• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衡量灭绝风险趋势:对《红色名录指数》二十年发展与应用的综述

Measuring trends in extinction risk: a review of two decades of development and application of the Red List Index.

作者信息

Butchart Stuart H M, Akçakaya H Resit, Berryman Alex J, Brooks Thomas M, Burfield Ian J, Chanson Janice, Dias Maria P, Donaldson John S, Hermes Claudia, Hilton-Taylor Craig, Hoffmann Mike, Luedtke Jennifer A, Martin Rob, McDougall Amy, Neam Kelsey, Polidoro Beth, Raimondo Domitilla, Rodrigues Ana S L, Rondinini Carlo, Rutherford Claire, Scott Tom, Simkins Ashley T, Stuart Simon N, Vine Jemma

机构信息

BirdLife International, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK.

Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Jan 9;380(1917):20230206. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0206.

DOI:10.1098/rstb.2023.0206
PMID:39780598
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11712279/
Abstract

The Red List Index (RLI) is an indicator of the average extinction risk of groups of species and reflects trends in this through time. It is calculated from the number of species in each category on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, with trends influenced by the number moving between categories when reassessed owing to genuine improvement or deterioration in status. The global RLI is aggregated across multiple taxonomic groups and can be disaggregated to show trends for subsets of species (e.g. migratory species), or driven by particular factors (e.g. international trade). National RLIs have been generated through either repeated assessments of national extinction risk in each country or through disaggregating the global index and weighting each species by the proportion of its range in each country. The RLI has achieved wide policy uptake, including by the Convention on Biological Diversity and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Future priorities include expanding its taxonomic coverage, applying the RLI to the goals and targets of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, incorporating uncertainty in the underlying Red List assessments, integrating into national RLIs the impact of a country on species' extinction risk abroad, and improving analysis of the factors driving trends.This article is part of the discussion theme issue 'Bending the curve towards nature recovery: building on Georgina Mace's legacy for a biodiverse future'.

摘要

红色名录指数(RLI)是物种群体平均灭绝风险的一个指标,并反映其随时间的变化趋势。它根据国际自然保护联盟濒危物种红色名录中每个类别的物种数量计算得出,其趋势受到因物种状况真正改善或恶化而在重新评估时类别变动数量的影响。全球RLI是跨多个分类群汇总得出的,并且可以细分以显示物种子集(如迁徙物种)的趋势,或由特定因素(如国际贸易)驱动的趋势。各国的RLI是通过对每个国家的国家灭绝风险进行反复评估,或通过细分全球指数并按每个物种在每个国家的分布比例对其进行加权计算得出的。RLI已在广泛的政策中得到采用,包括《生物多样性公约》和联合国可持续发展目标。未来的优先事项包括扩大其分类覆盖范围,将RLI应用于《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》的目标和指标,纳入基础红色名录评估中的不确定性,将一个国家对国外物种灭绝风险的影响纳入国家RLI,并改进对驱动趋势因素的分析。本文是讨论主题“朝着自然恢复弯曲曲线:基于乔治娜·梅斯的遗产迈向生物多样的未来”的一部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71a4/11712279/09a4229616b7/rstb.2023.0206.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71a4/11712279/a62a047069c8/rstb.2023.0206.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71a4/11712279/09a4229616b7/rstb.2023.0206.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71a4/11712279/a62a047069c8/rstb.2023.0206.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71a4/11712279/09a4229616b7/rstb.2023.0206.f002.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring trends in extinction risk: a review of two decades of development and application of the Red List Index.衡量灭绝风险趋势:对《红色名录指数》二十年发展与应用的综述
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Jan 9;380(1917):20230206. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0206.
2
Application of the Red-List Index at a national level for multiple species groups.在国家层面上应用红色名录指数对多个物种组。
Conserv Biol. 2013 Apr;27(2):398-406. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12016. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
3
Application of the Red List Index for conservation assessment of Spanish vascular plants.红色名录指数在西班牙维管植物保护评估中的应用。
Conserv Biol. 2015 Jun;29(3):910-9. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12437. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
4
Using Red List Indices to measure progress towards the 2010 target and beyond.使用红色名录指数衡量实现2010年目标及后续目标的进展情况。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 28;360(1454):255-68. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1583.
5
Genetic diversity and IUCN Red List status.遗传多样性与世界自然保护联盟濒危物种红色名录状况。
Conserv Biol. 2023 Aug;37(4):e14064. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14064. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
6
A framework for evaluating the impact of the IUCN Red List of threatened species.评估 IUCN 濒危物种红色名录影响的框架。
Conserv Biol. 2020 Jun;34(3):632-643. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13454. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
7
Using comparative extinction risk analysis to prioritize the IUCN Red List reassessments of amphibians.利用比较灭绝风险分析对 世界自然保护联盟濒危物种红色名录 中的两栖动物重新评估进行优先级排序。
Conserv Biol. 2024 Dec;38(6):e14316. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14316. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
8
Modelling the probability of meeting IUCN Red List criteria to support reassessments.建立模型以预测满足 IUCN 红色名录标准的概率,以支持重新评估。
Glob Chang Biol. 2024 Jan;30(1):e17119. doi: 10.1111/gcb.17119.
9
Measuring global trends in the status of biodiversity: red list indices for birds.衡量生物多样性状况的全球趋势:鸟类红色名录指数
PLoS Biol. 2004 Dec;2(12):e383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020383. Epub 2004 Oct 26.
10
The utility of the Living Planet Index as a policy tool and for measuring nature recovery.《地球生命力指数》作为政策工具及衡量自然恢复情况的效用。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Jan 9;380(1917):20230207. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0207.

引用本文的文献

1
Nature positive rhetoric, risk and reality: sector-scale political ecology at CBD COP16.自然积极言辞、风险与现实:《生物多样性公约》缔约方大会第十六次会议上的部门尺度政治生态学
NPJ Biodivers. 2025 Apr 23;4(1):14. doi: 10.1038/s44185-025-00087-5.
2
How should we bend the curve of biodiversity loss to build a just and sustainable future?我们应如何扭转生物多样性丧失的趋势,以建设一个公正且可持续的未来?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Jan 9;380(1917):20230205. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0205.
3
Accounting for functionality in the identification of global conservation priorities: promises and pitfalls.

本文引用的文献

1
Metrics for quantifying how much different threats contribute to red lists of species and ecosystems.用于量化不同威胁对物种和生态系统红色名录贡献程度的指标。
Conserv Biol. 2023 Oct;37(5):e14105. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14105. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
2
Seventy years of tunas, billfishes, and sharks as sentinels of global ocean health.七十年来,金枪鱼、旗鱼和鲨鱼作为全球海洋健康的哨兵。
Science. 2022 Nov 11;378(6620):eabj0211. doi: 10.1126/science.abj0211.
3
A global reptile assessment highlights shared conservation needs of tetrapods.一项全球爬行动物评估突出了四足动物共同的保护需求。
在确定全球保护重点时考虑功能:前景与困境
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Jan 9;380(1917):20230209. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0209.
Nature. 2022 May;605(7909):285-290. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04664-7. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
4
Testing a global standard for quantifying species recovery and assessing conservation impact.测试一种量化物种恢复和评估保护影响的全球标准。
Conserv Biol. 2021 Dec;35(6):1833-1849. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13756. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
5
Digital data sources and methods for conservation culturomics.用于保护文化组学的数字数据源和方法。
Conserv Biol. 2021 Apr;35(2):398-411. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13706. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
6
Tracking extinction risk trends and patterns in a mega-diverse country: A Red List Index for birds in Colombia.追踪一个生物多样性大国的灭绝风险趋势和模式:哥伦比亚鸟类红色名录指数。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 27;15(1):e0227381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227381. eCollection 2020.
7
Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change.人类活动导致地球生命普遍衰退,这表明我们需要进行变革性的改变。
Science. 2019 Dec 13;366(6471). doi: 10.1126/science.aax3100.
8
Quantifying species recovery and conservation success to develop an IUCN Green List of Species.量化物种恢复和保护成效,以制定 IUCN 物种红色名录。
Conserv Biol. 2018 Oct;32(5):1128-1138. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13112. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
9
Assessing the Cost of Global Biodiversity and Conservation Knowledge.评估全球生物多样性及保护知识的成本
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 16;11(8):e0160640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160640. eCollection 2016.
10
Clarifying misconceptions of extinction risk assessment with the IUCN Red List.借助世界自然保护联盟红色名录澄清灭绝风险评估的误解。
Biol Lett. 2016 Apr;12(4). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0843.