Boockvar Kenneth S, Litke Ann, Penrod Joan D, Halm Ethan A, Morrison R Sean, Silberzweig Stacey B, Magaziner Jay, Koval Kenneth, Siu Albert L
Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Bronx Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 130 W. Kingsbridge Road, Bronx, NY 10468, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Nov;52(11):1826-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52512.x.
To describe the incidence and patterns of patient relocation after hip fracture, identify factors associated with relocation, and examine effect of relocation on outcomes.
Prospective cohort study.
Four hospitals in the New York metropolitan area.
A total of 562 patients hospitalized for hip fracture discharged alive in 1997 to 1998.
Patient characteristics and hospital course were ascertained using patient or surrogate interview, research nurse assessment, and medical record review. Patient location was ascertained at five time points using patient or surrogate interview, and hospital readmissions were identified using New York state and hospital admission databases. Mobility was measured using patient or surrogate report using the Functional Independence Measure.
During 6 months of follow-up, the mean number of relocations per patient+/-standard deviation was 3.5+/-1.5 (range 2-10). Forty-one percent of relocations were between home and hospital, 36% between rehabilitation or nursing facility and hospital, 17% between rehabilitation or nursing facility and home, and 4% between two rehabilitation/nursing facilities. In a Poisson regression model that controlled for patient characteristics, hospital course, and length of follow-up, factors associated with relocation (P<.05) were absence of dementia, in-hospital delirium, one or more new impairments at hospital discharge, hospital discharge other than to home, and not living at home alone prefracture. Relocation was not significantly associated with immobility or mortality at 6 months (odds ratio=1.14, 95% confidence interval=0.97-1.35).
Subgroups of patients with elevated risk of relocation after hip fracture may be target groups for intensive care coordination and care planning interventions.
描述髋部骨折后患者转院的发生率及模式,确定与转院相关的因素,并研究转院对治疗结果的影响。
前瞻性队列研究。
纽约大都市地区的四家医院。
1997年至1998年期间因髋部骨折住院且存活出院的562名患者。
通过患者或替代者访谈、研究护士评估及病历审查确定患者特征和住院过程。通过患者或替代者访谈在五个时间点确定患者位置,并使用纽约州和医院入院数据库识别医院再入院情况。使用功能独立性测量量表通过患者或替代者报告测量活动能力。
在6个月的随访期间,每位患者的平均转院次数±标准差为3.5±1.5(范围为2至10次)。41%的转院发生在家庭与医院之间,36%发生在康复机构或护理机构与医院之间,17%发生在康复机构或护理机构与家庭之间,4%发生在两个康复/护理机构之间。在控制了患者特征、住院过程和随访时间的泊松回归模型中,与转院相关的因素(P<0.05)包括无痴呆、住院期间谵妄、出院时出现一项或多项新的功能障碍、出院后不住在家中以及骨折前并非独自居住在家中。转院与6个月时的活动能力受限或死亡率无显著关联(优势比=1.14,95%置信区间=0.97至1.35)。
髋部骨折后转院风险较高的患者亚组可能是重症护理协调和护理计划干预的目标群体。