Phillips Carl V, Goodman Karen J
Management, Policy and Community Health Division, University of Texas School of Public Health, 1200 Pressler, Houston, TX 77225, USA.
Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2004 Oct 4;1(1):3. doi: 10.1186/1742-5573-1-3.
Austin Bradford Hill's landmark 1965 paper contains several important lessons for the current conduct of epidemiology. Unfortunately, it is almost exclusively cited as the source of the "Bradford-Hill criteria" for inferring causation when association is observed, despite Hill's explicit statement that cause-effect decisions cannot be based on a set of rules. Overlooked are Hill's important lessons about how to make decisions based on epidemiologic evidence. He advised epidemiologists to avoid over-emphasizing statistical significance testing, given the observation that systematic error is often greater than random error. His compelling and intuitive examples point out the need to consider costs and benefits when making decisions about health-promoting interventions. These lessons, which offer ways to dramatically increase the contribution of health science to decision making, are as needed today as they were when Hill presented them.
奥斯汀·布拉德福德·希尔1965年具有里程碑意义的论文为当前的流行病学研究提供了几个重要的经验教训。不幸的是,尽管希尔明确表示因果关系的判定不能基于一套规则,但该论文几乎完全被引述为在观察到关联时推断因果关系的“布拉德福德-希尔标准”的来源。希尔关于如何根据流行病学证据做出决策的重要经验教训被忽视了。他建议流行病学家避免过度强调统计显著性检验,因为观察发现系统误差往往大于随机误差。他那些引人入胜且直观的例子指出,在对促进健康的干预措施做出决策时需要考虑成本和收益。这些经验教训提供了大幅增加健康科学对决策贡献的方法,如今和希尔提出它们时一样必要。