Suppr超能文献

对自动驾驶车辆采取预防措施。

A precautionary approach to autonomous vehicles.

作者信息

Resnik David B, Andrews Suzanne L

机构信息

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 111 TW Alexander Drive, Mail Drop E1-06, PO Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.

Master of Science in Bioethics Student, Columbia University, 203 Lewisohn Hall, 2970 Broadway, Mail Code 4119, New York, NY 10027-6902, USA.

出版信息

AI Ethics. 2024 May;4(2):403-418. doi: 10.1007/s43681-023-00277-6. Epub 2023 Mar 27.

Abstract

In this article, we defend an approach to autonomous vehicle ethics and policy based on the precautionary principle. We argue that a precautionary approach is warranted, given the significant scientific and moral uncertainties related to autonomous vehicles, especially higher-level ones. While higher-level autonomous vehicles may offer many important benefits to society, they also pose significant risks, which are not fully understood at this juncture. Risk management strategies traditionally used by government officials to make decisions about new technologies cannot be applied to higher-level autonomous vehicles because these strategies require accurate and reliable probability estimates concerning the outcomes of different policy options and extensive agreement about values, which are not currently available for autonomous vehicles. Although we describe our approach as precautionary, that does not mean that we are opposed to autonomous vehicle development and deployment, because autonomous vehicles offer benefits that should be pursued. The optimal approach to managing the risks of autonomous vehicles is to take reasonable precautions; that is, to adopt policies that attempt to deal with serious risks in a responsible way without depriving society of important benefits.

摘要

在本文中,我们捍卫一种基于预防原则的自动驾驶汽车伦理与政策方法。我们认为,鉴于与自动驾驶汽车,尤其是高级别自动驾驶汽车相关的重大科学和道德不确定性,采取预防措施是有必要的。虽然高级别自动驾驶汽车可能会给社会带来许多重要益处,但它们也带来了重大风险,而目前人们对此尚未完全了解。政府官员传统上用于对新技术做出决策的风险管理策略无法应用于高级别自动驾驶汽车,因为这些策略需要对不同政策选项的结果进行准确可靠的概率估计以及对价值观达成广泛共识,而目前自动驾驶汽车尚不具备这些条件。尽管我们将我们的方法描述为预防性的,但这并不意味着我们反对自动驾驶汽车的开发和部署,因为自动驾驶汽车带来的益处值得追求。管理自动驾驶汽车风险的最佳方法是采取合理的预防措施;也就是说,采用旨在以负责任的方式应对严重风险同时又不剥夺社会重要益处的政策。

相似文献

1
A precautionary approach to autonomous vehicles.
AI Ethics. 2024 May;4(2):403-418. doi: 10.1007/s43681-023-00277-6. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
2
Ethical Decision Making in Autonomous Vehicles: The AV Ethics Project.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Dec;26(6):3285-3312. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00272-8. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
4
[The precautionary principle: advantages and risks].
J Chir (Paris). 2001 Apr;138(2):68-80.
6
A visual approach towards forward collision warning for autonomous vehicles on Malaysian public roads.
F1000Res. 2021 Sep 16;10:928. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.72897.2. eCollection 2021.
7
Anticipating or Accommodating to Public Concern? Risk Amplification and the Politics of Precaution Reexamined.
Risk Anal. 2018 Sep;38(9):1802-1819. doi: 10.1111/risa.12997. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
8
Application of the precautionary principle by senior policy officials: results of a Canadian survey.
Risk Anal. 2006 Aug;26(4):981-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00793.x.
10
Research on the influence and mechanism of human-vehicle moral matching on trust in autonomous vehicles.
Front Psychol. 2023 May 30;14:1071872. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1071872. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
An Overview of Autonomous Vehicles Sensors and Their Vulnerability to Weather Conditions.
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Aug 10;21(16):5397. doi: 10.3390/s21165397.
2
A Deeper Look at Autonomous Vehicle Ethics: An Integrative Ethical Decision-Making Framework to Explain Moral Pluralism.
Front Robot AI. 2021 May 4;8:632394. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.632394. eCollection 2021.
3
Ethical Decision Making in Autonomous Vehicles: The AV Ethics Project.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Dec;26(6):3285-3312. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00272-8. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
4
Autonomous Vehicles and Public Health.
Annu Rev Public Health. 2020 Apr 2;41:329-345. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094035. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
5
Making Open Science Work for Science and Society.
Environ Health Perspect. 2019 Jul;127(7):75002. doi: 10.1289/EHP4808. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
6
Flynn effect and its reversal are both environmentally caused.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 26;115(26):6674-6678. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1718793115. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
8
Self-Driving Cars and Engineering Ethics: The Need for a System Level Analysis.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):383-398. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-0006-0. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
9
Public Health, Ethics, and Autonomous Vehicles.
Am J Public Health. 2017 Apr;107(4):532-537. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303628. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
10
The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles.
Science. 2016 Jun 24;352(6293):1573-6. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2654.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验