.308.
2
Thiopentone-propofol hypnotic synergism in patients.硫喷妥钠-丙泊酚对患者的催眠协同作用
Br J Anaesth. 1991 Jul;67(1):4-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/67.1.4.
3
The effects of melatonin premedication on propofol and thiopental induction dose-response curves: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
Anesth Analg. 2006 Dec;103(6):1448-52. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000244534.24216.3a.
4
Induction dose-response curves for midazolam and ketamine in premedicated ASA class III and IV patients.咪达唑仑和氯胺酮在术前用药的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)Ⅲ级和Ⅳ级患者中的诱导剂量-反应曲线。
Anesth Analg. 1985 Aug;64(8):795-800.
5
Induction dose-response of propofol in unpremedicated children.未用术前药儿童丙泊酚的诱导剂量反应
Br J Anaesth. 1992 Jan;68(1):64-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/68.1.64.
6
Synergistic interaction between midazolam and propofol.
Br J Anaesth. 1992 Sep;69(3):240-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/69.3.240.
7
Comparative evaluation of propofol and thiopentone for total intravenous anaesthesia.丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠用于全静脉麻醉的比较评价
Can J Anaesth. 1990 Mar;37(2):170-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03005465.
8
Atropine-induced heart rate changes: a comparison between midazolam-fentanyl-propofol-N2O and midazolam-fentanyl-thiopentone-enflurane-N2O anaesthesia.
Can J Anaesth. 1990 May;37(4 Pt 1):416-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03005617.
9
Anaesthesia for cardioversion: a comparison of propofol and thiopentone.心脏复律的麻醉:丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠的比较
Can J Anaesth. 1988 Sep;35(5):479-83. doi: 10.1007/BF03026895.
10
[Depth of anaesthesia during intubation: comparison between propofol and thiopentone].
Anaesthesist. 2006 Apr;55(4):401-6. doi: 10.1007/s00101-005-0956-5.

引用本文的文献

1
The potency-ratio of ciprofol and propofol under procedural sedation and anesthesia for outpatient hysteroscopy during cervical dilation: a study using up-and-down sequential allocation method.在宫颈扩张期间行门诊宫腔镜检查时,使用序贯上下法评估丙泊酚与西米普罗的麻醉效能比。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Nov 26;24(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02793-2.
2
Exploring the Median Effective Dose of Ciprofol for Anesthesia Induction in Elderly Patients: Impact of Frailty on ED.探讨老年患者中 Ciprofol 用于麻醉诱导的半数有效剂量:衰弱对 ED 的影响。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024 Apr 3;18:1025-1034. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S453486. eCollection 2024.
3
Remimazolam: another option for induction of general anesthesia?
瑞米唑仑:全身麻醉诱导的另一种选择?
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2022 Dec;75(6):457-459. doi: 10.4097/kja.22692. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
4
Comparison between hemodynamic effects of propofol and thiopental during general anesthesia induction with remifentanil infusion: a double-blind, age-stratified, randomized study.瑞芬太尼输注全麻诱导期丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠对血流动力学影响的比较:一项双盲、年龄分层、随机研究。
J Anesth. 2019 Aug;33(4):509-515. doi: 10.1007/s00540-019-02657-x. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
5
Comparison of trapezius squeeze test and jaw thrust as clinical indicators for laryngeal mask airway insertion in spontaneously breathing children.在自主呼吸儿童中,将斜方肌挤压试验与托下颌法作为喉罩置入临床指标的比较。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jan-Mar;33(1):71-75. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.202204.
6
A Phase 1c Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of a New Aqueous Formulation of Alphaxalone with Propofol.一项比较新型阿法沙龙水性制剂与丙泊酚疗效和安全性的1c期试验。
Anesth Analg. 2015 Oct;121(4):914-924. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000856.
7
Comparison of the trapezius squeezing test and jaw thrust as indicators for laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults.比较斜方肌挤压试验和下颌推顶试验作为成人喉罩气道置入的指标。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011 Sep;61(3):201-4. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2011.61.3.201. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
8
Propofol. An update of its use in anaesthesia and conscious sedation.丙泊酚。其在麻醉和清醒镇静中应用的最新情况。
Drugs. 1995 Sep;50(3):513-59. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199550030-00008.
9
A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for quantal responses with thiopental.一种用于硫喷妥钠定量反应的药代动力学-药效学模型。
J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1993 Jun;21(3):309-21. doi: 10.1007/BF01059782.