Haymond Shannon, Cariappa Rohit, Eby Charles S, Scott Mitchell G
Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Clin Chem. 2005 Feb;51(2):434-44. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.035154. Epub 2004 Oct 28.
This case conference reviews laboratory methods for assessing oxygenation status: arterial blood gases, pulse oximetry, and CO-oximetry. Caveats of these measurements are discussed in the context of two methemoglobinemia cases.
Case 1 is a woman who presented with increased shortness of breath, productive cough, chest pain, nausea, fever, and cyanosis. CO-oximetry indicated a carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) fraction of 24.9%. She was unresponsive to O(2) therapy, and no source of carbon monoxide could be noted. Case 2 is a man who presented with syncope, chest tightness, and signs of cyanosis. His arterial blood was dark brown, and CO-oximetry showed a methemoglobin (MetHb) fraction of 23%.
Oxygen saturation (So(2)) can be measured by three approaches that are often used interchangeably, although the measured systems are quite different. Pulse oximetry is a noninvasive, spectrophotometric method to determine arterial oxygen saturation (S(a)O(2)). CO-oximetry is a more complex and reliable method that measures the concentration of hemoglobin derivatives in the blood from which various quantities such as hemoglobin derivative fractions, total hemoglobin, and saturation are calculated. Blood gas instruments calculate the estimated O(2) saturation from empirical equations using pH and Po(2) values. In most patients, the results from these methods will be virtually identical, but in cases of increased dyshemoglobin fractions, including methemoglobinemia, it is crucial that the distinctions and limitations of these methods be understood.
So(2) calculated from pH and Po(2) should be interpreted with caution as the algorithms used assume normal O(2) affinity, normal 2,3-diphosphoglycerate concentrations, and no dyshemoglobins or hemoglobinopathies. CO-oximeter reports should include the dyshemoglobin fractions in addition to the oxyhemoglobin fraction. In cases of increased MetHb fraction, pulse oximeter values trend toward 85%, underestimating the actual oxygen saturation. Hemoglobin M variants may yield normal MetHb and increased COHb or sulfhemoglobin fractions measured by CO-oximetry.
本病例讨论会回顾了评估氧合状态的实验室方法:动脉血气分析、脉搏血氧饱和度测定和一氧化碳血氧测定法。在两例高铁血红蛋白血症病例的背景下讨论了这些测量方法的注意事项。
病例1是一名女性,表现为呼吸急促加重、咳痰、胸痛、恶心、发热和发绀。一氧化碳血氧测定法显示碳氧血红蛋白(COHb)分数为24.9%。她对氧疗无反应,且未发现一氧化碳来源。病例2是一名男性,表现为晕厥、胸闷和发绀体征。他的动脉血呈深棕色,一氧化碳血氧测定法显示高铁血红蛋白(MetHb)分数为23%。
氧饱和度(So₂)可以通过三种经常互换使用的方法进行测量,尽管测量系统有很大不同。脉搏血氧饱和度测定是一种用于确定动脉血氧饱和度(S(a)O₂)的非侵入性分光光度法。一氧化碳血氧测定法是一种更复杂且可靠的方法,它测量血液中血红蛋白衍生物的浓度,并据此计算诸如血红蛋白衍生物分数、总血红蛋白和饱和度等各种参数。血气分析仪使用pH值和氧分压(Po₂)值通过经验公式计算估计的氧饱和度。在大多数患者中,这些方法的结果几乎相同,但在高铁血红蛋白血症等血红蛋白异常分数增加的情况下,理解这些方法的区别和局限性至关重要。
根据pH值和Po₂计算得出的So₂应谨慎解读,因为所使用的算法假设氧亲和力正常、2,3-二磷酸甘油酸浓度正常,且不存在血红蛋白异常或血红蛋白病。一氧化碳血氧测定仪报告除了氧合血红蛋白分数外,还应包括血红蛋白异常分数。在高铁血红蛋白分数增加的情况下,脉搏血氧饱和度测定仪的值趋向于85%,低估了实际的氧饱和度。血红蛋白M变异体可能导致高铁血红蛋白正常,但一氧化碳血氧测定法测得的碳氧血红蛋白或硫化血红蛋白分数增加。