• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大数据驱动的髋部骨折患者住院时间的决定因素。

Big Data-Driven Determinants of Length of Stay for Patients with Hip Fracture.

机构信息

Department of Healthcare Management, Youngsan University, Yangsan 50510, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 9;17(14):4949. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17144949.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17144949
PMID:32659953
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7400185/
Abstract

It is important that length of stay (LOS) management for alleviating health care financial burdens and improving patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to report the differences of LOS and the factors affecting LOS of hip fracture patients using big data. A total of 463,194 data were collected from 2016 to 2017 KNHDS. Of those, 2238 patients with the hip fracture primary diagnosis were included in the study population. As independent variables were used gender, age, type of insurance, admission route, result of treatment, number of hospital beds, the presence of surgery, and comorbidities. Statistical analysis performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25.0. A statistically significant difference was observed in the length of stay of hip fracture patients according to the healthcare insurance type. The difference in LOS associated with comorbidities was statistically significant for hypertension, peptic ulcer disease, coagulopathy, and alcohol abuse ( < 0.05). Independent variables that affected LOS of hip fracture patients with national health insurance were the treatment result, operation presence, comorbidity count, and hospital beds ( < 0.001). The factors associated with the length of stay for hip fracture patients were the difference according to the healthcare insurance type. The results of this study can be used as a basic data for the national health policy for the proper distribution and utilization of medical resources.

摘要

本研究旨在利用大数据报告髋部骨折患者住院日(LOS)的差异和影响 LOS 的因素。从 2016 年至 2017 年 KNHDS 中收集了总计 463,194 份数据。在研究人群中,包括了 2238 例髋部骨折的主要诊断患者。性别、年龄、保险类型、入院途径、治疗结果、医院床位数量、手术情况和合并症作为自变量。使用 IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows,版本 25.0 进行统计分析。根据医疗保健保险类型,髋部骨折患者的住院日存在统计学显著差异。与高血压、消化性溃疡病、凝血障碍和酗酒相关的 LOS 差异具有统计学意义(<0.05)。影响具有国民健康保险的髋部骨折患者 LOS 的独立变量是治疗结果、手术存在、合并症计数和医院床位(<0.001)。与髋部骨折患者住院日相关的因素是医疗保健保险类型的差异。本研究的结果可作为国家卫生政策的基本数据,用于医疗资源的合理分配和利用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe63/7400185/ec53215c970d/ijerph-17-04949-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe63/7400185/ec53215c970d/ijerph-17-04949-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe63/7400185/ec53215c970d/ijerph-17-04949-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Big Data-Driven Determinants of Length of Stay for Patients with Hip Fracture.大数据驱动的髋部骨折患者住院时间的决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 9;17(14):4949. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17144949.
2
Shorter length of hospital stay for hip fracture in those with dementia and without a known diagnosis of osteoporosis in the USA.美国的痴呆症患者和无已知骨质疏松症诊断的髋部骨折患者的住院时间更短。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Dec 3;20(1):523. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01924-x.
3
Shorter acute hospital length of stay in hip fracture patients after surgery predicted by early surgery and mobilization.髋部骨折患者手术后住院时间较短可通过早期手术和早期活动来预测。
Arch Osteoporos. 2021 Oct 31;16(1):162. doi: 10.1007/s11657-021-01027-z.
4
Disparities in length of stay for hip fracture treatment between patients treated in safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals.在安全网医院和非安全网医院接受治疗的髋部骨折患者的住院时间差异。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4896-1.
5
Comparing post-acute rehabilitation use, length of stay, and outcomes experienced by Medicare fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with hip fracture in the United States: A secondary analysis of administrative data.比较美国 Medicare 按服务收费和 Medicare Advantage 受益人与髋部骨折相关的康复使用、住院时间和康复结局:基于行政数据的二次分析。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jun 26;15(6):e1002592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002592. eCollection 2018 Jun.
6
Differences in hospital length of stay and total hospital charge by income level in patients hospitalized for hip fractures.髋部骨折患者按收入水平的住院时间和总住院费用差异。
Osteoporos Int. 2022 May;33(5):1067-1078. doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-06260-3. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
7
Association of Length of Stay, Recovery Rate, and Therapy Time per Day With Functional Outcomes After Hip Fracture Surgery.髋部骨折手术后住院时间、恢复率和每天治疗时间与功能结局的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919672. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19672.
8
The Frank Stinchfield Award : Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture Is Not a Typical DRG 470: A Propensity-matched Cohort Study.弗兰克·斯廷奇菲尔德奖:股骨颈骨折的全髋关节置换术并非典型的诊断相关分组470:一项倾向匹配队列研究
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Feb;475(2):353-360. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4868-2.
9
Does Admission to Medicine or Orthopaedics Impact a Geriatric Hip Patient's Hospital Length of Stay?入住内科或骨科对老年髋部患者的住院时间有影响吗?
J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Feb;30(2):95-9. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000440.
10
Variation in Resource Utilization for Patients With Hip and Pelvic Fractures Despite Equal Medicare Reimbursement.尽管医疗保险报销相同,但髋部和骨盆骨折患者的资源利用情况仍存在差异。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jun;474(6):1486-94. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4765-8. Epub 2016 Feb 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations between patient characteristics and delayed acute care discharge post-hip fracture surgery: a cohort study using linked health administrative data in Ontario, Canada.髋部骨折手术后患者特征与急性护理延迟出院之间的关联:一项使用加拿大安大略省相关健康管理数据的队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 4;26(1):595. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08747-0.
2
Strategies to Reduce Hospital Length of Stay: Evidence and Challenges.缩短住院时间的策略:证据与挑战
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 May 20;61(5):922. doi: 10.3390/medicina61050922.
3
The use of minimum common data set in the development of the Greek Fragility Hip Fracture Registry in the Greek health care setting: the first year of its pilot implementation.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of socio-economic status on hospital length of stay following injury: a multicenter cohort study.社会经济地位对受伤后住院时间的影响:一项多中心队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 25;15:285. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0949-2.
2
The Determinants of Costs and Length of Stay for Hip Fracture Patients.髋部骨折患者的费用和住院时间的决定因素
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 23;10(7):e0133545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133545. eCollection 2015.
3
Total hospital stay for hip fracture: measuring the variations due to pre-fracture residence, rehabilitation, complications and comorbidities.
在希腊医疗保健环境中使用最小临床数据集开发希腊脆性髋部骨折登记处:其试点实施的第一年。
Arch Osteoporos. 2024 Sep 6;19(1):85. doi: 10.1007/s11657-024-01443-x.
4
Incorporating preoperative frailty to assist in early prediction of postoperative pneumonia in elderly patients with hip fractures: an externally validated online interpretable machine learning model.将术前脆弱性纳入其中,有助于早期预测老年髋部骨折患者术后肺炎:一种经外部验证的在线可解释机器学习模型。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 May 30;24(1):472. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05050-w.
5
Prediction and the influencing factor study of colorectal cancer hospitalization costs in China based on machine learning-random forest and support vector regression: a retrospective study.基于机器学习-随机森林和支持向量回归的中国结直肠癌住院费用预测及影响因素研究:一项回顾性研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 8;12:1211220. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1211220. eCollection 2024.
6
Predictors of mortality for patients with hip fracture: a study of the nationwide 1-year records of 24,950 fractures in Romania.髋部骨折患者死亡率的预测因素:罗马尼亚全国范围内 24950 例骨折 1 年记录研究。
Arch Osteoporos. 2023 May 17;18(1):69. doi: 10.1007/s11657-023-01253-7.
7
Insurance status and traumatized patients' outcomes: a report from the national trauma registry of Iran.保险状况与创伤患者结局:来自伊朗国家创伤登记处的报告。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 24;23(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09369-9.
8
Construction and validation of a risk prediction model for delayed discharge in elderly patients with hip fracture.构建和验证老年髋部骨折患者延迟出院风险预测模型。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Jan 24;24(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06166-7.
9
Assessment of influencing factors of hospitalization expenses for Crohn's disease patients: Based on LASSO and linear mixed model.基于 LASSO 和线性混合模型评估克罗恩病患者住院费用的影响因素。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 9;10:925616. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.925616. eCollection 2022.
10
Secular trends of incidence and hospitalization cost of hip fracture in Tangshan, China.中国唐山髋部骨折发病率和住院费用的变化趋势。
Osteoporos Int. 2022 Jan;33(1):89-96. doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-06050-x. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
髋部骨折患者的总住院时间:测量因骨折前居住情况、康复、并发症和合并症导致的差异。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jan 22;15:17. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0697-3.
4
Characterizing the relationship between in-hospital measures and workers' compensation outcomes among severely injured construction workers using a data linkage strategy.利用数据链接策略描述严重受伤建筑工人住院措施与工人赔偿结果之间的关系。
Am J Ind Med. 2013 Oct;56(10):1149-56. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22212. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
5
Reducing unnecessary hospital days to improve quality of care through physician accountability: a cluster randomised trial.通过医生问责制减少不必要的住院天数以提高护理质量:一项集群随机试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jan 10;13:14. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-14.
6
Osteoporosis: burden, health care provision and opportunities in the EU: a report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA).骨质疏松症:欧盟的负担、医疗保健提供及机遇:与国际骨质疏松症基金会(IOF)和欧洲制药工业协会联合会(EFPIA)合作编写的报告
Arch Osteoporos. 2011;6:59-155. doi: 10.1007/s11657-011-0060-1.
7
Hip fracture management: tailoring care for the older patient.髋部骨折管理:为老年患者定制护理。
JAMA. 2012 May 23;307(20):2185-94. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.4842.
8
Impact of comorbidities on hospitalization costs following hip fracture.合并症对髋部骨折后住院费用的影响。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jan 4;94(1):9-17. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01077.
9
Management of hip fracture in adults: summary of NICE guidance.成人髋部骨折的管理:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所指南总结
BMJ. 2011 Jun 21;342:d3304. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d3304.
10
The incidence and residual lifetime risk of osteoporosis-related fractures in Korea.韩国骨质疏松症相关骨折的发病率和剩余寿命风险。
J Bone Miner Metab. 2011 Nov;29(6):744-51. doi: 10.1007/s00774-011-0279-3. Epub 2011 Jun 7.