• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Sublingual nicardipine versus nifedipine to treat hypertensive urgencies.

作者信息

Savi L, Montebelli M R, D'Alonzo S, Mettimano M, Folli G

机构信息

Istituto Patologia Medica, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Roma.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1992 Feb;30(2):41-5.

PMID:1551744
Abstract

Hypertensive urgencies are clinical settings in which a steady therapeutic intervention is needed, but this may be safely stretched over some hours. An appropriate antihypertensive drug to use in an urgency should show a potent but gradual effect: it should reduce BP in a short time and it should be easy to modulate the antihypertensive effect, according to individual needs. Sublingual administration is the easiest way for a therapeutical intervention in an urgency. The use of nicardipine administered sublingually was tested in comparison with nifedipine, during a hypertensive urgency, in 24 hypertensive subjects. The peak effect of nifedipine occurred within 10-20 minutes after the administration, whereas that of nicardipine occurred after 45-50 minutes; nevertheless a significant decrease both in systolic and diastolic blood pressure was already observed 20 min after nicardipine administration. The hypotensive effect of nicardipine was longer lasting than that of nifedipine. Some adverse effects were observed in the group receiving nifedipine, whereas no side effects were described by patients receiving nicardipine.

摘要

相似文献

1
Sublingual nicardipine versus nifedipine to treat hypertensive urgencies.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1992 Feb;30(2):41-5.
2
Treatment of hypertensive emergencies with nifedipine.硝苯地平治疗高血压急症。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1988 Jul;26(7):351-5.
3
[Sublingually administered captopril versus nifedipine in hypertension emergencies].高血压急症中舌下含服卡托普利与硝苯地平的比较
Minerva Cardioangiol. 1990 Jan-Feb;38(1-2):37-44.
4
Comparison of sublingual captopril and nifedipine in immediate treatment of hypertensive emergencies. A randomized, single-blind clinical trial.舌下含服卡托普利与硝苯地平治疗高血压急症的疗效比较:一项随机单盲临床试验
Arch Intern Med. 1991 Apr;151(4):678-82.
5
Treatment of hypertensive urgencies with oral nifedipine, nicardipine, and captopril.
Angiology. 1991 Jun;42(6):447-54. doi: 10.1177/000331979104200603.
6
Nicardipine versus nifedipine: multicentre controlled trial in essential hypertension.尼卡地平与硝苯地平对比:原发性高血压的多中心对照试验。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1988;8(6):393-400.
7
[Intravenous urapidil versus sublingual nifedipine in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies].静脉注射乌拉地尔与舌下含服硝苯地平治疗高血压急症的比较
Minerva Cardioangiol. 1994 Jul-Aug;42(7-8):365-71.
8
[Nifedipine level in the blood and its immediate hypotensive effect after its sublingual administration to aged patients].[老年患者舌下含服硝苯地平后血药浓度及其即时降压效果]
Przegl Lek. 1989;46(2):311-5.
9
Antihypertensive effects of intravenous administration of benidipine hydrochloride and some other calcium antagonists in conscious, spontaneously hypertensive rats.静脉注射盐酸贝尼地平及其他一些钙拮抗剂对清醒自发性高血压大鼠的降压作用。
Arzneimittelforschung. 1988 Nov;38(11A):1691-4.
10
[Sublingual captopril versus nifedipine in the treatment of hypertensive crisis].舌下含服卡托普利与硝苯地平治疗高血压急症的比较
Rev Med Chil. 1991 Apr;119(4):402-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Oral drugs for hypertensive urgencies: systematic review and meta-analysis.用于高血压急症的口服药物:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2009 Nov;127(6):366-72. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802009000600009.
2
Comparative tolerability profile of hypertensive crisis treatments.高血压危象治疗的耐受性比较概况
Drug Saf. 1998 Aug;19(2):99-122. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199819020-00003.