• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输精管结扎术后早期再通的频率及模式

Frequency and patterns of early recanalization after vasectomy.

作者信息

Labrecque Michel, Hays Melissa, Chen-Mok Mario, Barone Mark A, Sokal David

机构信息

Evaluation Research Unit, D1-724, Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec (CHUQ), Hôpital Saint-François d'Assise, 10, rue de l'Espinay, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Urol. 2006 Sep 19;6:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-6-25.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2490-6-25
PMID:16984640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1586021/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our understanding of early post-vasectomy recanalization is limited to histopathological studies. The objective of this study was to estimate the frequency and to describe semen analysis patterns of early recanalization after vasectomy.

METHODS

Charts displaying serial post-vasectomy semen analyses were created using the semen analysis results from 826 and 389 men participating in a randomized trial of fascial interposition (FI) and an observational study of cautery, respectively. In the FI trial, participants were randomly allocated to vas occlusion by ligation and excision with or without FI. In the cautery study, sites used their usual cautery occlusion technique, two with and two without FI. Presumed early recanalization was based on the assessment of individual semen analysis charts by three independent reviewers. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus.

RESULTS

Presumed early recanalization was characterized by a very low sperm concentration within two weeks after vasectomy followed by return to large numbers of sperm over the next few weeks. The overall proportion of men with presumed early recanalization was 13% (95% CI 12%-15%). The risk was highest with ligation and excision without FI (25%) and lowest for thermal cautery with FI (0%). The highest proportion of presumed early recanalization was observed among men classified as vasectomy failures.

CONCLUSION

Early recanalization, occurring within the first weeks after vasectomy, is more common than generally recognized. Its frequency depends on the occlusion technique performed.

摘要

背景

我们对输精管结扎术后早期再通的了解仅限于组织病理学研究。本研究的目的是评估输精管结扎术后早期再通的发生率,并描述其精液分析模式。

方法

分别使用参与筋膜插入术(FI)随机试验的826名男性和电灼术观察性研究的389名男性的精液分析结果,创建显示输精管结扎术后系列精液分析的图表。在FI试验中,参与者被随机分配接受结扎和切除加或不加FI的输精管闭塞术。在电灼术研究中,各研究地点采用其常用的电灼闭塞技术,其中两个采用了FI,两个未采用FI。假定的早期再通是基于三位独立评审员对个体精液分析图表的评估。通过达成共识解决分歧。

结果

假定的早期再通的特征是输精管结扎术后两周内精子浓度极低,随后在接下来的几周内精子数量恢复到大量。假定有早期再通的男性总体比例为13%(95%CI 12%-15%)。结扎和切除且未行FI的风险最高(25%),而热灼术加FI的风险最低(0%)。在被归类为输精管结扎术失败的男性中,假定早期再通的比例最高。

结论

输精管结扎术后第一周内发生的早期再通比普遍认为的更为常见。其发生率取决于所采用的闭塞技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a91/1586021/57e4ad66564f/1471-2490-6-25-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a91/1586021/61fa79a9318a/1471-2490-6-25-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a91/1586021/57e4ad66564f/1471-2490-6-25-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a91/1586021/61fa79a9318a/1471-2490-6-25-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a91/1586021/57e4ad66564f/1471-2490-6-25-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Frequency and patterns of early recanalization after vasectomy.输精管结扎术后早期再通的频率及模式
BMC Urol. 2006 Sep 19;6:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-6-25.
2
A comparison of vas occlusion techniques: cautery more effective than ligation and excision with fascial interposition.血管闭塞技术的比较:电烙术比结扎术及带筋膜间置的切除术更有效。
BMC Urol. 2004 Oct 27;4(1):12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-4-12.
3
Effectiveness of vasectomy using cautery.烧灼法输精管切除术的有效性。
BMC Urol. 2004 Jul 19;4:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-4-10.
4
Vasectomy surgical techniques in South and South East Asia.南亚和东南亚的输精管切除术手术技术。
BMC Urol. 2005 May 25;5:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-5-10.
5
Vasectomy by ligation and excision, with or without fascial interposition: a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN77781689].输精管结扎切除术,伴或不伴筋膜置入:一项随机对照试验[国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN77781689]
BMC Med. 2004 Mar 31;2:6. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-2-6.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of an initial azoospermic reading compared with results of post-centrifugation semen analysis after vasectomy.输精管结扎术后初始无精子症检测结果与离心后精液分析结果的诊断准确性比较。
J Urol. 2008 Nov;180(5):2119-23. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.062. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
7
Effectiveness and complications associated with 2 vasectomy occlusion techniques.两种输精管结扎闭塞技术的有效性及相关并发症
J Urol. 2002 Dec;168(6):2495-8; discussion 2498. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64176-6.
8
Vasectomy occlusion technique combining thermal cautery and fascial interposition.输精管结扎术联合热凝和筋膜间置技术。
Int Braz J Urol. 2011 Sep-Oct;37(5):630-5. doi: 10.1590/s1677-55382011000500010.
9
Strengthening vasectomy services in Rwanda: introduction of thermal cautery with fascial interposition.加强卢旺达的输精管绝育服务:引入热烧灼与筋膜间置。
Contraception. 2013 Mar;87(3):375-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.019. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
10
Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: A prospective descriptive study.输精管结扎和切除联合筋膜间置术失败的风险:一项前瞻性描述性研究。
Contraception. 2020 May;101(5):342-349. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.02.001. Epub 2020 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Occlusive effectiveness of open-ended no-scalpel vasectomy with mucosal cautery and fascial interposition: a descriptive study.开放式无刀输精管切除术联合黏膜烧灼及筋膜间置的闭塞效果:一项描述性研究
Asian J Androl. 2025 Sep 1;27(5):592-597. doi: 10.4103/aja202517. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
2
Comparing vasectomy techniques, recovery and complications: tips and tricks.输精管切除术技术、恢复情况及并发症的比较:技巧与窍门
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jan 31. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01018-5.
3
U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Re: How little is enough? The evidence for post-vasectomy testing.
J Urol. 2006 Feb;175(2):791-2; author reply 792. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00173-4.
2
How little is enough? The evidence for post-vasectomy testing.多少才足够?输精管切除术后检测的证据。
J Urol. 2005 Jul;174(1):29-36. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000161595.82642.fc.
3
Vasectomy surgical techniques in South and South East Asia.南亚和东南亚的输精管切除术手术技术。
BMC Urol. 2005 May 25;5:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-5-10.
美国 2024 年避孕方法选择实践推荐
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2024 Aug 8;73(3):1-77. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7303a1.
4
Application of single-cell RNA sequencing on human testicular samples: a comprehensive review.单细胞 RNA 测序在人类睾丸样本中的应用:全面综述。
Int J Biol Sci. 2023 Apr 9;19(7):2167-2197. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.82191. eCollection 2023.
5
Effects of castration and sterilization on baseline and response levels of cortisol-A case study in male guinea pigs.去势和绝育对皮质醇基线水平及反应水平的影响——雄性豚鼠的一项案例研究
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Jan 6;9:1093157. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1093157. eCollection 2022.
6
[Vasectomy : Current information].[输精管切除术:当前信息]
Urologe A. 2021 Apr;60(4):523-532. doi: 10.1007/s00120-021-01494-9. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
7
Paternity seven years after a negative post-vasectomy semen analysis: a case report.输精管绝育术后 7 年的亲权鉴定:1 例报告。
J Med Case Rep. 2020 Apr 22;14(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13256-020-02374-0.
8
Postvasectomy Scrotal Pain and Hematospermia, a Possible Harbinger for Vasectomy Failure and Recanalization: A Case Report.输精管切除术后阴囊疼痛和血精:输精管切除失败和再通的可能预兆——病例报告
Perm J. 2019;24. doi: 10.7812/TPP/19.068. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
9
Unilateral absence of vas deferens: prevalence among 23.013 men seeking vasectomy.单侧输精管缺如:23013名寻求输精管结扎术男性中的患病率。
Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Sep-Oct;42(5):1010-1017. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0717.
10
Prospective comparison of ligation and bipolar cautery technique in non-scalpel vasectomy.非手术刀输精管结扎术中结扎术与双极电凝技术的前瞻性比较。
Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Nov-Dec;41(6):1172-7. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0356.
4
Delayed vasectomy success in men with a first postvasectomy semen analysis showing motile sperm.首次输精管切除术后精液分析显示有活动精子的男性输精管切除术后延迟成功情况。
Fertil Steril. 2005 May;83(5):1435-41. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.10.050.
5
The diagnosis of azoospermia depends on the force of centrifugation.无精子症的诊断取决于离心力。
Fertil Steril. 2005 Apr;83(4):920-2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.09.028.
6
A comparison of vas occlusion techniques: cautery more effective than ligation and excision with fascial interposition.血管闭塞技术的比较:电烙术比结扎术及带筋膜间置的切除术更有效。
BMC Urol. 2004 Oct 27;4(1):12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-4-12.
7
Effectiveness of vasectomy using cautery.烧灼法输精管切除术的有效性。
BMC Urol. 2004 Jul 19;4:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-4-10.
8
Vasectomy surgical techniques: a systematic review.输精管切除术手术技术:一项系统评价。
BMC Med. 2004 May 24;2:21. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-2-21.
9
Vasectomy by ligation and excision, with or without fascial interposition: a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN77781689].输精管结扎切除术,伴或不伴筋膜置入:一项随机对照试验[国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN77781689]
BMC Med. 2004 Mar 31;2:6. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-2-6.
10
The acceptability, efficacy and safety of quinacrine non-surgical sterilization (QS), tubectomy and vasectomy in 5 provinces in the Red River Delta, Vietnam: a follow-up of 15,190 cases.越南红河三角洲5个省份中奎纳克林非手术绝育术(QS)、输卵管切除术和输精管切除术的可接受性、有效性及安全性:15190例病例的随访
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003 Oct;83 Suppl 2:S77-85. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(03)90094-4.