Carlson Caryn L, Booth Jane E, Shin Misung, Canu Will H
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, 78712, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 2002 Mar-Apr;35(2):104-13. doi: 10.1177/002221940203500202.
The motivational styles of 25 children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, combined type (ADHD/C), 13 children with ADHD, inattentive type (ADHD/IA), and 25 nondiagnosed controls (NC) were compared using parent, teacher, and self-ratings. Both ADHD subtypes demonstrated motivational impairment characterized by a preference for easy work, less enjoyment of learning, less persistence, and a greater reliance on external than on internal standards to judge their performance relative to NC. Some motivational style differences between ADHD subtypes were also revealed, with the ADHD/C group more motivated by competitiveness and a desire to be perceived as superior to others and the ADHD/IA group less uncooperative and possibly more passive in their learning styles. When IQ was statistically controlled, these results were generally unchanged. The contributing role of motivational deficits to the generally poor academic functioning of children with ADHD is discussed, along with potential intervention implications of the divergent motivational styles of different ADHD subtypes.
采用家长、教师和自我评定的方式,对25名注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)混合型患儿、13名注意力不集中型ADHD患儿以及25名未确诊的对照儿童(NC)的动机风格进行了比较。两种ADHD亚型均表现出动机损害,其特征为偏好简单任务、对学习的乐趣较少、坚持性较差,且与NC组相比,在判断自身表现时更依赖外部而非内部标准。研究还揭示了ADHD亚型之间在动机风格上的一些差异,ADHD/C组更受竞争以及渴望被视为比他人优越的驱动,而ADHD/IA组在学习风格上不那么不合作,可能更消极。在对智商进行统计学控制后,这些结果总体上没有变化。本文讨论了动机缺陷对ADHD患儿普遍较差的学业表现的促成作用,以及不同ADHD亚型不同动机风格的潜在干预意义。