Lim Meng-Kin
Department of Community, Occupational and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Singapore, MD3, 16 Medical Drive, Singapore 117597, Singapore.
Health Policy. 2004 Jul;69(1):83-92. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.12.009.
Since becoming independent in 1965, Singapore has attained high standards in health care provision while successfully transferring a substantial portion of the health care burden to the private sector. The government's share of total health care expenditure contracted from 50% in 1965 to 25% in 2000. At first glance, the efficiency-driven health care financing reforms which emphasize individual over state responsibility appear to have been implemented at the expense of equity. On closer examination, however, Singaporeans themselves seem unconcerned about any perceived inequity of the system. Indeed, they appear content to pay part of their medical expenses, plus additional monies if they demand a higher level of services. In fact, access to needed care for the poor is explicitly guaranteed. Mechanisms also exist to protect against financial impoverishment resulting from catastrophic illness. Singapore's experience provides an interesting case study in public-private partnership, illustrating how a hard-headed approach to health policy can achieve national health goals while balancing efficiency and equity concerns.
自1965年独立以来,新加坡在医疗保健服务方面达到了高标准,同时成功地将很大一部分医疗负担转移到了私营部门。政府在医疗保健总支出中的份额从1965年的50%降至2000年的25%。乍一看,强调个人责任而非国家责任的、以效率为导向的医疗保健筹资改革似乎是以牺牲公平为代价实施的。然而,仔细观察会发现,新加坡人自己似乎并不关心该体系中任何被认为存在的不公平现象。事实上,他们似乎愿意支付部分医疗费用,如果他们需要更高水平的服务,还愿意额外付费。实际上,明确保障了穷人获得所需医疗服务的机会。也存在一些机制来防止因重大疾病导致的经济贫困。新加坡的经验为公私合作伙伴关系提供了一个有趣的案例研究,说明了一种务实的卫生政策方法如何在平衡效率和公平问题的同时实现国家卫生目标。