• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化俄勒冈州的医院资源。基于选择性医疗利用差异的一个例子。

Prioritizing Oregon's hospital resources. An example based on variations in discretionary medical utilization.

作者信息

Fisher E S, Welch H G, Wennberg J E

机构信息

Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03755-3862.

出版信息

JAMA. 1992 Apr 8;267(14):1925-31. doi: 10.1001/jama.267.14.1925.

DOI:10.1001/jama.267.14.1925
PMID:1548824
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To provide an alternative to Oregon's treatment-specific approach to rationing, we propose a prioritization based on the local hospital resources invested in discretionary medical admissions.

DESIGN

We used 1988 Oregon hospital discharge data to determine age- and sex-adjusted per-capita rates of inpatient days for discretionary medical admissions (for high-variation medical conditions) in each of 33 hospital service areas. Potential ceiling rates were defined based on prevailing utilization rates for discretionary medical admissions in each hospital service area. Savings were calculated under the assumption that resources allocated for inpatient treatment of these conditions in areas that exceed the ceiling rates were reduced accordingly.

SETTING

Nonfederal, acute-care hospitals used by Oregon residents.

STUDY POPULATION

Oregon residents.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Savings were defined in terms of patient days, hospital beds, hospital charges, and average costs.

RESULTS

Among the 16 largest hospital service areas, patient-day rates for discretionary medical admissions ranged from 188 to 335 patient days per thousand. Potential savings from applying different ceiling rates ranged from $0.4 million to $94.7 million per year. If the rate in the state capital (Salem) were used as the ceiling (218 days per thousand), then 238 beds could be closed in 20 hospital service areas, for an estimated cost savings of $47.3 million.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital resources invested in discretionary admissions in high-rate areas represent an important potential source of funds for reallocation to meet other defined health care needs. Setting limits based on units of health care supply (eg, beds, capital equipment, and physicians) should be considered as an option for resource reallocation within health care.

摘要

目的

为替代俄勒冈州按治疗项目配给的方法,我们提议根据当地医院在选择性医疗入院方面投入的资源进行优先排序。

设计

我们使用1988年俄勒冈州医院出院数据来确定33个医院服务区中每个区针对选择性医疗入院(针对高变异医疗状况)的年龄和性别调整后的人均住院天数率。根据每个医院服务区选择性医疗入院的普遍利用率确定潜在上限率。假设超过上限率地区用于这些疾病住院治疗的资源相应减少,计算节约情况。

地点

俄勒冈州居民使用的非联邦急症护理医院。

研究人群

俄勒冈州居民。

主要结局指标

节约情况根据患者住院天数、医院病床数、医院收费和平均成本来定义。

结果

在16个最大的医院服务区中,选择性医疗入院的患者住院天数率为每千人188至335天。应用不同上限率的潜在节约金额每年从40万美元到9470万美元不等。如果将州府(塞勒姆)的比率用作上限(每千人218天),那么20个医院服务区可关闭238张病床,估计节约成本4730万美元。

结论

高比率地区在选择性入院方面投入的医院资源是重新分配以满足其他明确医疗保健需求的重要潜在资金来源。应考虑将基于医疗保健供应单位(如病床、资本设备和医生)设定限制作为医疗保健内部资源重新分配的一种选择。

相似文献

1
Prioritizing Oregon's hospital resources. An example based on variations in discretionary medical utilization.优化俄勒冈州的医院资源。基于选择性医疗利用差异的一个例子。
JAMA. 1992 Apr 8;267(14):1925-31. doi: 10.1001/jama.267.14.1925.
2
Oregon's plan. Should it be approved?俄勒冈州的计划。它应该被批准吗?
JAMA. 1991 Nov 6;266(17):2439-45. doi: 10.1001/jama.266.17.2439.
3
Oregon's bold experiment: whatever happened to rationing?俄勒冈州的大胆尝试:定量配给制后来怎样了?
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1999 Feb;24(1):147-60. doi: 10.1215/03616878-24-1-147.
4
A history of Oregon's Basic Health Services Act: an insider's account.俄勒冈州《基本医疗服务法案》的历史:一位知情人的讲述。
QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1991 May;17(5):144-9. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30445-6.
5
The Oregon experiment: the role of cost-benefit analysis in the allocation of Medicaid funds.俄勒冈实验:成本效益分析在医疗补助资金分配中的作用。
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Aug;45(4):545-54. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00395-4.
6
Hospitals prepare for start of Oregon health plan prototype.医院为俄勒冈州医疗计划原型的启动做准备。
Health Care Strateg Manage. 1993 May;11(5):10-1.
7
Oregon's experiment.俄勒冈州的实验。
Health Care Anal. 1993 Jun;1(1):15-32. doi: 10.1007/BF02196966.
8
Justice and the moral acceptability of rationing medical care: the Oregon experiment.医疗资源分配的公正性与道德可接受性:俄勒冈州的实验。
J Med Philos. 1992 Feb;17(1):97-117. doi: 10.1093/jmp/17.1.97.
9
Oregon's Medicaid ranking and cost-effectiveness: is there any relationship?俄勒冈州医疗补助计划的排名与成本效益:二者有关联吗?
Med Decis Making. 1996 Apr-Jun;16(2):99-107. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9601600201.
10
Setting health care priorities in Oregon. Cost-effectiveness meets the rule of rescue.俄勒冈州的医疗保健优先事项设定。成本效益与救援原则相遇。
JAMA. 1991 May 1;265(17):2218-25.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethics and value strategies used in prioritizing mental health services in Oregon.俄勒冈州在心理健康服务优先级划分中所采用的伦理与价值策略。
HEC Forum. 1993 Sep;5(5):322-39. doi: 10.1007/BF01560486.
2
Oregon's health care rationing plan. Committee on Bioethical Issues of the Medical Society of the State of New York.俄勒冈州的医疗保健配给计划。纽约州医学协会生物伦理问题委员会。
J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Feb;11(2):104-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02599586.
3
Who's in charge here? Maximizing patient benefit and professional authority by physician limit setting.
这里谁负责?通过设定医生权限来最大化患者利益和专业权威。
J Gen Intern Med. 1994 Aug;9(8):450-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02599063.
4
An integer programming model to limit hospital selection in studies with repeated sampling.一种用于在重复抽样研究中限制医院选择的整数规划模型。
Health Serv Res. 1995 Jun;30(2):359-76.
5
Costs and coverage. Pressures toward health care reform.
West J Med. 1992 Nov;157(5):576-83.