Teisl J T, Mazzocco M M, Myers G F
Johns Hopkins University, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 2001 May-Jun;34(3):286-93. doi: 10.1177/002221940103400308.
The purpose of this study was to assess the predictive value of kindergarten teachers' ratings of pupils for later first-grade academic achievement. Kindergarten students were rated by their teachers on a variety of variables, including math and reading performance, teacher concerns, and amount of learning relative to peers. These variables were then analyzed with respect to outcome measures for math and reading ability administered in the first grade. The teachers' ratings of academic performance were significantly correlated with scores on the outcome measures. Analyses were also carried out to determine sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the different teacher ratings. The results indicated high overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value for the ratings. Positive predictive value tended to be lower. A recommendation to follow from these results is that teacher ratings of this sort be used to determine which children should receive cognitive screening measures to further enhance identification of children at risk for learning disability. However, this recommendation is limited by the lack of empirically supported screening measures for math disability versus well-supported screening tools for reading disability.
本研究的目的是评估幼儿园教师对学生的评分对其一年级后期学业成绩的预测价值。幼儿园学生由教师根据各种变量进行评分,包括数学和阅读表现、教师关注的问题以及相对于同龄人而言的学习量。然后针对一年级进行的数学和阅读能力结果测量对这些变量进行分析。教师对学业表现的评分与结果测量的分数显著相关。还进行了分析以确定不同教师评分的敏感性、特异性和预测价值。结果表明评分的总体准确性、敏感性、特异性和阴性预测价值较高。阳性预测价值往往较低。从这些结果得出的一个建议是,此类教师评分应用于确定哪些儿童应接受认知筛查措施,以进一步加强对有学习障碍风险儿童的识别。然而,这一建议受到缺乏针对数学障碍的实证支持的筛查措施以及针对阅读障碍的完善筛查工具的限制。