Gross J B, Caldwell C B, Edwards M W
Anesth Analg. 1985 Aug;64(8):795-800.
Using probit analysis, dose-response curves for induction of anesthesia with midazolam or ketamine were constructed in ASA class III and IV patients premedicated with morphine, 0.1 mg/kg, and glycopyrrolate, 4 micrograms/kg. For ketamine, ED50 values for abolition of the response to verbal commands, eyelash stimulation, and painful stimulation were 0.9, 1.3, and 1.3 mg/kg, respectively; corresponding ED95 values were 1.6, 2.3, and 4.3 mg/kg, which are within the range of clinically recommended doses. For midazolam, ED50 values for verbal commands, eyelash stimulation, and painful stimulation were 0.19, 0.24, and 0.36 mg/kg, significantly greater than those previously reported for unpremedicated ASA class I and II patients. The corresponding ED95 values, 0.35, 0.43, and 1.04 mg/kg exceed previously reported values and are appreciably greater than the doses used in most previous studies of midazolam induction. Midazolam decreased systolic blood pressure slightly but significantly (from 138 +/- 4 to 128 +/- 4 mm Hg, mean +/- SEM, P less than 0.005), while diastolic blood pressure and heart rate remained unchanged. In contrast, ketamine increased systolic blood pressure (from 141 +/- 4 to 164 +/- 5 mm Hg, P less than 0.005), diastolic blood pressure (from 71 +/- 3 to 88 +/- 4 mm Hg, P less than 0.005), and heart rate (from 84 +/- 2 to 102 +/- 4 beats/min, P less than 0.005). On the basis of these data, we conclude that in ASA class III and IV patients, midazolam induction allows for hemodynamic stability and avoids the significant tachycardia and hypertension associated with equipotent doses of ketamine.
采用概率单位分析,在预先使用0.1mg/kg吗啡和4μg/kg格隆溴铵进行术前用药的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)Ⅲ级和Ⅳ级患者中,构建了咪达唑仑或氯胺酮诱导麻醉的剂量-反应曲线。对于氯胺酮,消除对言语指令、睫毛刺激和疼痛刺激反应的半数有效剂量(ED50)值分别为0.9、1.3和1.3mg/kg;相应的95%有效剂量(ED95)值为1.6、2.3和4.3mg/kg,均在临床推荐剂量范围内。对于咪达唑仑,言语指令、睫毛刺激和疼痛刺激的ED50值分别为0.19、0.24和0.36mg/kg,显著高于先前报道的未进行术前用药的ASAⅠ级和Ⅱ级患者的值。相应的ED95值,即0.35、0.43和1.04mg/kg,超过了先前报道的值,且明显高于大多数先前咪达唑仑诱导研究中使用的剂量。咪达唑仑使收缩压略有但显著下降(从138±4降至128±4mmHg,均值±标准误,P<0.005),而舒张压和心率保持不变。相比之下,氯胺酮使收缩压升高(从141±4升至164±5mmHg,P<0.005),舒张压升高(从71±3升至88±4mmHg,P<0.005),心率升高(从84±2升至102±4次/分钟,P<0.005)。基于这些数据,我们得出结论,在ASAⅢ级和Ⅳ级患者中,咪达唑仑诱导可实现血流动力学稳定,并避免与等效剂量氯胺酮相关的显著心动过速和高血压。