Suppr超能文献

血管闭塞技术的比较:电烙术比结扎术及带筋膜间置的切除术更有效。

A comparison of vas occlusion techniques: cautery more effective than ligation and excision with fascial interposition.

作者信息

Sokal David, Irsula Belinda, Chen-Mok Mario, Labrecque Michel, Barone Mark A

机构信息

Family Health International, PO Box 13950, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.

出版信息

BMC Urol. 2004 Oct 27;4(1):12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-4-12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vasectomy techniques have been the subject of relatively few rigorous studies. The objective of this analysis was to compare the effectiveness of two techniques for vas occlusion: intraluminal cautery versus ligation and excision with fascial interposition. More specifically, we aimed to compare early failure rates, sperm concentrations, and time to success between the two techniques.

METHODS

We compared semen analysis data from men following vasectomy using two occlusion techniques. Data on intraluminal cautery came from a prospective observational study conducted at four sites. Data on ligation and excision with fascial interposition came from a multicenter randomized controlled trial that evaluated the efficacy of ligation and excision with versus without fascial interposition. The surgical techniques used in the fascial interposition study were standardized. The surgeons in the cautery study used their customary techniques, which varied among sites in terms of type of cautery, use of fascial interposition, excision of a short segment of the vas, and use of an open-ended technique. Men in both studies had semen analyses two weeks after vasectomy and then approximately every four weeks. The two outcome measures for the analyses presented here are (a) time to success, defined as severe oligozoospermia, or <100,000 sperm/mL in two consecutive semen analyses; and (b) early vasectomy failure, defined as >10 million sperm/mL at week 12 or later.

RESULTS

Vasectomy with cautery was associated with a significantly more rapid progression to severe oligozoospermia and with significantly fewer early failures (1% versus 5%).

CONCLUSION

The use of cautery improves vasectomy outcomes. Limitations of this comparison include (a) the variety of surgical techniques in the cautery study and differences in methods of fascial interposition between the two studies, (b) the uncertain correlation between sperm concentrations after vasectomy and the risk of pregnancy, and (c) the use of historical controls and different study sites.

摘要

背景

输精管切除术技术一直是相对较少严格研究的主题。本分析的目的是比较两种输精管闭塞技术的有效性:腔内烧灼术与带筋膜间置的结扎切除术。更具体地说,我们旨在比较两种技术之间的早期失败率、精子浓度和达到成功的时间。

方法

我们比较了采用两种闭塞技术进行输精管切除术后男性的精液分析数据。腔内烧灼术的数据来自在四个地点进行的一项前瞻性观察性研究。带筋膜间置的结扎切除术的数据来自一项多中心随机对照试验,该试验评估了带与不带筋膜间置的结扎切除术的疗效。筋膜间置研究中使用的手术技术是标准化的。烧灼术研究中的外科医生使用他们惯用的技术,这些技术在不同地点之间在烧灼类型、筋膜间置的使用、输精管短段的切除以及开放式技术的使用方面存在差异。两项研究中的男性在输精管切除术后两周进行精液分析,然后大约每四周进行一次。此处分析的两个结果指标是:(a)达到成功的时间,定义为严重少精子症,或连续两次精液分析中精子浓度<100,000个/mL;(b)输精管切除术后早期失败,定义为第12周或更晚时精子浓度>1000万个/mL。

结果

烧灼术输精管切除术与严重少精子症进展明显更快以及早期失败明显更少相关(1%对5%)。

结论

烧灼术的使用改善了输精管切除术的结果。这种比较的局限性包括:(a)烧灼术研究中手术技术的多样性以及两项研究之间筋膜间置方法的差异;(b)输精管切除术后精子浓度与妊娠风险之间不确定的相关性;(c)使用历史对照和不同的研究地点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5880/529470/0cce407c3fce/1471-2490-4-12-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验