• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The precautionary principle and the regulation of U.S. food and drug safety.

作者信息

Soule Ed

机构信息

The McDonough School of Business at Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA.

出版信息

J Med Philos. 2004 Jun;29(3):333-50. doi: 10.1080/03605310490500536.

DOI:10.1080/03605310490500536
PMID:15512976
Abstract

This article probes the advisability of regulating U.S. food and drug safety according to the precautionary principle. To do so, a precautionary regulatory regime is formulated on the basis of the beliefs that motivate most proponents of this initiative. That hypothetical regime is critically analyzed on the basis of an actual instantiation of a similarly stylized initiative. It will be argued that the precautionary principle entails regulatory constraints that are apt to violate basis tenets of political legitimacy. The modifications that would change this finding would also change precautionary regulation to the point that it would be indistinguishable from orthodox safety protocols. It is concluded on the basis of its impoverished content that the precautionary principle should not be taken seriously as a formal approach to the regulation of U.S. food and drug safety.

摘要

相似文献

1
The precautionary principle and the regulation of U.S. food and drug safety.
J Med Philos. 2004 Jun;29(3):333-50. doi: 10.1080/03605310490500536.
2
FDA on transgenic animals--a dog's breakfast?美国食品药品监督管理局对转基因动物的监管——一团糟?
Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Feb;26(2):159-60. doi: 10.1038/nbt0208-159.
3
Animal cloning and the FDA--the risk assessment paradigm under public scrutiny.动物克隆与美国食品药品监督管理局——处于公众审视之下的风险评估模式
Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Jan;25(1):39-43. doi: 10.1038/nbt0107-39.
4
Without a trace: how a lack of U.S. domestic LMO regulations is undermining international control.无影无踪:美国国内对改性活生物体缺乏监管如何破坏国际管控。
Genewatch. 2005 May-Jun;18(3):3-5, 16.
5
RU-486: legal and policy issues confronting the Food and Drug Administration.RU-486:美国食品药品监督管理局面临的法律和政策问题。
J Leg Med. 1993 Jun;14(2):319-47. doi: 10.1080/01947649309510918.
6
[State surveillance and control of food quality and safety in USA].[美国食品质量与安全的国家监管与控制]
Vopr Pitan. 2003;72(2):22-7.
7
US animal biotech regulations "may not be adequate".美国动物生物技术法规“可能不够充分”。
Nat Biotechnol. 2002 Oct;20(10):959. doi: 10.1038/nbt1002-959.
8
Is the battle over genetically modified foods finally over?转基因食品之战终于结束了吗?
Biotechnol Adv. 2005 Mar;23(2):93-6. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2004.08.004.
9
Drug review "behind the curtain": a response to Professor Struve.幕后药物审查:对斯特鲁夫教授的回应
Cornell Law Rev. 2008 Jul;93(5):1075-90.
10
NAS issues mixed message on unintended effects of GM food.美国国家科学院就转基因食品的意外影响发布了矛盾的信息。
Nat Biotechnol. 2004 Sep;22(9):1062. doi: 10.1038/nbt0904-1062.

引用本文的文献

1
A precautionary approach to autonomous vehicles.对自动驾驶车辆采取预防措施。
AI Ethics. 2024 May;4(2):403-418. doi: 10.1007/s43681-023-00277-6. Epub 2023 Mar 27.