• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衡量生物多样性状况的全球趋势:鸟类红色名录指数

Measuring global trends in the status of biodiversity: red list indices for birds.

作者信息

Butchart Stuart H M, Stattersfield Alison J, Bennun Leon A, Shutes Sue M, Akçakaya H Resit, Baillie Jonathan E M, Stuart Simon N, Hilton-Taylor Craig, Mace Georgina M

机构信息

BirdLife International, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS Biol. 2004 Dec;2(12):e383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020383. Epub 2004 Oct 26.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020383
PMID:15510230
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC524254/
Abstract

The rapid destruction of the planet's biodiversity has prompted the nations of the world to set a target of achieving a significant reduction in the rate of loss of biodiversity by 2010. However, we do not yet have an adequate way of monitoring progress towards achieving this target. Here we present a method for producing indices based on the IUCN Red List to chart the overall threat status (projected relative extinction risk) of all the world's bird species from 1988 to 2004. Red List Indices (RLIs) are based on the number of species in each Red List category, and on the number changing categories between assessments as a result of genuine improvement or deterioration in status. The RLI for all bird species shows that their overall threat status has continued to deteriorate since 1988. Disaggregated indices show that deteriorations have occurred worldwide and in all major ecosystems, but with particularly steep declines in the indices for Indo-Malayan birds (driven by intensifying deforestation of the Sundaic lowlands) and for albatrosses and petrels (driven by incidental mortality in commercial longline fisheries). RLIs complement indicators based on species population trends and habitat extent for quantifying global trends in the status of biodiversity. Their main weaknesses are that the resolution of status changes is fairly coarse and that delays may occur before some status changes are detected. Their greatest strength is that they are based on information from nearly all species in a taxonomic group worldwide, rather than a potentially biased subset. At present, suitable data are only available for birds, but indices for other taxonomic groups are in development, as is a sampled index based on a stratified sample from all major taxonomic groups.

摘要

地球生物多样性的迅速破坏促使世界各国设定了一个目标,即到2010年大幅降低生物多样性丧失的速度。然而,我们目前还没有一种适当的方法来监测在实现这一目标方面取得的进展。在此,我们提出一种基于世界自然保护联盟(IUCN)红色名录编制指数的方法,以描绘1988年至2004年期间世界所有鸟类物种的总体受威胁状况(预计的相对灭绝风险)。红色名录指数(RLIs)基于每个红色名录类别中的物种数量,以及由于物种状况真正改善或恶化而在评估之间改变类别的物种数量。所有鸟类物种的红色名录指数表明,自1988年以来它们的总体受威胁状况持续恶化。分类指数显示,全球范围内以及所有主要生态系统中都出现了恶化情况,但印度-马来亚地区鸟类(受巽他低地森林砍伐加剧的驱动)以及信天翁和海燕(受商业延绳钓渔业中的意外死亡驱动)的指数下降尤为显著。红色名录指数补充了基于物种种群趋势和栖息地范围的指标,用于量化生物多样性状况的全球趋势。它们的主要弱点是,状况变化的分辨率相当粗略,而且在检测到某些状况变化之前可能会出现延迟。它们最大的优势在于,它们基于全球一个分类群中几乎所有物种的信息,而不是一个可能有偏差的子集。目前,仅鸟类有合适的数据,但其他分类群的指数正在编制中,基于所有主要分类群分层样本的抽样指数也在编制中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b36b/524254/3e553fa7498b/pbio.0020383.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b36b/524254/9863eb044a6a/pbio.0020383.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b36b/524254/1e37e378ba56/pbio.0020383.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b36b/524254/7ffca1bcdb59/pbio.0020383.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b36b/524254/6fd487832fa2/pbio.0020383.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b36b/524254/85f61d46b452/pbio.0020383.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b36b/524254/346ad0759069/pbio.0020383.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b36b/524254/3e553fa7498b/pbio.0020383.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b36b/524254/9863eb044a6a/pbio.0020383.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b36b/524254/1e37e378ba56/pbio.0020383.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b36b/524254/7ffca1bcdb59/pbio.0020383.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b36b/524254/6fd487832fa2/pbio.0020383.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b36b/524254/85f61d46b452/pbio.0020383.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b36b/524254/346ad0759069/pbio.0020383.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b36b/524254/3e553fa7498b/pbio.0020383.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring global trends in the status of biodiversity: red list indices for birds.衡量生物多样性状况的全球趋势:鸟类红色名录指数
PLoS Biol. 2004 Dec;2(12):e383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020383. Epub 2004 Oct 26.
2
Using Red List Indices to measure progress towards the 2010 target and beyond.使用红色名录指数衡量实现2010年目标及后续目标的进展情况。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 28;360(1454):255-68. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1583.
3
Tracking extinction risk trends and patterns in a mega-diverse country: A Red List Index for birds in Colombia.追踪一个生物多样性大国的灭绝风险趋势和模式:哥伦比亚鸟类红色名录指数。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 27;15(1):e0227381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227381. eCollection 2020.
4
Application of the Red List Index for conservation assessment of Spanish vascular plants.红色名录指数在西班牙维管植物保护评估中的应用。
Conserv Biol. 2015 Jun;29(3):910-9. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12437. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
5
Improvements to the Red List Index.红色名录指数的改进。
PLoS One. 2007 Jan 3;2(1):e140. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000140.
6
Developing indicators for European birds.制定欧洲鸟类的指标。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 28;360(1454):269-88. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1602.
7
More losers than winners: investigating Anthropocene defaunation through the diversity of population trends.更多的失败者而非成功者:通过种群趋势多样性调查人类世的物种灭绝。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2023 Oct;98(5):1732-1748. doi: 10.1111/brv.12974. Epub 2023 May 15.
8
Application of the Red-List Index at a national level for multiple species groups.在国家层面上应用红色名录指数对多个物种组。
Conserv Biol. 2013 Apr;27(2):398-406. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12016. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
9
Rates of movement of threatened bird species between IUCN red list categories and toward extinction.受威胁鸟类物种在世界自然保护联盟红色名录类别之间的变动率以及走向灭绝的情况。
Conserv Biol. 2008 Apr;22(2):417-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00905.x.
10
Scientific foundations for an IUCN Red List of ecosystems.生态系统 IUCN 红色名录的科学基础。
PLoS One. 2013 May 8;8(5):e62111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062111. Print 2013.

引用本文的文献

1
Seabird strandings on the Brazilian coast: What influences spatial and temporal patterns?巴西海岸的海鸟搁浅:是什么影响了时空模式?
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 16;20(4):e0317335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317335. eCollection 2025.
2
Past conservation efforts reveal which actions lead to positive outcomes for species.过去的保护工作揭示了哪些行动能为物种带来积极成果。
PLoS Biol. 2025 Mar 18;23(3):e3003051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003051. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Measuring trends in extinction risk: a review of two decades of development and application of the Red List Index.

本文引用的文献

1
Anecdotes and the shifting baseline syndrome of fisheries.轶事与渔业的变动基准综合征。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1995 Oct;10(10):430. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)89171-5.
2
Developing indicators for European birds.制定欧洲鸟类的指标。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 28;360(1454):269-88. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1602.
3
Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines.全球两栖动物数量下降的定量证据。
衡量灭绝风险趋势:对《红色名录指数》二十年发展与应用的综述
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Jan 9;380(1917):20230206. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0206.
4
Bending the curve of biodiversity loss requires a 'satnav' for nature.扭转生物多样性丧失的趋势需要一个大自然的“卫星导航”。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Jan 9;380(1917):20230210. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0210.
5
Measuring genetic diversity across populations.测量不同人群间的遗传多样性。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Dec 4;20(12):e1012651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012651. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Understanding and achieving species elements in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.理解并实现《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》中的物种要素。
Bioscience. 2024 Aug 8;74(9):614-623. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biae065. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
Database of European vascular plants red lists as a contribution to more coherent plant conservation.欧洲维管植物红色名录数据库,为更一致的植物保护做出贡献。
Sci Data. 2024 Oct 16;11(1):1138. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03963-0.
8
Impact of sustainable energy, fossil fuels and green finance on ecosystem: Evidence from China.可持续能源、化石燃料与绿色金融对生态系统的影响:来自中国的证据。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 22;10(18):e36712. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36712. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.
9
A comprehensive evaluation of flowering plant diversity and conservation priority for national park planning in China.中国国家公园规划中开花植物多样性及保护优先级的综合评估
Fundam Res. 2022 Aug 24;3(6):939-950. doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2022.08.008. eCollection 2023 Nov.
10
Global assessment of marine plastic exposure risk for oceanic birds.海洋鸟类面临的海洋塑料暴露风险的全球评估。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jul 4;14(1):3665. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38900-z.
Nature. 2000 Apr 13;404(6779):752-5. doi: 10.1038/35008052.