• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

咪达唑仑和氯胺酮在术前用药的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)Ⅲ级和Ⅳ级患者中的诱导剂量-反应曲线。

Induction dose-response curves for midazolam and ketamine in premedicated ASA class III and IV patients.

作者信息

Gross J B, Caldwell C B, Edwards M W

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 1985 Aug;64(8):795-800.

PMID:3160264
Abstract

Using probit analysis, dose-response curves for induction of anesthesia with midazolam or ketamine were constructed in ASA class III and IV patients premedicated with morphine, 0.1 mg/kg, and glycopyrrolate, 4 micrograms/kg. For ketamine, ED50 values for abolition of the response to verbal commands, eyelash stimulation, and painful stimulation were 0.9, 1.3, and 1.3 mg/kg, respectively; corresponding ED95 values were 1.6, 2.3, and 4.3 mg/kg, which are within the range of clinically recommended doses. For midazolam, ED50 values for verbal commands, eyelash stimulation, and painful stimulation were 0.19, 0.24, and 0.36 mg/kg, significantly greater than those previously reported for unpremedicated ASA class I and II patients. The corresponding ED95 values, 0.35, 0.43, and 1.04 mg/kg exceed previously reported values and are appreciably greater than the doses used in most previous studies of midazolam induction. Midazolam decreased systolic blood pressure slightly but significantly (from 138 +/- 4 to 128 +/- 4 mm Hg, mean +/- SEM, P less than 0.005), while diastolic blood pressure and heart rate remained unchanged. In contrast, ketamine increased systolic blood pressure (from 141 +/- 4 to 164 +/- 5 mm Hg, P less than 0.005), diastolic blood pressure (from 71 +/- 3 to 88 +/- 4 mm Hg, P less than 0.005), and heart rate (from 84 +/- 2 to 102 +/- 4 beats/min, P less than 0.005). On the basis of these data, we conclude that in ASA class III and IV patients, midazolam induction allows for hemodynamic stability and avoids the significant tachycardia and hypertension associated with equipotent doses of ketamine.

摘要

采用概率单位分析,在预先使用0.1mg/kg吗啡和4μg/kg格隆溴铵进行术前用药的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)Ⅲ级和Ⅳ级患者中,构建了咪达唑仑或氯胺酮诱导麻醉的剂量-反应曲线。对于氯胺酮,消除对言语指令、睫毛刺激和疼痛刺激反应的半数有效剂量(ED50)值分别为0.9、1.3和1.3mg/kg;相应的95%有效剂量(ED95)值为1.6、2.3和4.3mg/kg,均在临床推荐剂量范围内。对于咪达唑仑,言语指令、睫毛刺激和疼痛刺激的ED50值分别为0.19、0.24和0.36mg/kg,显著高于先前报道的未进行术前用药的ASAⅠ级和Ⅱ级患者的值。相应的ED95值,即0.35、0.43和1.04mg/kg,超过了先前报道的值,且明显高于大多数先前咪达唑仑诱导研究中使用的剂量。咪达唑仑使收缩压略有但显著下降(从138±4降至128±4mmHg,均值±标准误,P<0.005),而舒张压和心率保持不变。相比之下,氯胺酮使收缩压升高(从141±4升至164±5mmHg,P<0.005),舒张压升高(从71±3升至88±4mmHg,P<0.005),心率升高(从84±2升至102±4次/分钟,P<0.005)。基于这些数据,我们得出结论,在ASAⅢ级和Ⅳ级患者中,咪达唑仑诱导可实现血流动力学稳定,并避免与等效剂量氯胺酮相关的显著心动过速和高血压。

相似文献

1
Induction dose-response curves for midazolam and ketamine in premedicated ASA class III and IV patients.咪达唑仑和氯胺酮在术前用药的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)Ⅲ级和Ⅳ级患者中的诱导剂量-反应曲线。
Anesth Analg. 1985 Aug;64(8):795-800.
2
Efficacy of ketamine and midazolam as co-induction agents with propofol for laryngeal mask insertion in children.氯胺酮与咪达唑仑作为丙泊酚的联合诱导剂用于儿童喉罩置入的疗效。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Jul;18(7):628-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02563.x. Epub 2008 May 8.
3
Comparison of midazolam (Ro 21-3981) and diazepam as complement of ketamine-air anesthesia in children.
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1986;37(1):15-22.
4
[Midazolam combined with neuroleptanesthesia as a hypnotic].咪达唑仑联合神经安定麻醉作为催眠药
Cah Anesthesiol. 1984 Dec;32(8):661-4.
5
Changes in the auditory evoked potentials index by induction doses of four different intravenous anesthetics.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Oct;49(9):1326-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00820.x.
6
Cardiopulmonary effects of anesthetic induction with thiopental, propofol, or a combination of ketamine hydrochloride and diazepam in dogs sedated with a combination of medetomidine and hydromorphone.在使用美托咪定和氢吗啡酮联合镇静的犬中,硫喷妥钠、丙泊酚或盐酸氯胺酮与地西泮联合进行麻醉诱导的心肺效应。
Am J Vet Res. 2008 May;69(5):586-95. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.69.5.586.
7
Comparative cardiovascular effects of midazolam and thiopental in healthy patients.咪达唑仑与硫喷妥钠对健康患者心血管系统影响的比较
Anesth Analg. 1982 Sep;61(9):771-5.
8
[Cardiocirculatory effects of intravenous anesthetic induction in an experimental model of acute hypovolemia].[急性低血容量实验模型中静脉麻醉诱导的心脏循环效应]
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 1998 Oct;45(8):333-9.
9
Can analysis of the bispectral index prove helpful when monitoring titration of doses of midazolam and ketamine for sedation during paediatric cardiac catheterization.在小儿心脏导管插入术期间监测咪达唑仑和氯胺酮剂量滴定以进行镇静时,脑电双频指数分析是否有用?
Cardiol Young. 2008 Feb;18(1):51-7. doi: 10.1017/S1047951107001679. Epub 2007 Dec 20.
10
Evaluation of cardiovascular effects of total intravenous anesthesia with propofol or a combination of ketamine-medetomidine-propofol in horses.马使用丙泊酚全静脉麻醉或氯胺酮-美托咪定-丙泊酚联合麻醉对心血管系统影响的评估。
Am J Vet Res. 2007 Feb;68(2):121-7. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.68.2.121.

引用本文的文献

1
Antidepressant efficacy of ketamine in treatment-resistant major depression: a two-site randomized controlled trial.氯胺酮治疗难治性重度抑郁症的疗效:一项双中心随机对照试验。
Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Oct;170(10):1134-42. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13030392.
2
Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia.吗啡与吗啡联合氯胺酮用于术后镇痛的比较。
Can J Anaesth. 1996 Mar;43(3):212-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03011736.
3
New intravenous anaesthetics and neuromuscular blocking drugs. A review of their properties and clinical use.
新型静脉麻醉药和神经肌肉阻滞药。其特性及临床应用综述。
Drugs. 1987 Jul;34(1):98-135. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198734010-00004.