• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Low values on 50 gram glucose challenge test or oral 100 gram glucose tolerance test are associated with good perinatal outcome.

作者信息

Lurie S, Levy R, Weiss R, Boultin G, Hagay Z J

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Sep;18(5):451-4. doi: 10.1080/01443619866778.

DOI:10.1080/01443619866778
PMID:15512142
Abstract

We set out to reevaluate the hypothesis that high normal (negative) results of 50 g oral glucose challenge test or high normal glucose level on 100 g oral glucose tolerance test are associated with complications of pregnancy and delivery. This was a prospective study involving 735 nondiabetic women. The first group (n=352) was made up of pregnant women with normal 50 g oral glucose challenge test without previous history of diabetes mellitus or gestational diabetes. The second group (n=383) was made up of pregnant women without previous history of diabetes mellitus or gestational diabetes with an abnormal 50 g oral glucose challenge test and with normal 100 g oral glucose tolerance test and not more than one previous delivery. In nondiabetic women, we demonstrated a positive correlation between high normal 50 g glucose challenge test values and the incidence of preeclampsia, caesarean section rate, macrosomia, neonatal hyperlipidaemia and minor congenital abnormalities. We failed to confirm any relationship to any pregnancy complication in pregnant women with 2-hour glucose levels in the range 6.7-9.1 mmol/l on the 100 g oral glucose tolerance test. We have demonstrated a positive relationship between the incidence of premature rupture of membranes and 1-hour glucose level, caesarean section rate and maternal 1-hour glucose level or 1-hour glucose level minus fasting glucose level of 4.2 mmol/l, instrumental delivery rate and maternal 3-hour glucose level, incidence of neonatal macrosomia and 1-hour glucose level, and incidence of neonatal hyperlipidaemia and at least one high but normal glucose level on the 100 g oral glucose tolerance test. With regard to pregnancy and delivery complications there were no significant difference if the high normal value is on the 50 g glucose challenge test or on the 100 g oral glucose tolerance test. It is concluded that one high normal 100 g oral glucose tolerance test or high normal 50 g glucose challenge test are associated with adverse pregnancy and delivery outcome. Nondiabetic women with 50 g glucose challenge test value of 6.1 mmol/l and/or 100 g oral glucose tolerance test values of 5 mmol/l have a favourable pregnancy and delivery outcome.

摘要

相似文献

1
Low values on 50 gram glucose challenge test or oral 100 gram glucose tolerance test are associated with good perinatal outcome.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Sep;18(5):451-4. doi: 10.1080/01443619866778.
2
Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnant females.孕妇妊娠糖尿病的筛查
Saudi Med J. 2000 Feb;21(2):155-60.
3
Characteristics of patients with abnormal glucose challenge test and normal oral glucose tolerance test results: comparison with normal and gestational diabetic patients.葡萄糖耐量试验异常但口服葡萄糖耐量试验结果正常的患者特征:与正常及妊娠期糖尿病患者的比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 May;194(5):e42-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.11.031. Epub 2006 Apr 21.
4
[Correlation between amniotic fluid glucose concentration and amniotic fluid volume and neonatal birth weight in pregnancy complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus].妊娠合并妊娠期糖尿病时羊水葡萄糖浓度与羊水量及新生儿出生体重的相关性
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Nov;41(11):724-8.
5
Maternal triglyceride levels and newborn weight in pregnant women with normal glucose tolerance.葡萄糖耐量正常孕妇的母体甘油三酯水平与新生儿体重
Diabet Med. 2005 Jan;22(1):21-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01336.x.
6
Oral glucose tolerance testing at gestational weeks < or =16 could predict or exclude subsequent gestational diabetes mellitus during the current pregnancy in high risk group.孕16周及以内进行口服葡萄糖耐量试验,可预测或排除高危组孕妇当前孕期后续发生的妊娠期糖尿病。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005 Jul 1;121(1):51-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.11.006.
7
The glucose challenge test for screening gestational diabetes in pregnant women with no risk factors.对无危险因素的孕妇进行葡萄糖耐量试验以筛查妊娠期糖尿病。
Singapore Med J. 2001 Nov;42(11):517-21.
8
Using the 100-g oral glucose tolerance test to predict fetal and maternal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus.使用100克口服葡萄糖耐量试验预测妊娠期糖尿病女性的母婴结局。
Chang Gung Med J. 2009 May-Jun;32(3):283-9.
9
Analysis of oral glucose tolerance test in pregnant women with abnormal glucose metabolism.糖代谢异常孕妇口服葡萄糖耐量试验分析
Chin Med J (Engl). 2005 Jun 20;118(12):995-9.
10
Impaired glucose tolerance associated with adverse pregnancy outcome: a population-based study in southern Sweden.糖耐量受损与不良妊娠结局的关系:瑞典南部的一项基于人群的研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jan;184(2):77-83. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.108085.

引用本文的文献

1
Gestational reactive hypoglycaemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.妊娠期反应性低血糖与不良妊娠结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Aug 26;25(1):888. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-08016-x.
2
Small-for-gestational age and its association with maternal blood glucose, body mass index and stature: a perinatal cohort study among Chinese women.小于胎龄儿及其与孕妇血糖、体重指数和身高的关联:一项中国女性围产期队列研究
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 15;6(9):e010984. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010984.
3
Association between Prenatal One-Hour Glucose Challenge Test Values and Delivery Mode in Nondiabetic, Pregnant Black Women.
非糖尿病黑人孕妇产前一小时葡萄糖耐量试验值与分娩方式之间的关联
J Pregnancy. 2015;2015:835613. doi: 10.1155/2015/835613. Epub 2015 May 25.
4
Utility of superior mesenteric artery Doppler and maternal pancreatic size for predicting gestational diabetes mellitus.肠系膜上动脉多普勒检查及母体胰腺大小对预测妊娠期糖尿病的作用
Ir J Med Sci. 2015 Jun;184(2):499-503. doi: 10.1007/s11845-014-1155-7. Epub 2014 Jun 8.