• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大一个大型城市人口中的创伤再发情况。

Trauma recidivism in a large urban canadian population.

作者信息

Caufeild J, Singhal A, Moulton R, Brenneman F, Redelmeier D, Baker A J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2004 Oct;57(4):872-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000135350.06670.60.

DOI:10.1097/01.ta.0000135350.06670.60
PMID:15514545
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prevention of trauma might be achieved by risk factor modification. Identification of such risk factors can be pursued by various means. Trauma recidivists may possess and highlight risk factors. Accordingly, trauma recidivists were analyzed as a method to elucidate trauma risk factors.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 13,057 trauma patients in Toronto was conducted. Forty-two recidivists were identified, and their first admission was compared with a control group of 84 non-recidivists.

RESULTS

The rate of trauma recidivism was 0.38% overall. Trauma recidivists were more likely to be from the inner city, male, homeless, suffering from chronic medical conditions. In addition, psychiatric conditions, an alcoholism history or any alcohol at the time of injury, intentionally injured, or engaged in criminal activity were also significantly more common in recidivists (p <0.05).

CONCLUSION

Risk factors for major trauma can be identified by analyzing recidivists in a large urban Canadian population.

摘要

背景

通过改变风险因素或许可以预防创伤。可通过多种方式来识别此类风险因素。创伤再发者可能拥有并凸显风险因素。因此,对创伤再发者进行分析作为一种阐明创伤风险因素的方法。

方法

对多伦多的13057名创伤患者进行了回顾性分析。识别出42名再发者,并将他们的首次入院情况与84名非再发者的对照组进行比较。

结果

总体创伤再发率为0.38%。创伤再发者更有可能来自市中心、男性、无家可归、患有慢性疾病。此外,精神疾病、酗酒史或受伤时饮酒、故意受伤或从事犯罪活动在再发者中也明显更为常见(p<0.05)。

结论

通过分析加拿大城市大量人群中的再发者可以识别出重大创伤的风险因素。

相似文献

1
Trauma recidivism in a large urban canadian population.加拿大一个大型城市人口中的创伤再发情况。
J Trauma. 2004 Oct;57(4):872-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000135350.06670.60.
2
Trauma recidivism in a Canadian province: a 14-year registry review.加拿大一个省份的创伤再发情况:一项为期14年的登记审查。
CJEM. 2019 Jul;21(4):473-476. doi: 10.1017/cem.2018.496. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
3
Trauma Recidivism Predicts Long-term Mortality: Missed Opportunities for Prevention (Retrospective Cohort Study).创伤再发预示长期死亡率:预防的错失机遇(回顾性队列研究)
Ann Surg. 2017 May;265(5):847-853. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001823.
4
Exploring trauma recidivism in an elderly cohort.探讨老年队列中的创伤再发。
J Surg Res. 2013 Sep;184(1):582-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.03.021. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
5
A novel prospective approach to evaluate trauma recidivism: the concept of the past trauma history.一种评估创伤再发的新前瞻性方法:过去创伤史的概念。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1):116-21. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829231b7.
6
Is Opioid Prescribing Driving Trauma Recidivism or Is Trauma Driving Opioid Use?是阿片类药物处方导致创伤再发,还是创伤导致阿片类药物使用?
Am Surg. 2019 Jun 1;85(6):567-571.
7
Violent trauma recidivism: Does all violence escalate?暴力创伤再犯:所有暴力行为都会升级吗?
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018 Dec;44(6):851-858. doi: 10.1007/s00068-017-0787-5. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
8
Pediatric trauma recidivism in an urban cohort.城市队列中的儿科创伤再入院率。
J Surg Res. 2013 Jun 15;182(2):326-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.12.007. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
9
Trauma recidivism is pervasive and is associated with mental and social health opportunities.创伤再发普遍存在,并与心理健康和社会机会相关。
Injury. 2023 Feb;54(2):519-524. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.11.002. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
10
Recidivism in an urban trauma center.城市创伤中心的再犯情况。
Arch Surg. 1992 Jun;127(6):668-70. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420060034006.

引用本文的文献

1
Trauma recidivism in England and Wales: an epidemiological study.英格兰和威尔士的创伤再发:一项流行病学研究。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 Jul 15;10(3):e001669. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001669. eCollection 2025.
2
Recidivism after orthopaedic trauma has diminished over time.骨科创伤后的再入院率随时间的推移而降低。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Aug;49(4):1891-1896. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02274-0. Epub 2023 May 10.
3
Trauma center risk conditions for blood alcohol-positive and alcohol misuse patients: a retrospective study.
血液酒精检测呈阳性及存在酒精滥用问题患者的创伤中心风险状况:一项回顾性研究。
Int J Burns Trauma. 2022 Aug 15;12(4):149-160. eCollection 2022.
4
Are we missing the mark? Relationships of psychosocial issues to outcomes after injury: A review of OTA annual meeting presentations.我们是否未达目标?心理社会问题与受伤后结局的关系:对骨与软组织创伤协会年会报告的综述
OTA Int. 2020 Apr 23;3(2):e070. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000070. eCollection 2020 Jun.
5
Implementing recovery resources in trauma care: impact and implications.在创伤护理中实施康复资源:影响与启示
OTA Int. 2019 Nov 22;2(4):e045. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000045. eCollection 2019 Dec.
6
Implementing psychosocial programming at a level 1 trauma center: results from a 5-year period.在一级创伤中心实施社会心理规划:五年期结果
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2020 Jan 21;5(1):e000363. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2019-000363. eCollection 2020.
7
A System Dynamics Model of Violent Trauma and the Role of Violence Intervention Programs.暴力创伤的系统动力学模型及暴力干预项目的作用。
J Surg Res. 2020 Mar;247:258-263. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.10.015. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
8
Burn recidivism: a 10-year retrospective study characterizing patients with repeated burn injuries at a large tertiary referral burn center in the United States.烧伤复发:一项为期10年的回顾性研究,对美国一家大型三级转诊烧伤中心的反复烧伤患者进行特征分析。
Burns Trauma. 2019 Mar 19;7:9. doi: 10.1186/s41038-019-0145-4. eCollection 2019.
9
Association between the detection of alcohol, illicit drugs and/or psychotropic medications/opioids in patients admitted due to trauma and trauma recidivism: A cohort study.因创伤住院患者中酒精、非法药物和/或精神药物/阿片类药物的检测与创伤再入院之间的关联:一项队列研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 12;13(9):e0203963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203963. eCollection 2018.
10
Violent trauma recidivism: Does all violence escalate?暴力创伤再犯:所有暴力行为都会升级吗?
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018 Dec;44(6):851-858. doi: 10.1007/s00068-017-0787-5. Epub 2017 Mar 22.