Cirino Paul T, Fuchs Lynn S, Elias John T, Powell Sarah R, Schumacher Robin F
University of Houston, TX, USA
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 2015 Mar-Apr;48(2):156-75. doi: 10.1177/0022219413494239. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
The purpose of this study was to compare subgroups of students with various forms of learning difficulties (< 25th percentile) on cognitive and mathematics characteristics. Students with mathematics difficulty (MD, n = 105), reading difficulty (RD, n = 65), both (MDRD, n = 87), or neither (NoLD, n = 403) were evaluated on an array of cognitive measures (e.g., working memory and language) and on mathematics measures of foundational numerical competencies, computation, and problem solving. Results revealed expected level differences among groups in both domains: NoLD outperformed RD, and MD outperformed MDRD. Profile differences were noted among pairs of subgroups on cognitive measures. On mathematics measures, profile differences were noted between RD and other subgroups, but not between MD and MDRD subgroups. The most discriminating cognitive measures were processing speed and language; the most discriminating mathematics measures depended on the subgroups being compared. Results were further evaluated according to more severe (< 10th percentile) criteria for MD and RD, which generally affected level differences more than the profile patterns. Results have implications for understanding comorbid MD and RD and for conceptualizing core deficits in MD.
本研究的目的是比较有各种学习困难形式(低于第25百分位数)的学生亚组在认知和数学特征方面的差异。对有数学困难(MD,n = 105)、阅读困难(RD,n = 65)、两者皆有(MDRD,n = 87)或两者皆无(无学习困难,NoLD,n = 403)的学生进行了一系列认知测量(如工作记忆和语言)以及基础数字能力、计算和问题解决的数学测量。结果显示,在这两个领域中,各亚组之间存在预期的水平差异:无学习困难组的表现优于阅读困难组,数学困难组的表现优于数学和阅读双困难组。在认知测量方面,各亚组对之间存在特征差异。在数学测量方面,阅读困难组与其他亚组之间存在特征差异,但数学困难组与数学和阅读双困难组之间不存在特征差异。最具区分性的认知测量是处理速度和语言;最具区分性的数学测量取决于所比较的亚组。根据更严重(低于第10百分位数)的数学困难和阅读困难标准对结果进行了进一步评估,这些标准对水平差异的影响通常大于特征模式。研究结果对于理解数学困难和阅读困难的共病情况以及概念化数学困难的核心缺陷具有启示意义。