Bae Jae Nam, Cho Maeng Je
Department of Psychiatry, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, South Korea.
J Psychosom Res. 2004 Sep;57(3):297-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2004.01.004.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic validity of the Korean version of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-K) and its short form among elderly psychiatric patients.
After three preliminary trials, the authors translated the GDS, including the Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form (SGDS) into Korean. The GDS-K, the Korean version of the SGDS (SGDS-K), Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRS-D), and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) were administered to 154 elderly psychiatric patients. In addition, the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS-III-R) was administered independently to diagnose DSM-III-R major depression. Reliability and validity test, optimal cutoff point estimation, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis were performed to investigate the diagnostic validity of the GDS-K and SGDS-K.
Internal consistency-reliability and concurrent validity of the GDS-K and SGDS-K associated with other depression scales (HRS-D, CES-D) were excellent. Content validity and discriminant validity, which differentiate DSM-III-R major depression from nonmajor depression was also good. We suggest a score of 16 as the optimal cutoff point of GDS-K for screening DSM-III-R major depression among clinical populations and a score of 8 as optimal cutoff score of SGDS-K. ROC curve analysis indicated high diagnostic validity for both GDS-K and SGDS-K in assessing DSM-III-R major depression. Moreover, we found that the GDS-K and SGDS-K were highly correlated (r=.9522). This finding suggests that the SGDS-K can be used as an adequate substitute for the GDS-K.
The GDS-K and SGDS-K proved valid and reliable case-finding tools for screening DSM-III-R major depression among the elderly psychiatric patients in Korea. The relatively high cutoff points of both the GDS-K and SGDS-K require further evaluation from the viewpoint of culturally determined response style in elderly Koreans.
本研究旨在评估韩国版老年抑郁量表(GDS-K)及其简版在老年精神病患者中的诊断效度。
经过三项预试验后,作者将老年抑郁量表(包括老年抑郁量表简版,SGDS)翻译成韩语。对154名老年精神病患者施测GDS-K、韩国版SGDS(SGDS-K)、汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HRS-D)以及流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)。此外,独立施测诊断性访谈量表(DIS-III-R)以诊断DSM-III-R重度抑郁症。进行信效度检验、最佳截断点估计以及受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,以探究GDS-K和SGDS-K的诊断效度。
GDS-K和SGDS-K与其他抑郁量表(HRS-D、CES-D)相关的内部一致性信度和同时效度极佳。区分DSM-III-R重度抑郁症与非重度抑郁症的内容效度和区分效度也良好。我们建议将16分作为GDS-K在临床人群中筛查DSM-III-R重度抑郁症的最佳截断点,将8分作为SGDS-K的最佳截断分数。ROC曲线分析表明GDS-K和SGDS-K在评估DSM-III-R重度抑郁症方面具有较高的诊断效度。此外,我们发现GDS-K和SGDS-K高度相关(r = 0.9522)。这一发现表明SGDS-K可作为GDS-K的适当替代量表。
GDS-K和SGDS-K被证明是在韩国老年精神病患者中筛查DSM-III-R重度抑郁症的有效且可靠的病例发现工具。从韩国老年人文化决定的反应方式角度来看,GDS-K和SGDS-K相对较高的截断点需要进一步评估。