Légaré Jean-Francois, Hirsch Gregory
Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Can J Cardiol. 2006 Nov;22(13):1107-10. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(06)70945-x.
The cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has allowed the establishment of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) to be a safe and effective treatment for patients with ischemic heart disease. However, the concern that CPB may be responsible for CABG-related morbidity has been raised, and it has been suggested that CABG itself would be safer without CPB. The development of commercially available cardiac stabilization devices resulted in several large, nonrandomized retrospective case series. The studies demonstrated that CABG can be performed safely without CPB (off-pump surgery), and suggested that there are benefits compared with conventional CABG. However, the randomized controlled studies published to date have been, as a whole, unable to conclusively demonstrate advantages of off-pump CABG. The results of these randomized studies are likely responsible for the failure of off-pump CABG to become established as the standard of care.
体外循环(CPB)使冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)成为治疗缺血性心脏病患者的一种安全有效的方法。然而,有人提出CPB可能是CABG相关发病率的原因,并且有人认为没有CPB的情况下CABG本身会更安全。市售心脏稳定装置的出现产生了几个大型的、非随机的回顾性病例系列。这些研究表明,不使用CPB(非体外循环手术)也可以安全地进行CABG,并且表明与传统CABG相比有一些益处。然而,迄今为止发表的随机对照研究总体上未能确凿地证明非体外循环CABG的优势。这些随机研究的结果可能是导致非体外循环CABG未能成为护理标准的原因。