一项关于盐酸右哌甲酯和盐酸消旋苏式哌甲酯治疗注意力缺陷/多动障碍儿童的双盲、安慰剂对照试验。

A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of dexmethylphenidate hydrochloride and d,l-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

作者信息

Wigal Sharon, Swanson James M, Feifel David, Sangal R Bart, Elia Josephine, Casat Charles D, Zeldis Jerome B, Conners C Keith

机构信息

Irvine Child Development Center, University of California, Irvine, CA 92612, USA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004 Nov;43(11):1406-14. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000138351.98604.92.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dexmethylphenidate hydrochloride (d-MPH, Focalin) for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and to test an a priori hypothesis that d-MPH would have a longer duration of action than d,l-threo-methylphenidate (d,l-MPH).

METHOD

This was a randomized, double-blind study conducted at 12 U.S. centers. One hundred thirty-two subjects received d-MPH (n=44), d,l-MPH (n=46), or placebo (n=42) twice daily for 4 weeks, with titration of the dose based on weekly clinic visits. The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline to last study visit on teacher-completed Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Rating Scale (Teacher SNAP). Secondary efficacy measures included the change on parent-completed SNAP (Parent SNAP), Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Improvement (CGI-I) score, and Math Test performance. Assessments at home in late afternoon were included to test the hypothesis that d-MPH would have a longer duration of efficacy than d,l-MPH. Safety was assessed through monitoring occurrence and severity of adverse events and discontinuations related to them.

RESULTS

Treatment with either d-MPH (p=.0004) or d,l-MPH (p=.0042) significantly improved Teacher SNAP ratings compared with placebo. The d-MPH group showed significant improvements compared with placebo on the afternoon Parent SNAP ratings (p=.0003) and scores on the Math Test (p=.0236) obtained late in the afternoon at 6:00 p.m. Sixty-seven percent of patients showed improvement on d-MPH and 49% on d,l-MPH based on CGI-I scores. Both d-MPH and d,l-MPH were well tolerated, no patient in the d-MPH group and only two patients each in the d,l-MPH and placebo groups discontinued the study.

CONCLUSIONS

For the treatment of ADHD, an average titrated dose of 18.25 mg/day of d-MPH is as efficacious and safe as an average titrated dose of 32.14 mg/day of d,l-MPH. Both active treatments have large effect sizes. Thus, d-MPH and d,l-MPH appear to provide similar efficacy, and d-MPH may have longer duration of action after twice-daily dosing, but additional studies are needed to determine the statistical and clinical significance of this possibility.

摘要

目的

评估盐酸右哌甲酯(d-MPH,专注达)治疗注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的疗效和安全性,并检验一个先验假设,即d-MPH的作用持续时间比消旋-苏式-哌甲酯(d,l-MPH)更长。

方法

这是一项在美国12个中心进行的随机双盲研究。132名受试者每日两次接受d-MPH(n = 44)、d,l-MPH(n = 46)或安慰剂(n = 42)治疗,为期4周,并根据每周的门诊就诊情况调整剂量。主要疗效变量是从基线到最后一次研究访视时教师完成的斯旺森、诺兰和佩勒姆评定量表(教师SNAP)的变化。次要疗效指标包括家长完成的SNAP(家长SNAP)、临床总体印象改善量表(CGI-I)评分以及数学测试成绩的变化。纳入下午晚些时候的家庭评估以检验d-MPH的疗效持续时间比d,l-MPH更长这一假设。通过监测不良事件的发生和严重程度以及与之相关的停药情况来评估安全性。

结果

与安慰剂相比,d-MPH(p = 0.0004)或d,l-MPH(p = 0.0042)治疗均显著改善了教师SNAP评分。d-MPH组在下午的家长SNAP评分(p = 0.0003)和下午6点获得的数学测试成绩(p = 0.0236)方面与安慰剂相比有显著改善。根据CGI-I评分,67%的患者在d-MPH治疗下有改善,49%的患者在d,l-MPH治疗下有改善。d-MPH和d,l-MPH耐受性均良好,d-MPH组无患者停药,d,l-MPH组和安慰剂组各仅有两名患者停药。

结论

对于ADHD的治疗,平均滴定剂量为每日18.25 mg的d-MPH与平均滴定剂量为每日32.14 mg的d,l-MPH疗效相当且同样安全。两种活性治疗的效应量都很大。因此,d-MPH和d,l-MPH似乎提供相似的疗效,并且每日两次给药后d-MPH的作用持续时间可能更长,但需要进一步研究来确定这种可能性的统计学和临床意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索