• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A precautionary approach to autonomous vehicles.对自动驾驶车辆采取预防措施。
AI Ethics. 2024 May;4(2):403-418. doi: 10.1007/s43681-023-00277-6. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
2
Ethical Decision Making in Autonomous Vehicles: The AV Ethics Project.自动驾驶汽车中的伦理决策:AV 伦理项目。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Dec;26(6):3285-3312. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00272-8. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
3
[Conclusions. The precautionary principle: its advantages and risks].[结论。预防原则:其优点与风险]
Bull Acad Natl Med. 2000;184(5):969-93.
4
[The precautionary principle: advantages and risks].[预防原则:优势与风险]
J Chir (Paris). 2001 Apr;138(2):68-80.
5
Quantifying the Impact of Deployments of Autonomous Vehicles and Intelligent Roads on Road Safety in China: A Country-Level Modeling Study.量化自动驾驶车辆和智能道路部署对中国道路安全的影响:一项国家级建模研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;20(5):4069. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054069.
6
A visual approach towards forward collision warning for autonomous vehicles on Malaysian public roads.面向马来西亚公共道路上自动驾驶汽车的前向碰撞预警的可视化方法。
F1000Res. 2021 Sep 16;10:928. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.72897.2. eCollection 2021.
7
Anticipating or Accommodating to Public Concern? Risk Amplification and the Politics of Precaution Reexamined.预期还是应对公众关切?风险放大与预防政策再审视。
Risk Anal. 2018 Sep;38(9):1802-1819. doi: 10.1111/risa.12997. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
8
Application of the precautionary principle by senior policy officials: results of a Canadian survey.高级政策官员对预防原则的应用:一项加拿大调查的结果
Risk Anal. 2006 Aug;26(4):981-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00793.x.
9
Humans, machines, and double standards? The moral evaluation of the actions of autonomous vehicles, anthropomorphized autonomous vehicles, and human drivers in road-accident dilemmas.人类、机器与双重标准?道路事故困境中自动驾驶汽车、拟人化自动驾驶汽车及人类驾驶员行为的道德评估
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 4;13:1052729. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1052729. eCollection 2022.
10
Research on the influence and mechanism of human-vehicle moral matching on trust in autonomous vehicles.人车道德匹配对自动驾驶汽车信任的影响及机制研究
Front Psychol. 2023 May 30;14:1071872. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1071872. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
"All things equal": ethical principles governing why autonomous vehicle experts change or retain their opinions in trolley problems-a qualitative study.“在其他条件相同的情况下”:关于自动驾驶汽车专家在电车难题中改变或保留其观点的伦理原则——一项定性研究
Front Robot AI. 2025 May 27;12:1544272. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1544272. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
An Overview of Autonomous Vehicles Sensors and Their Vulnerability to Weather Conditions.自动驾驶汽车传感器概述及其对天气条件的脆弱性。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Aug 10;21(16):5397. doi: 10.3390/s21165397.
2
A Deeper Look at Autonomous Vehicle Ethics: An Integrative Ethical Decision-Making Framework to Explain Moral Pluralism.深入探讨自动驾驶汽车伦理:一个解释道德多元主义的综合伦理决策框架。
Front Robot AI. 2021 May 4;8:632394. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.632394. eCollection 2021.
3
Ethical Decision Making in Autonomous Vehicles: The AV Ethics Project.自动驾驶汽车中的伦理决策:AV 伦理项目。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Dec;26(6):3285-3312. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00272-8. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
4
Autonomous Vehicles and Public Health.自动驾驶汽车与公共健康
Annu Rev Public Health. 2020 Apr 2;41:329-345. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094035. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
5
Making Open Science Work for Science and Society.推动开放科学造福科学和社会。
Environ Health Perspect. 2019 Jul;127(7):75002. doi: 10.1289/EHP4808. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
6
Flynn effect and its reversal are both environmentally caused.弗林效应及其逆转都是由环境引起的。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 26;115(26):6674-6678. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1718793115. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
7
Human Decisions in Moral Dilemmas are Largely Described by Utilitarianism: Virtual Car Driving Study Provides Guidelines for Autonomous Driving Vehicles.在道德困境中,人类的决策在很大程度上由功利主义描述:虚拟汽车驾驶研究为自动驾驶车辆提供了指导方针。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):399-418. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0020-x. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
8
Self-Driving Cars and Engineering Ethics: The Need for a System Level Analysis.自动驾驶汽车与工程伦理:需要系统层面的分析。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):383-398. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-0006-0. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
9
Public Health, Ethics, and Autonomous Vehicles.公共卫生、伦理与自动驾驶汽车
Am J Public Health. 2017 Apr;107(4):532-537. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303628. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
10
The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles.自动驾驶汽车的社会困境。
Science. 2016 Jun 24;352(6293):1573-6. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2654.

对自动驾驶车辆采取预防措施。

A precautionary approach to autonomous vehicles.

作者信息

Resnik David B, Andrews Suzanne L

机构信息

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 111 TW Alexander Drive, Mail Drop E1-06, PO Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.

Master of Science in Bioethics Student, Columbia University, 203 Lewisohn Hall, 2970 Broadway, Mail Code 4119, New York, NY 10027-6902, USA.

出版信息

AI Ethics. 2024 May;4(2):403-418. doi: 10.1007/s43681-023-00277-6. Epub 2023 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1007/s43681-023-00277-6
PMID:38770187
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11105117/
Abstract

In this article, we defend an approach to autonomous vehicle ethics and policy based on the precautionary principle. We argue that a precautionary approach is warranted, given the significant scientific and moral uncertainties related to autonomous vehicles, especially higher-level ones. While higher-level autonomous vehicles may offer many important benefits to society, they also pose significant risks, which are not fully understood at this juncture. Risk management strategies traditionally used by government officials to make decisions about new technologies cannot be applied to higher-level autonomous vehicles because these strategies require accurate and reliable probability estimates concerning the outcomes of different policy options and extensive agreement about values, which are not currently available for autonomous vehicles. Although we describe our approach as precautionary, that does not mean that we are opposed to autonomous vehicle development and deployment, because autonomous vehicles offer benefits that should be pursued. The optimal approach to managing the risks of autonomous vehicles is to take reasonable precautions; that is, to adopt policies that attempt to deal with serious risks in a responsible way without depriving society of important benefits.

摘要

在本文中,我们捍卫一种基于预防原则的自动驾驶汽车伦理与政策方法。我们认为,鉴于与自动驾驶汽车,尤其是高级别自动驾驶汽车相关的重大科学和道德不确定性,采取预防措施是有必要的。虽然高级别自动驾驶汽车可能会给社会带来许多重要益处,但它们也带来了重大风险,而目前人们对此尚未完全了解。政府官员传统上用于对新技术做出决策的风险管理策略无法应用于高级别自动驾驶汽车,因为这些策略需要对不同政策选项的结果进行准确可靠的概率估计以及对价值观达成广泛共识,而目前自动驾驶汽车尚不具备这些条件。尽管我们将我们的方法描述为预防性的,但这并不意味着我们反对自动驾驶汽车的开发和部署,因为自动驾驶汽车带来的益处值得追求。管理自动驾驶汽车风险的最佳方法是采取合理的预防措施;也就是说,采用旨在以负责任的方式应对严重风险同时又不剥夺社会重要益处的政策。