Wiegratz Inka, Kuhl Herbert
Center of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Drugs. 2004;64(21):2447-62. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200464210-00006.
The conventional regimen of oral contraceptive (OC) use mimics the natural cycles by causing regular withdrawal bleeding, which can be avoided by omission of the hormone-free interval of 7 days. Consequently, long-cycle regimens with continuous administration of OCs for 3 or 6 months followed by a hormone-free interval of 7 days may reduce the frequency of menstruations and cycle-dependent complaints. Surveys have revealed that, despite a higher rate of irregular bleeding, the majority of women prefer the long-cycle regimen to the conventional OC regimen with regular bleeds every 4 weeks because it may improve quality of life. As this regimen increases the contraceptive efficacy to a large degree, continuous treatment with OCs may prevent unintended pregnancies in women who miss a pill or are concomitantly treated with drugs that are able to impair the efficacy of OCs. Postponement of withdrawal bleeding may also reduce or prevent menses-associated disorders such as hypermenorrhoea and dysmenorrhoea, and have beneficial effects in patients with haemorrhagic diathesis, endometriosis, uterine leiomyoma and polycystic ovary syndrome. Continuous use of OCs prevents the cyclic fluctuations of serum levels of ethinylestradiol and progestogen and, hence, the cyclic variations of metabolic serum parameters. Although the long-cycle regimen is initially associated with an elevated rate of irregular bleeding, the total number of bleeding days that require sanitary product protection is lower than during conventional OC treatment. Many physicians tend to prescribe extended OC cycles for postponement of menstruation or reduction of frequency of regular bleeding. This review summarises and examines the available data on OC long-cycle regimens. The data suggest that the rate of treatment-related side effects with OCs according to the long-cycle regimen is similar to that of conventional OC regimens. However, clinical trials are necessary to assess the impact of long-term OC long cycles on safety, particularly the risk of cancer and cardiovascular disease, and fertility after discontinuation of treatment.
传统口服避孕药(OC)的使用方案通过引发规律性撤药性出血来模拟自然周期,而省略7天的无激素间隔期可避免这种情况。因此,连续服用OC 3个月或6个月,随后有7天无激素间隔期的长周期方案,可能会减少月经频率以及与周期相关的不适。调查显示,尽管不规则出血发生率较高,但大多数女性更喜欢长周期方案,而非每4周规律出血的传统OC方案,因为它可能改善生活质量。由于该方案在很大程度上提高了避孕效果,持续服用OC可预防漏服避孕药或同时接受可能削弱OC效果的药物治疗的女性意外怀孕。推迟撤药性出血还可能减少或预防与月经相关的疾病,如月经过多和痛经,对有出血素质、子宫内膜异位症、子宫肌瘤和多囊卵巢综合征的患者有有益影响。持续使用OC可防止炔雌醇和孕激素血清水平的周期性波动,从而防止代谢血清参数的周期性变化。尽管长周期方案最初与较高的不规则出血发生率相关,但需要使用卫生用品防护的出血天数总数低于传统OC治疗期间。许多医生倾向于开具延长的OC周期以推迟月经或减少规律出血的频率。本综述总结并研究了关于OC长周期方案的现有数据。数据表明,根据长周期方案使用OC的治疗相关副作用发生率与传统OC方案相似。然而,有必要进行临床试验以评估长期OC长周期对安全性的影响,特别是癌症和心血管疾病风险,以及停药后的生育能力。