Entwistle Vikki A, Watt Ian S, Gilhooly Ken, Bugge Carol, Haites Neva, Walker Anne E
Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland, UK.
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Oct;55(1):105-13. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.08.005.
In the context of a qualitative study exploring patients' participation in decision-making, we investigated how people interpret and respond to structured questions about decision-making about their health care. Seventy-four participants who attended consultations in five clinical areas completed structured measures of decision-making and discussed their responses during interviews. They identified a range of decisions as having being made in their consultations. People who picked particular responses on measures of participation in and satisfaction with decision-making gave varied explanations for these, not all of which were consistent with the way their responses are usually interpreted. The interview data suggest that people's evaluations of decisions to follow a particular course of action were influenced by various factors including what they focused on as the alternative, their perceptions of constraints on choices, and their assessment of how good the best possible solution was. Responses to simple structured measures of participation in and satisfaction with decision-making should be interpreted with caution. They are not reliably attributable to health care providers' actions and are thus unsuitable for performance assessment purposes.
在一项探索患者参与决策的定性研究中,我们调查了人们如何解读和回应关于其医疗保健决策的结构化问题。74名在五个临床领域参加会诊的参与者完成了决策的结构化测评,并在访谈中讨论了他们的回答。他们确定在会诊过程中做出了一系列决策。在参与决策和对决策满意度的测评中给出特定回答的人对这些回答给出了不同的解释,并非所有解释都与通常对他们回答的解读方式一致。访谈数据表明,人们对采取特定行动方案决策的评估受到多种因素影响,包括他们将什么视为替代方案、他们对选择限制的看法,以及他们对最佳可能解决方案有多好的评估。对参与决策和对决策满意度的简单结构化测评的回答应谨慎解读。它们不能可靠地归因于医疗保健提供者的行为,因此不适用于绩效评估目的。