Fuchs Lynn S, Fuchs Douglas
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 2002 Nov-Dec;35(6):563-73. doi: 10.1177/00222194020350060701.
The purpose of this study was to describe the mathematical problem-solving profiles of students with mathematics disabilities (MD) with and without comorbid reading disabilities (RD). The disability status of fourth-grade students was verified through testing (n = 18 MD; n = 22 MD + RD). Then a hierarchy of mathematics problem-solving tasks was administered. The results demonstrated large deficits for both groups; however, the differences between students with MD and those with MD + RD were mediated by the level of problem solving (arithmetic story problems vs. complex story problems vs. real-world problem solving) and by performance dimension (operations vs. problem solving). On arithmetic story problems, the differences between the disability subtypes were similar for operations and problem solving. By contrast, on complex story problems and real-world problem solving, the differences between the subtypes were larger for problem solving than for operations.
本研究的目的是描述有和没有合并阅读障碍(RD)的数学障碍(MD)学生的数学问题解决概况。通过测试核实了四年级学生的残疾状况(n = 18名MD;n = 22名MD + RD)。然后实施了一个数学问题解决任务层次结构。结果表明两组学生都存在很大缺陷;然而,MD学生和MD + RD学生之间的差异是由问题解决水平(算术应用题与复杂应用题与现实世界问题解决)和表现维度(运算与问题解决)介导的。在算术应用题上,残疾亚型之间在运算和问题解决方面的差异相似。相比之下,在复杂应用题和现实世界问题解决方面,亚型之间在问题解决方面的差异比在运算方面的差异更大。