Schouten B W V, Bosch J L H R, Bernsen R M D, Blanker M H, Thomas S, Bohnen A M
General Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Impot Res. 2005 Jan-Feb;17(1):58-62. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901264.
This study aims to describe the incidence rate of erectile dysfunction (ED) in older men in the Netherlands according to three definitions. The influence of the duration of follow-up on the incidence rate is also explored. In a large community-based follow-up study, 1661 men aged 50-75 y completed the International Continence Society sex questionnaire and a question on sexual activity, at baseline and at a mean of 2.1 and 4.2 y of follow-up. We defined 'ED' as a report of erections with 'reduced rigidity' or worse; 'Significant_ED' as 'severely reduced rigidity' or 'no erections'; and 'Clinically_Relevant_ED' as either 'ED' reported as 'quite a problem' or 'a serious problem', or 'Significant_ED' reported as at least 'a bit of a problem'. Incidence rates of ED status were calculated in those men who completed at least one period of follow-up and were not diagnosed with prostate cancer (n = 1604). For 'ED' the incidence rate (cases per 1000 person-years) is 99 and ranges over the 10-y age groups from 77 (50-59 y) to 205 (70-78 y); for 'Significant_ED' these rates were 33, 21, and 97, respectively and for 'Clinically_Relevant_ED' 28, 25, and 39, respectively. In general, incidence rates should not vary with the duration of follow-up. However, for 'ED' the 4.2 y incidence rate is about 69% of the 2.1 y incidence rate. This study presents incidence rates, for the general population, as well as based on a definition of ED that takes concern/bother into account. 'Clinically_Relevant_ED' has a lower increase in incidence with increasing age than other definitions that do not take concern/bother into account. The phenomenon of lower incidence rates with longer duration of follow-up may account for the differences in reported incidence rates between different studies. The effects of differences related to the duration of follow-up should be taken into consideration in future incidence reports.
本研究旨在根据三种定义描述荷兰老年男性勃起功能障碍(ED)的发病率。同时还探讨了随访时间对发病率的影响。在一项基于社区的大型随访研究中,1661名年龄在50 - 75岁的男性在基线时以及平均随访2.1年和4.2年时完成了国际尿失禁学会性问卷和一项关于性活动的问题。我们将“ED”定义为报告勃起硬度“降低”或更差;“严重ED”定义为“严重降低硬度”或“无勃起”;“临床相关ED”定义为报告为“相当大的问题”或“严重问题”的“ED”,或报告为至少“有点问题”的“严重ED”。在至少完成一个随访期且未被诊断出前列腺癌的男性(n = 1604)中计算ED状态的发病率。对于“ED”,发病率(每1000人年的病例数)为99,在10岁年龄组中的范围从77(50 - 59岁)到205(70 - 78岁);对于“严重ED”,这些发病率分别为33、21和97,对于“临床相关ED”分别为28、25和39。一般来说,发病率不应随随访时间而变化。然而,对于“ED”,4.2年的发病率约为2.1年发病率的69%。本研究给出了一般人群的发病率,以及基于考虑到关注/困扰因素的ED定义的发病率。与不考虑关注/困扰因素的其他定义相比,“临床相关ED”随年龄增长的发病率增幅较低。随访时间较长时发病率较低的现象可能解释了不同研究报告的发病率差异。在未来的发病率报告中应考虑与随访时间相关的差异影响。